Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Thursday, December 16, 2004

A neurological mechanism for Fragile-X disease

I haven't even finished grading the last of the developmental biology papers, and already my brain is swiveling towards the genetics literature, as I get in the right frame of mind to teach our core genetics course in the spring. And, lo, here is a new paper in PNAS that addresses details of a topic I bring up every time.

There are a surprising number of heritable diseases that share a couple of common traits: they are neurodegenerative, causing progressive loss of neural control, and they also exhibit a phenomenon called genetic anticipation—they tend to get worse, with earlier onset and more severe affects with each generation. Some of these diseases may be rather obscure, for instance Haw-River Syndrome (AKA Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy), Friedreich Ataxia, Machado-Joseph Disease, or X-linked Spinal and Bulbar Atrophy Disease (AKA Kennedy Disease), but others you've probably heard of, like Myotonic dystrophy and Huntington Disease. These are dreadful diseases that are variable in their pattern of appearance, and have terrible symptoms, like loss of motor control, chorea, seizures, dementia, and eventually, death.

Another tie that binds them together is their molecular cause: these are all trinucleotide repeat diseases. Our DNA has stretches in its sequence where the same nucleotides may be repeated a few times. The gene responsible for myotonic dystrophy, for instance, has a short stretch of cytosine-thymine-guanosine (CTG) repeated 5 times at the 3' end of the transcript—CTGCTGCTGCTGCTG. People with a mild form of myotonic dystrophy may have 50 CTG repeats in the gene instead; in severe forms, they may have 1000.

The mechanism by which the sequences get excessively replicated is thought to be by mispairing. During the replication of the DNA, the individual strands unpair and re-pair, and with all of those similar repeated sequences, it's easy for the two strands to get temporarily misaligned…and the replication enzymes err in making extra copies. I guess polymerases have the same problem reading the boring, repetitive bits that we do, and its easy to lose track of whether you've read CTG five times, or six times.

These excessive copies of codons tend to muck up the function of the gene. Huntington Disease, which is caused by an expansion of 19-21 copies of CAG in normal people into roughly 50 in affected individuals, affects an interaction domain. The CAG repeats form a repeated series of glutamine amino acids in the protein, which apparently bind to other proteins. Having many more glutamines makes the binding stronger, and the cell's cytoplasm is afflicted with a gluey glop that leads to accumulating cell damage.

It's easy to see how extra amino acids tagged onto a proteins can change its function. There is another trinucleotide repeat disease that has been less easy to understand, though. It's called Fragile-X Mental Retardation (FMR), and it is the most common cause of heritable mental retardation, occurring in roughly 1 of every 1500 male births and 1 of every 2500 females.

FMR isn't entirely a neurodegenerative disease. Its effects take place during development, and cause a characteristic suite of distinctive facial characters with moderate to severe mental retardation, although the degree of retardation may increase with age. Carriers of FMR, people who don't express the overt symptoms but whose children are likely to inherit it, may also exhibit some late-onset difficulties such as tremor and ataxia.

fragile X chromosome

Fragile X is a typical trinucleotide repeat disease. It is caused by an expansion of a CGG repeat in a specific region of the long arm of the X chromosome. Normally, we have 6-54 copies of CGG in this region; carriers have 50-200; and affected individuals have 200-1300 copies. There are enough copies to change the coiling and protein packing of the DNA in that region, which can give the chromosome a distinctive pinched appearance (as on the left), and in culture, cells with fragile-X are likely to break at that spot, hence the name.

One odd thing about Fragile-X, though, is suggested by the variable numbers of repeats in unaffected people: the repeats aren't actually in a protein. They are in a stretch of DNA that is transcribed but not translated into a protein called FMRP, but the repeats are always neatly clipped off…so even people severely affected with Fragile-X Mental Retardation have a perfectly normal FMRP.

Part of this problem has been resolved. It turns out that all those CGGs seem to trigger a methylation response in the cell. Enzymes cruise along the chromosome, and attach methyl groups to the DNA backbone as a signal to the transcription enzymes to avoid this region. That means that although these individuals could make a functional FMRP, that gene has been inactivated, and they therefore have greatly reduced levels of FMRP. Of course, the next question is about what FMRP does in the cell, and that's where the new paper by Weiler et al. comes in.

