Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Wednesday, February 02, 2005

A little meta, a little meat

My previous post on sponge relationships had me thinking some about this weblog business, because, honestly, I know next to nothing about sponges. I am not a sponge expert. If you're wondering about details of that paper because you are a sponge expert, you're not going to get them from me. So, anyway, I'm indulging in a little meta-discussion here in addition to delivering a morsel of scientific meat because I felt like clarifying exactly what I'm doing.

Why am I weblogging? Here's a list of reasons in random order with no attempt to quantify their importance.

  1. Out of a sense of obligation. This is a rather high-minded excuse, but I think we academics should feel a duty to disseminate information beyond that small group of people who actually pay us tuition. I don't believe this kind of thing can single-handedly change the world, but if all of us took a little time every week to share and explain some small bit of our specialized knowledge, the world might start becoming a slightly smarter place.
  2. Because I can. I may not be an expert on sponges, but I do have a good generalist's knowledge of biology, and I have bookshelves full of some of the most obscure and most fundamental books on some of these subjects, and I have access to my university's library resources. I know how to quickly extract all kinds of interesting academic knowledge, so I do.
  3. To educate myself. Why write about sponges? Precisely because I don't know a lot about them. It motivates me to pull a few invertebrate biology texts down and browse through the relevant chapters. One of the great things about science is that it is so huge and complex, and stimuli to explore some otherwise unexamined byway in the great maze of the literature is appreciated.
  4. To organize my thoughts. I've always been happy to amble off on odd tangents in my reading, and I've always accumulated collections of factlets. I've found that since I've started weblogging some of this stuff, though, it helps me assemble some structure to those ideas. It's added a bit of discipline to the process.
  5. To be a better teacher. I have the most wonderful job in the world, because for me to spend an hour or two exploring the weird world of poriferan phylogeny actually contributes to my success as a teacher. All this stuff gets tucked away in my brain and eventually re-emerges in a lecture (relevantly and cogently, I hope.)
  6. For fun and ego. World, I matter! You may think that the stuff my kids do, for instance, is trivial and doesn't affect you, but I care, and I'll say so. You're just going to have to tolerate the fact that everyone else on the planet has slightly different hierarchies of concern. Mine are expressed here. Mine, I tell you!
  7. Venting. I think I matter, but I'm not delusional: I know the rest of the world mostly doesn't care. So when I'm frustrated at the way the universe disregards my sensibilities, I can at least shout out my discontent here, and maybe stake out a little piece of reality that works the way I like it. Or find people who are similarly distressed.
  8. Escape! I'm in a teeny-tiny town in a huge empty swathe of the rural midwest—the internet may be virtual and limited, but it's one slender connection to the rest of the world. Talk to me, please. Entertain me, now.
  9. To proselytize. Science, progressive politics, and secularism are the tools that will save the world and lead humankind to a new Renaissance, while creationism, Rethuglicanism, and religion are the forces of darkness. I find it hard to believe that some people are so blind that they do not realize this, so I must spread the Word.
  10. To inspire interesting discussions. I started off in this game with very little concern about how many people would read this page, and I think I'd keep it up even if no one else ever read it. But as readership has risen, one other good thing that has emerged is that I can throw out some scrap of an idea and people actually disagree with me or expand on it or give me a completely different perspective, and that's extremely cool. Who knows, maybe even a real sponge expert will show up and say something. So now I'm sorta thinking it would be nice if everyone on the planet read these articles of mine and left a little bit of their own personality and information attached to it. (This idea may be a little unhealthy: see #7. Must preserve sense of perspective.)

OK, the system is temporarily purged of introspective tendencies. Thoughtless babbling will recommence…now.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/1874/apg8Zu90/

Comments:
#15146: — 02/02  at  06:29 PM
One pictures you in the driver's seat of a powerful sportscar, kneading the rich leather grip of the wheel, then bringing the throttle up till you sense the power leaping to you command, savoring the heady experience of your newfound place among the others. Self actualization in a higher mammal. Cool.



#15156: Jan Theodore Galkowski — 02/02  at  08:47 PM
Yeah, Richard, but PZ should learn to appreciate the fear and sweaty thrill of having to use Kill Switch, in its incarnation in Magic--the Gathering.

Speaking of not-so-senseless babbling, the erudite Freeman Dyson has a controversial article titled "The Darwinian Interlude" in the March 2005 Technology Review, presenting the work of Carl Woese's "A New Biology for a New Century” from the June 2004 issue of Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

For those of you who don't know, Dyson is a very deep thinker, installed at the Princeton Institute for Advanced Study (Einstein's old digs), and has come up with some truly original and scientifically sound approaches to problems, but approaches which are so out there they typically scoot well over most people's heads.

For instance, Dyson's answer to a failure to detect advanced civilizations elsewhere so far was a comment that we were looking in the wrong place, for such civilizations had energy requirements far in excess of what we can can imagine, let along deliver. He proposed such civilizations would harness all the energy from their local star by constructing what is now known as a Dyson sphere. This is a very large sphere having a radius of, say, the Earth's orbit about the sun, adjusted of course for whatever the local star's intensity is, thereby trapping all the energy radiating from it. The civilization would arrange an atmosphere on its interior and live there. Now, that is what you call engineering.

Another example is is proposal that rather than go with the heavy and big approach to unmanned space exploration, we rather focus upon constructing whole flotillas or flocks or swarms of miniature robots, perhaps a few thousand, and send them to an interplanetary place of study. These would not all be unique but would be of a few types and then replicated. That way reliability would be enhanced as well as other characteristics, such as covering a lot of spatial territory. If they were light enough they might be able to flutter down to the surface of a planet rather than have to reenter so dramatically.

