Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Saturday, February 19, 2005

Anthropological fraud in Germany

Feorag at The Pagan Prattle passed along this curious news item about an anthropological fraud in Germany. It's also a case of an academic con man—I think Horowitz would just love this Professor Reiner Protsch von Zieten of the University of Frankfurt:

During their investigation, the university discovered that Prof Protsch, 65, a flamboyant figure with a fondness for gold watches, Porsches and Cuban cigars, was unable to work his own carbon-dating machine.

He also boasted of having flats in New York, Florida and California, where, he claimed, he hung out with Arnold Schwarzenegger and Steffi Graf. Even the professor's aristocratic title, "von Zieten", appears to be bogus.

Porsches? Gold watches? Movie and sports stars? How come none of the scientists I know live that kind of lifestyle?

He's also been discovered to have attempted to sell off the university's chimpanzee skull collection, and a number of their scientific specimen's have since been found to be headless: I guess you can keep yourself in Havanas if you're willing to sell off your scientific artifacts.

Most seriously, he has been corrupting scientific data for a long time. He's not a hugely influential name in science and his "discoveries" haven't been that earthshaking (I'd never heard of him before, and his Hahnhöfersand Man, Binshof-Speyer Woman, and Paderborn-Sande Man are specimens I hadn't heard of, either), but he is apparently one of the European authorities people have sent specimens to for carbon dating. He can't even operate his own equipment, and apparently he's just been making up dates! There may be a number of scientists who are going to have to re-evaluate their data.

That's not the kind of thing you can get away with indefinitely, though. He was caught when his specimens were double-checked by a second and more reputable source, and the inconsistencies started to spill out. I'm sure we'll hear more from creationists crowing about this, but they won't bother to explain that it was real scientists who found him out. And, unfortunately, it's also a black mark for the scientific community that this joker was able to commit fraud for thirty years.

There are also some other ugly undercurrents to the story.

Far from being the descendant of a dashing general in the hussars, the professor was the son of a Nazi MP, Wilhelm Protsch, Der Spiegel magazine revealed last October.

The university is investigating how thousands of documents lodged in the anthropology department relating to the Nazis' gruesome scientific experiments in the 1930s were mysteriously shredded, allegedly under the professor's instructions.

Protsch has lost his job, but I think he deserves rather more severe punishment than that, if even half these allegations prove true.


Since afarensis took the trouble to find additional links to this story, but my software mangled them, I've reformatted them and include them here:

History of modern man unravels as German scholar is exposed as fraud
Neanderthal Man 'never walked in northern Europe'
Recent reports of Neanderthal and more data:
Neanderthal man faces dating disaster in U.K.
Neanderthal Man much younger than thought.
Neanderthal markers of the frontal bone--a conspicuous Hallstatt cranium of the burial field Dietfurt/Oberpfalz
Book review from the American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/1936/q5nBy79m/

Comments:
#16410: — 02/19  at  10:22 AM
I was snorting and chortling until that last bit. Lock 'im up and throw away the key, I say.



#16432: — 02/19  at  01:43 PM
It's Germany, where they take Nazism very seriously indeed. So it's quite likely they will lock him up if the case is proven.



#16439: — 02/19  at  03:43 PM
Why should he need to know how to use the carbon dating machine?

I thought that what grad students were for?

(cue snare drum/cymbal)



#16451: — 02/19  at  06:22 PM
Carbon dating is not something that will get you widely know. In the US you would probably publish your research in Radiocarbon or maybe American Antiquity. Over and above that there are a number of universities that publish technical monographs on carbon dating.
Unless you specialized in European archaeology you probably wouldn't have heard of him here in the states (I haven't). I suspect that most american archaeologists would probably have sent their samples back to one of the two or three big carbon dating labs here in the US so whatever dates he was sending out would effect european archaeologist only. I also think that whatever dates he gave couldn't have been too far out of line with known european prehistory or there would have been a lot more questions. To give an, american example, if an archaeologist had excavated a Mississippian site and got back pre-Hopewell dates, he or she, would have been suspicious and started checking for contaminants and questioning the lab.
I have not heard of Hahnhöfersand Man, Binshof-Speyer Woman, and Paderborn-Sande Man. Unfortunately, I think this is something the creationist types will seize on. Bummer!