The brain is a very responsive kind of computer. It is constantly rewiring itself, modifying its pattern of connectivity in response to inputs. Much of this activity goes on at the synapse, or the regions where two neurons come into contact. What we generally think of when we talk about synaptic activity is the release of neurotransmitters from a presynaptic neuron, which bind to receptors on the postsynaptic neuron, which then cause ion channels to open or close and change the electrical properties of the postsynaptic membrane. Chemicals bind to receptors and cause a little blip of electrical activity, in other words. There is another kind of receptor, though, called a metabotropic receptor. Metabotropic receptors, when they receive a transmitter signal, do not directly cause an electrical change. Instead, they modify the metabolism of the cell. This can mean lots of things: they can change the rate of protein synthesis, they can cause phosphorylation of enzymes, they can enzymatically modify ion channels and thereby cause a change in electrical properties, they can even change the pattern of gene expression in the cell. The metabotropic receptor is a powerful thing that can dramatically change how a cell reacts to its environment.

Here's where FMRP comes in. It seems to be part of the signal transduction mechanism that allows a transmitter signal received by a metabotropic receptor to be translated into a change in protein synthesis at the synapse. It helps to transport mRNA from the nucleus into the dendrites of a neuron, and there it can, when activated by synaptic signal, facilitate the translation of that RNA into protein. The somewhat complicated diagram below tells the story.

FMRP mechanism
A putative role for FMRP in synaptic protein synthesis. (A) FMRP binds to its target mRNAs in the nucleus and helps export them to somatic cytoplasm. (B) FMRP and its target mRNA are packaged into transport assemblies and travel, likely by way of microtubules, down dendrites toward synapses. (C) FMRP–mRNA transport assemblies may take the form of nontranslating granules near synapses where they await some synaptic signal. (D) In response to activation of group 1 mGluRs (stimulated here with DHPG), phosphatidylinositol is cleaved into diacyl glycerol (DAG) and inositol triphosphate (IP3), initiating the release of intracellular calcium (Ca2+i) and activation of PKC. (E) PKC activation triggers an enzyme cascade that, by means of many intermediates (broken arrow), signals nontranslating granules to release FMRP-bound target mRNA for translation.

The circles in the gray, postsynaptic cell are copies of FMRP. It binds to mRNA in the nucleus and then carries it to various places.

In the closeup, we see some more details. At (D) is a metabotropic receptor, which has bound a glutamate transmitter molecule from the dark gray presynaptic cell at the bottom. The metabotropic receptor then activates some signalling pathways (the IP3 and DAG molecules, that then increase calcium levels and turn on PKC). These pathways then tell the FMRP+mRNA to wake up and start making new proteins.

Individuals with Fragile-X Mental Retardation have greatly reduced levels of FMRP, and therefore have lower levels of the specific transported mRNAs in their neurons. Furthermore, since they don't have the FMRP-mRNA complexes present and ready to work, the metabotropic receptors have nothing to activate. The presynaptic cell is sending its signals, the metabotropic receptors are yelling at the cellular machinery to wake up and start working, but there's little present to respond. Missing a piece of the response circuit means that the neurons have lost an important sensor that they use for synaptic remodeling.

You may be wondering if this offers the possibility of a cure for Fragile-X disease. The authors don't speculate, but probably not, and if it provides any help at all, it's a long way off. This is all work in mouse models, not people, and it's an analysis of the cause of the problem. We don't yet have a way to increase FMRP levels in people who have had the gene inactivated. If we could get more FMRP into the brains of people with this syndrome, maybe it would alleviate the progressive severity of the retardation, but it would be unlikely to correct the retardation itself. This is a developmental disorder; the brain has been deprived of some of its ability to respond to stimuli during its formation, and that is an error that can't be retroactively corrected.


Weiler IJ, Spangler CC, Klintsova AY, Grossman AW, Kim SH, Bertaina-Anglade V, Khaliq H, de Vries FE, Lambers FAE, Hatia F, Base CK, Greenough WT (2004) Fragile X mental retardation protein is necessary for neurotransmitter-activated protein translation at synapses. PNAS 101 (50): 17504-17509.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/1720/rBHcOOuz/

Comments:
#11283: — 12/16  at  04:36 PM
Really interesting stuff, and so clearly written as usual.