Freeman Dyson is also the dad of Esther Dyson.

Well, in this article Dyson says:
Woese is the world’s greatest expert in the field of microbial taxonomy. Whatever he writes, even in a speculative vein, is to be taken seriously.

Woese is postulating a golden age of pre-Darwinian life, during which horizontal gene transfer was universal and separate species did not exist. Life was then a community of cells of various kinds, sharing their genetic information so that clever chemical tricks and catalytic processes invented by one creature could be inherited by all of them. Evolution was a communal affair, the whole community advancing in metabolic and reproductive efficiency as the genes of the most efficient cells were shared. But then, one evil day, a cell resembling a primitive bacterium happened to find itself one jump ahead of its neighbors in efficiency. That cell separated itself from the community and refused to share. Its offspring became the first species. With its superior efficiency, it continued to prosper and to evolve separately. Some millions of years later, another cell separated itself from the community and became another species. And so it went on, until all life was divided into species.

So the deal and pattern is we have a kind of "plasmids gone amuck" biosphere proposed here.

Well, the upshot is that Dyson sees "cultural evolution" as a kind of reemergence of the "plasmids gone amuck" theme. It isn't surprising that someone with Dyson's ideas about the power of intelligence to reform natural structures believing it significant. But, then, a mass of these intelligent critters reelected W.

I thought the idea and article interesting enough to indicate to this fine audience for review and comment.

Talk about unreasonable ideas, what's going on with the French and advertising for wine? The pictures in question are very pleasant, in my opinion, but then I'm just a lecherous old sot.



#15157: — 02/02  at  08:56 PM
Cogito ergo blog
(I'm sure that's not new)



#15158: — 02/02  at  09:02 PM
JTG: You've just disabused me from the belief, however tenuous, that at least the French had their liquor laws in order. Isn't it interesting that what we call a Bordeaux, the English call (or called) a Claret? As for the "energy trap" in space, it is beyond my sphere of reckoning.



#15162: Miranda — 02/02  at  09:45 PM
People like you are the reason I went back to school to earn a BS in something science related. I wanted to reach out and find others who also eschew the dumbing down of our culture. I guess metaposts get metacomments.



#15163: Dana — 02/02  at  09:47 PM
Hi,

I was introduced to your blog by another fan a while back, and I just wanted to tell you how awesomely awesome it is. I've found that writing my thoughts down helps me to realize who I am and what I believe. I am a liberal, atheist, skeptic, INTJ type of guy. You gotta tell people about that somewhere.



#15164: BioGeek — 02/02  at  10:03 PM
That was a fantastic post on why you blog, but could you now also write a post on how you blog: how many hours a day do you spend writing/researching for your blog, how many hours a day do you spend reading other blogs, how have your reading/subscription habits changed to get a scoop for a nice blog post, etc.



#15168: coturnix — 02/02  at  10:33 PM
I am trying to remember how I first got here. It must have been from Chris Mooney's Blogroll.

At first, I prefered the community spirit of forums (and campaign blogs) and started my own blog mainly as an easy-to-assemble website to store some of my old essays, better posts from the about-to-get-shut-down campaign blog, etc. Then I started liking it. Then I got reader feedback. Then I got blogrolled and linked by others. By then, it was too late. I was stricken by the disease... Now I feel an obligation to post, too. Plus, all the other reasons you mention also apply to me (and everyone else?), except, perhaps for living in RTP, NC which is a nice smart place.

I also felt the need to separate two sides of me, one very political, atheistic, personal and argumentative (on one blog) and the other as a calm unbiased scientific expert (on the other blog). It's working fine for me so far. The two blogs attract very different kinds of audience, and, interestingly, the blog with a very narrow scientific focus, although much newer and less well known, gets many more daily hits than my political rants.

Anyway, thanks for sharing this.



#15170: — 02/02  at  11:01 PM
11. To make the world a better place to live. A lot of people all over the world enjoys and learns reading this blog that you generously provide for us. You must be a very good teacher and a nice person.



#15176: — 02/03  at  08:28 AM
Thanks, PZ, for this wonderful opportunity with which you have provided us.

It greatly saddens me that I won't be able to make it up to Morris for Darwin's birthday your famous jambalaya.

smile

Keep up the good work!

Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

-Jerry Garcia



#15266: — 02/04  at  12:01 PM
All good reasons.

The science learning is wonderful for those of us who are mostly curious, with modest backgrounds in such.

The political is good because I usually agree with you grin

Richard gets special mention for character (or being a character) because he hangs out with us even though our politics annoy him. I do know one liberal Marine, so there is hope for Richard yet.

I too, live in an out of the way place (not as out of the way as Morris ... ) and it is neat to have contact with a group that I could not find in my own neighborhood. Growing up in a culture where good people go to church and bad people go to bars (rural sociology 101), makes this especially important to me.

It is comforting to know that Hank will do a primal scream for us, and then Jan will find a way to invoke mysticism and Myst to lend a fresh perspective to any issue.

I too regret not being there for Darwin's birthday.

Keep us the good work.

12. Because I can send PZ an article or two and he will blog it so I dont have to. I believe we call this the I'm Lazy principle.

(BTW, my recent lack of participation is due to being netless at home in the wake of moving. Same neighborhood, different domicile. Situation should be rectified soon.)



#15278: — 02/04  at  01:48 PM
And of course that should say "Keep up the good work". Thanks



Page 1 of 1 pages

Next entry: Carnival Of The Godless: Send me more!

Previous entry: Sponge relationships

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college