Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Thursday, May 05, 2005

Falcarius utahensis

(Dave Thomas has another take on this discovery at the Panda's Thumb.)

It's another transitional fossil! This one won't cause the creationists much discomfort, though, since it is transitional between two extinct groups and they can therefore ignore it, just as they do 99.99% of all science. Falcarius utahensis is a member of a strange little side branch within the theropods that had begun to switch over from eating meat to living on plants—they were a bunch of Cretaceous vegans. The cool thing about this particular specimen is that it was caught in the early stages of this shift, and it exhibits a mix of carnivorous and herbivorous traits, and therefore lets us see what kind of adaptations were involved.

Here's a reconstruction of the animal, and you can see it's overall raptor-like form, including the nasty great claws. This skeleton is built up from several individuals, and you can also see that one thing missing is a good skull.

therizinosauroid
f, reconstructed right pectoral girdle UMNH VP 12279, 12281 and forelimb UMNH VP 12284, 12287, 12289, 12291, 12294−12296, 12298, 12300, 12302, 12314, 12304, 12306, 12308, 12310, 12312, 12316, 12320 in lateral view; g, Falcarius skeletal reconstruction; h, reconstructed left foot UMNH-VP 12330−12342, 12352−12356 in anteriodorsal view; i, medial caudal vertebrae UMNH VP 12405, 12407, 12409 with chevron UMNH VP12391 in lateral view.

The cladogram shows where Falcarius is in the grand scheme of the theropods.

therizinosauroid

Despite the lack of a complete skull, the investigators do have jaws and maxillae and teeth—and there's where the difference between this lineage and other theropods is apparent. Those are leaf-shaped, iguana-like teeth; this guy wasn't ripping into flesh, he was chomping on leaves. He also had a toothless beak.

therizinosauroid
a, Partial left maxilla UMNH VP 14526 in lateral view; b, c, close-up of maxillary teeth in lingual (b) and labial (c) views; d, detail of maxillary tooth denticles in labial view; e, dentary teeth UMNH VP 14527 in lingual view; f, detail of dentary tooth denticles in labial view; g, same dentary teeth in labial view; h, composite reconstruction of the dentary of Falcarius based on UMNH VP 14527, UMNH VP 14528 and UMNH VP 14529. nf, nutritive foramina.

The authors compare this skeleton to its nearest relatives:

Therizinosaurs are here proposed as shifting their dietary habit from predation to herbivory on the basis of the development of a number of features that seem convergent with clades of other herbivorous dinosaurs. The most significant of these features include small, leaf-shaped teeth, an edentulous beak, posterior displacement of the pubis and lateral expansion of the pelvis associated with greatly increased intestinal volume, and shortening of the tibia relative to the femur and an increased number of weight-supporting pedal digits—the latter two being specific reversals of the cursorial condition. Falcarius demonstrates the mosaic nature of this evolutionary transition, indicating that the dentition and pelvis were among the first hard-tissue structures to undergo modification. These changes probably coincided with modifications in food acquisition and digestion during the early stages of therizinosauroid evolution. Moreover, similarities between the dentition of the basal therizinosaur Falcarius and the basal oviraptorosaur Incisivosaurus, in combination with their proposed sister relationship, raises the possibility that the common ancestor of these clades had already undertaken the initial steps in this transition.

Another small puzzle piece falls into place, and it fits neatly into the framework provided by other fossil specimens and evolutionary theory.


Kirkland JI, Zanno LE, Sampson SD, Clark JM, DeBlieux DD (2005) A primitive therizinosauroid dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous of Utah. Nature 435:84-87.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/2248/B7IYQrAw/

Comments:
#24070: Duane Smith — 05/05  at  03:51 PM
The title of the article is great, "Newfound dinosaur caught in evolution act." You may be correct that creationists will try to ignore "Falcarius utahensis" because it is transitional between two extinct groups. However, this is the kind of discovery that they should not be allowed to ignore. It is time to put these guys on the defensive.

The reason I like the title is that most readers will remember nothing but the title or, more correctly, nothing but their impression of the title. We need to make sure that lay readers of scientific information get the point in the headline or no later than the first paragraph. Little ease will be remembered.



#24074: — 05/05  at  04:14 PM
I suspect that if Creationists address the transitional nature of Falcarius utahensis at all, it will be to assert that this simply represents variation in the dinosaur "basic kind".



#24143: coturnix — 05/06  at  06:55 AM
All they care about are humans. They'll accept evolution for all the billions of other species (as some IDC-ers do), as long as we keep the humans "special". Thus, they don't think of dinosaurs when they mention "missing links" - they think "humans" even if their mouths are saying "whales".



#24317: Dino — 05/08  at  05:20 AM
Realy bizzare dinosaur!!!



#24404: — 05/09  at  11:32 AM
What I find interesting is how evolutionist can "create" and entire creature along with a story line and its place in the evolutionary process from a hanful of bones that represent nothing more than the fact that a creature existed. Why don't we see evidence of new species coming into exsistance. How is it the everything is evolving, yet there are NO new species of plant or animal coming into existance? All we see is extinction... Doesn't this bother anyone?