Whenever I read these kinds of things my first reaction is always to be amazed that any of us manage to develop even half-way normally.



#11284: — 12/16  at  04:36 PM
Wonderful post PZ. The third time through I think I GOT it. Unfortunately, by tomorrow I'll have to read it again. Isn't there some way for the brain to delete the lyrics of 1950s Warner Bros. TV Westerns (Cheyenne, Sugarfoot, Maverick) and open up some RAM for this stuff.



's avatar #11302: PZ Myers — 12/16  at  09:51 PM
You forgot Rawhide.

Move ‘em on, head ‘em up.  Head ‘em up, move ‘em on.  Move ‘em on, head ‘em up Rawhide
Count ‘em out, ride ‘em in.  Ride ‘em in, count ‘em out.  Count ‘em out, ride ‘em in Rawhide!


My apologies for giving you another nasty ohrwurm.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#11311: — 12/17  at  07:12 AM
My eldest son was tested for Fragile X, because he had great difficulties in schooling. It turned out that he has a mosaic form of XYY Syndrome (not to be confused with Klinefelter's Syndrome XXY). This is what I found online.

Men usually have only one X and one Y chromosome, i.e. the chromosome constitution 46,XY. Men with XYYsyndrome have two Y chromosomes, and the chromosome constitution 47,XYY. The frequency is approximately 1 of 1000 men, i.e.in Denmark, with 5 millions inhabitant, there are 3000 boys and men with XYY syndrome.

You cannot see on a newborn boy, that he has the XYY syndrome. Except for increased height there are nospecial physical stigmata in boys and men with XYY syndrome. Their average height is approximately 7 cms. above the expectedheight. Physical developement is otherwise normal, sex-organs are normal.

Boys with XYY syndrome often are more physically active than their brothers, and if this activity is canalized into play,sports or other physical activities with parent and other children, this fact is in no way negative. Boys with XYY syndromehave a tendency to a delayed mental maturation, and in connection with an increased tendency for learning-problems inschool, this means a need for early and adequate stimulation.

It is important that these boys at an early age are admitted to a good day-care institution, and that there is a closecooperation between parents and staff in day-care and kindergarten. If the speech development is delayed, it is importantwith speech therapist help for a period. Commonly XYY boys develop normally inchildhood, and their intelligence is usually within the normal range.

The high level of activity and eventually learning-problems can give difficulties in school, and there may be need for anextra educational effort. Such an effort often gives good results, and problems with learning can be overcome.

The Turner Center For Information, Counselling, and Research has published a booklet on the XYY syndrome. This booklet can be ordered free of charge by request to the centre.

For parents, who have been informed through prenatal examination, that the foetus has the karyotype 47,XYY, we canmediate contact to parents, who have a son with the XYY syndrome, and such a contact can also be arranged if the diagnosis XYY syndrome is made at a later stage. -----

The school authorities were informed when my boy was 15, but being a state school in NW London, they were disinclined to do anything to help. Now 22, he is qualified to spray vehicles and is in full employment. Statistically there are 26,000 such men and boys in the UK, most of whom are undiagnosed. It makes you think what other genetic influences there might be on the process of learning in schools. My boy left school with no academic diplomas. However, he studied and practiced a trade that he enjoys. Schools! Bah, humbug!

Pericles



#11336: — 12/17  at  11:27 AM
Are there certain regions of the brain that are affected worse than others? Or, is this more of a global effect?

In other words, do certain types of neurons (or specific networks) normally have more FMRP-mRNA complex levels, resulting in a more localized deleterious function in effected individuals?

Once in a while you get shown the light, in the strangest of places if you look at it right.

-Jerry Garcia



Trackback: The appearance of large satellites Tracked on: The Genius (66.151.149.25) at 2005 08 31 01:15:33
Isn't that how you do it? Find the most interesting descriptive quote from the literature regarding your topic and use it for a title? This one comes form Herbert Lubs, the first person to describe the chromosomal aberration for



Page 1 of 1 pages

Next entry: Anyone with seniors in high school knows what time of year this is

Previous entry: Christmas is for godless atheists and secular humanists, too!

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college