#16453: — 02/19  at  07:21 PM
Okay,
I've done a little more research on the issue. It is slightly more important than I thought, but it is also slightly old news. I found mention of the fraud as early as August or September of 2004. The Hahnhöfersand speciman was that of a neanderthal dating to about 36,000 years ago. Supposedly, it displayed traits that were a mixture of neanderthal and anatomically modern humans. It is apparently one of the first neanderthal specimens discovered in northern europe. Obviously, it would have impact on the "out of Africa" vs "Multiregional Continuity" debate. Interestingly enough, Chris Stringer (one of the strongest advocates of "Out of Africa") was one of the people who uncovered the fraud. I also found a 2003 book review of "The Human Fossil Record, Vol 1 (Schwartz and Tattersal)" written by Milford Wolpoff. In the review Wolpoff criticizes Schwartz and Tattersal for including the "controversial" Hahnhöfersand. Wolpoff, it should be noted is an advocate of multiregional continuity and Hahnhöfersand would have lent strong support to the theory of multiregional continuity. So basically we have a scientist refusing to accept evidence that would support a theory he is strongly identified with - about the best example of scientific integrity I have seen.
Of course the creationist are all over like stink on a skunk. Here are links to some of the info I have found:

<a href="http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/sciences/story/0,12243,1418104,00.html">

<a href="www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=2146411784">

<a href="personales.com/mexico/guadalajara/RV1960/new.htm>

<a href ="lists.drizzle.com/pipermail/ hnn-newsletter/2004/000147.html">

<a href="www3.sympatico.ca/bibleprophecy/evolution.html">

<a href=http://www.creationsciencemovement.com/news/2004/03.html">

<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1859196&dopt=Abstract">
<a href=http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:rua-ODF-js0J:www-personal.umich.edu/~wolpoff/Papers/reviews/TattersallAJPA.pdf+hahnofersand+man&hl=en&ie=UTF-8">



#16454: — 02/19  at  07:25 PM
Oops,
I totally messed up the links. Let's try this:

<a href ="education.guardian.co.uk/higher/sciences/story/0,12243,1418104,00.html> Guardian</a>



#16456: — 02/19  at  07:31 PM
Dang,
One more time. If this doesn't work you will have to cut and past.
Guardian

If this doesn't work cut and paste these and you have my appologies for, apparently, forgetting everything I know about html:

http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/sciences/story/0,12243,1418104,00.html

http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=2146411784

personales.com/mexico/guadalajara/RV1960/new.htm

lists.drizzle.com/pipermail/ hnn-newsletter/2004/000147.html

www3.sympatico.ca/bibleprophecy/evolution.html

http://www.creationsciencemovement.com/news/2004/03.html

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=1859196&dopt=Abstract

http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:rua-ODF-js0J:www-personal.umich.edu/~wolpoff/Papers/reviews/TattersallAJPA.pdf+hahnofersand+man&hl=en&ie=UTF-8



#16465: pough — 02/19  at  10:30 PM
Here's the take of someone I'm close to:

What kind of confidence can you have in a scientific community that allows that blatent a fraud to go on for 30 years? Evidently people just turned a blind eye rather than turning him in...it's not just this guy but all the others who show no regard for the truth...makes you wonder????????????


This is based on:
Frankfurt University's president, Rudolf Steinberg, apologized for the university's failure to curb Protsch's misconduct for decades. "A lot of people looked the other way," he said.


...which I couldn't find in any article.



#16469: mattH — 02/20  at  12:40 AM
There's an article on DW-World.de that says as much, but it's a German-language news site that's been translated into english, so it might be a bit off. Hard to say. If it was said, I would like to see a bit more context.

On quick question, do we have any idea how many sites his "work" might have impacted directly? It seems most of his work has been on human remains, but I doubt that this is all of it.



#16493: — 02/20  at  01:03 PM
MattH,
Most of the info I found focused on the skeletal material being improperly dated, with very little focus on the bad carbon dates he provided for others. Presumably, there are records of all the sites he provided dates for, but if he was making dates up I wonder of good his records are. Unfortunately, Hahnhöfersand is much more news worthy for the press than a story about improperly dated mesolithic and neolithic sites. Incidentally, as you would expect the creationist are all over it and I have found at least one case that looks like plagiarism. Check this out:

Answers in Genesis Scroll down a bit to the discussion about classic and advanced neanderthals, then check out the footnotes and compare it to:

<a href="http://www.geocities.com/fdocch/new.htm> Geocities</a> scroll down to the section entitled: Regarding the “progressive” or “advanced” neandertals and compare the discussions and footnotes.



#16496: — 02/20  at  01:07 PM
Sorry,
I have the flu and the mysteries of HTML seem to be beyond me at the moment (even though PZ is blaming his software, I'm sure it's my fault).

Geocities



#16701: — 02/23  at  12:26 PM
Ah, I see the spirit of Teilhard de Chardin of Piltdown Man and Peking Man infamy is still alive and well.



#16796: Jim Foley — 02/23  at  05:11 PM
Eh? There is no infamy associated with the Peking Man fossils - they may have disappeared, but they were valid fossils and were extensively documented before their disappearance. Piltdown - certainly infamous, but there's no solid evidence that Teilhard de Chardin was responsible for it. He is one of many suspects, and not usually considered the most likely one.



Page 1 of 1 pages

Next entry: Evolving textbook stickers

Previous entry: We are all lemmings, we bloggers

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college