Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Thursday, January 12, 2006

The LAST post on old Pharyngula

Pharyngula is dead. Long live Pharyngula!

I've made the move to scienceblogs.com, joining a whole bunch of other science bloggers in a vast new media conglomeration that will put this site on a better, faster server. No more sluggish performance. No more "cannot connect to database" messages. Just pages flying out at you with no hesitation. Well, I hope, at least.

There's just one more brief moment of pain: all you regular readers of Pharyngula are going to have to update your bookmarks and newsreaders, I'm afraid. All the old links to this site will still work, so that will require no changes, but all the new content will be posted exclusively over there. Sorry about that. In a few weeks I'll patch the main page here to do an automatic redirect, but for now you ought to change things around on your end, and get used to going to a new URL (it's all going to be so much better, I promise.)

Here's the vital info:

New Address: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/


New Feed: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/index.xml


See you all at the new place!


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/3330/FUNRnMo7/

Comments:
#47835: Eva Young — 11/08  at  10:29 PM
Closer to home there are some creationists running in the Minnetonka school board election. They've already got that blithering creationist Dave Eaton on their school board.



#47840: — 11/08  at  11:20 PM
Good news indeed; and in a few weeks, hopefully we'll have the court ruling that gives the coup de grace to the ID nonsense, at least in PA.

It couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch of wankers.



's avatar #47846: Zeno — 11/08  at  11:53 PM
Sweet!



#47881: Orac — 11/09  at  07:13 AM
Maybe if this happens enough times, Republicans will learn that siding with religious pseudoscience is not a way to get elected and re-elected.

I can dream, can't I?

--
Orac “A statement of fact cannot be insolent.”
http://oracknows.blogspot.com



#47882: — 11/09  at  07:16 AM
Hearing about this on the radio this morning really started my day off well. For the moment, at least, Pennsylvania has broken ranks with the Legion of Goober.



#47995: — 11/09  at  02:13 PM
Well, one step forward in Dover. One step back in Kansas.

I wish I could experience one of those forward steps down here in Texas, which has made one step backwards into theocracy on a different topic, recently.

I voted against that step... The polling place was a church, complete with pictures of Gee-Whiz on the walls. I feel icky.



#48031: — 11/09  at  04:18 PM
It's interesting that they all lost, regardless of which way they originally voted on the ID thing. Does anyone know how much of an issue the trial and its potential fallout were in the campaign? Was the potential 7-figure loss to the school district in having to pay the plaintiff's legal fees an issue?



#48043: — 11/09  at  04:48 PM
The election results and the testimony Harrisburg may not be what they seem.

Many voters in Dover may well have been voting on more than just the ID nonsense. True, the Dover CARES slate ran in opposition to ID in the science classroom but that was only one issue. Others such as the current boards mismanagement of money and their unwillingness to engage in serious negotiations with the teacher's union (Dover is a blue-collar town) were likely factors as well. Some, who are backers of ID, voted for Dover CARES because they thought pushing the issue was counter productive and a waste of taxpayers' money.

Also as Ed Brayton has so ably pointed out on his blog, Judge Jones's decision could wind up applying only to the two parties in this case and set no precedent beyond Dover. And the decision could hinge entirely on the dissembling of the school board members and their administrators, and not address the scientific and/or religious merits of ID. And with the school board having completely turned over, a decision for the plaintiffs is unlikely to be appealed by the new DASD board. ID could emerge from a losing decision with little more than a scratch or two, ready for another legal battle. Kansas anyone?

I noted from the the ACLU blog and the York Daily Record that Richard Thompson did not appear (or at least wasn't reported) in court after the first week or so of testimony, leaving his underlings to cross examine the plaintiffs' witnesses, present the DASD's witnesses and deliver the summation. Could that have been because he saw the handwriting on the wall and wanted to dissociate himself from fathering this particular failure?



#48065: — 11/09  at  05:27 PM
Yes, that NYT article put a smile on my face this morning.



Trackback: Bloglining Tracked on: PSoTD (207.44.199.176) at 2005 11 08 23:58:38
From around the blogs... Josh Marshall is right: Bush laid a big egg in the Virginia gubernatorial race. Just wait to see what Republicans do now tha...



Trackback: Dover and Dover again Tracked on: Science and Sarcasm (72.9.234.70) at 2005 11 09 00:17:49
via Pharyngula: Yesterday, the Dover Kansas school board approved, by a vote of 6-4, a modification of public school science standards to cast doubt on evolution and to include creationist explanations for natural phenomena: The new standar...



Trackback: More on Kansas Dumbassery Tracked on: Homo Sum (63.111.22.74) at 2005 11 09 08:18:18
(I’ve done so many entries on the whole “evolution in schools” thing that you’d think I would be getting tired of it. But, no. I am fuelled by sweet, sweet rage.) Dan Gilmour points to the Guardian article on the Kansas deci...



Trackback: The Public Speaks! Tracked on: More Evolution Theories (67.101.148.156) at 2005 11 09 09:15:07
The Dover, PA School Board has championed the theory of evolution known as Intelligent Design for so long that they forgot the public's power to determine truth and science.



#48106: — 11/09  at  08:01 PM
As was already mentioned, one of the big issues besides the ID proposal itself, was the money being spent on legal fees to push that agenda. It wasn't just that people were against ID in the classroom, it was also people who are for it, but thought it was a waste of taxpayer money to wage a legal battle over the issue.



#48121: — 11/09  at  08:56 PM
The election won't change the trial...the school district will still lose and will still have to pay over a million dollars in plaintiffs' attorney fees.

The intellichimp design nutcases are going to lose, the only question is how big. The ruling might only apply to this case...or it may set a nationwide precedent against intellichimp design.



#48254: — 11/10  at  02:35 PM
York Dispatch today reports that one voting machine apparently conked out, and it seems quite within the cards that it was not a clean sweep for Dover CARES.

The margins were very, very thin.



's avatar #48589: — 11/14  at  05:14 AM
"And the Lord did look with discontent upon the town of Dover in the province of Pennsylvania. For Dover was a wicked and prideful place and had turned its back on God. Its people had voted out school board members who tried to introduce intelligent design into schools as an alternative to the theory of evolution."

"And the Lord was wrathful and said, I will smite them with burning coals from the sky. Their fields I will make barren, their rivers I will cause to rise in flood, their football teams will lose, their sewers will back up, no one who lives there shall hit the Powerball. And I will help them not."

Quod natura non sunt turpia



Page 1 of 1 pages

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college