In order to evolve, a system must have NEW INFORMATION. Yet we now understand through DNA that all life (from the cellular level on up) contains ALL the information it will EVER contain. Mutations NEVER add information, they only degrade existing information. Mutations actually cause a loss of information. Life never improves or "gets better" due to a mutation.

Why aren't we discussing these topics?

What about the 2nd law of thermodynamics? That order descends into chaos...never the other way around. This is scientifically provable.... lets talk about it.

DNA is a genetic code... If there is a code, there must a be a coder. tell a computer programer that there was no coder, that code just happened via a process of blind chance over millions of years....He will say you are insane. Yet DNA is vastly more complex than any program ever written.

(By the way, I am an educated former atheist and evolutionst). Evolution is scientifically impossible.

Garrett-



's avatar #24406: PZ Myers — 05/09  at  11:44 AM
You have got to be kidding me. You aren't particularly well educated at all, or you'd know how bogus those arguments are. Mutations don't add information? The second law of thermodynamics? No new species?

Go away. You are an idiot.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#24408: — 05/09  at  11:57 AM
Gotta jump in here on this Garrett post. WOW! So lets get this straight. Mutations never help, no new species are emerging, and the 2nd law of thermodynamics......................I'd call him an idiot but that has been said already, this post even can with the following disclaimer:

'By the way, I am an educated former atheist and evolutionst). Evolution is scientifically impossible.'

Educated--define the term, clearly not well based on your post. Evolution is scientifically impossible? Wow, no evidence I suppose.

And lastly, since your educated and a 'former' atheist what scientific evidence compels you to change your theological position? Seeing how your opinion rests solely on the 'science'.



#24412: — 05/09  at  12:55 PM
DNA is a genetic code... If there is a code, there must a be a coder. tell a computer programer that there was no coder, that code just happened via a process of blind chance over millions of years....He will say you are insane.

Not if he's a well-informed programmer who has heard of genetic algorithms and evolutionary programming.

http://www.scs.carleton.ca/~csgs/resources/gaal.html
http://dllab.caltech.edu/avida/


Thank you for becoming a former atheist. I would have considered a loud and poorly-informed person like yourself to be an embarrassment.



#24425: coturnix — 05/09  at  02:19 PM
Duane Smith: I just checked your blog for the first time and liked it a lot.



Trackback: A Couple of Good Science Based Titles Tracked on: Abnormal Interests (64.81.36.251) at 2005 05 06 22:05:29
I've been a little under the weather this week, so I haven't completed my next installment of Marketing Biology. However, I have seen two articles whose headlines and first paragraphs are like those that every article on evolution should have....



#24679: — 05/11  at  04:51 PM
Interesting,
Attacks without any type of refutation.
Very sad.

You are betting your eternity on blind chance over millions of years. The Big Bang theory (actually a collection of failed theories) says that: 1st there was nothing....then it exploded.

Chaos does not creat order.

Use that mush between your ears people.



's avatar #24680: PZ Myers — 05/11  at  04:57 PM
Attacks without any type of refutation.


Follow the links in my comment. You're either lying or ignorant...which is not surprising.

The Big Bang theory (actually a collection of failed theories) says that: 1st there was nothing....then it exploded.


No, it does not. Your misrepresentation of legitimate scientific theories is not grounds for doubting them.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#24682: — 05/11  at  05:06 PM
"Not if he's a well-informed programmer who has heard of genetic algorithms and evolutionary programming."

Yes, but these systems must first require a programmer to write them...interesting.

I would have expected a group of "intellectuals" like yourselves to be able to shut me up with a little more than name calling. Very sad. Your faith system collides with the truth of an omnipotent creator whom you will stand before in a short time, and that scares you (if it doesn't, you aren't paying attention).

If I am wrong, no big deal right? I die and I rot in the ground just like you do. But if you are wrong..... um....oooops.

Take care,
Garrett-



#24683: — 05/11  at  05:11 PM
Psalm 14:1 "The fool has said in his heart,
"There is no God."

Romans 1:22 "Professing to be wise, they became fools"



You have been spoken of in scripture!



#24684: Duane Smith — 05/11  at  05:26 PM
Isn't it about time for Pascal's wager to die and rot in the ground?



#24686: — 05/11  at  05:39 PM
"Isn't it about time for Pascal's wager to die and rot in the ground?"

Thats not why I have faith, and being a 4 Point Calvinist, I wouldn't try to convince you based on Pascal's philosophy either, but he makes a good point, doesn't he?



#24696: — 05/11  at  07:24 PM
Isaac Newton
Among the greatest scientific geniuses of all times, Isaac Newton made major contributions to mathematics, optics, physics, and astronomy. He discovered the law of gravitation, formulated the basic laws of motion, developed calculus, and analyzed the nature of white light. Behind all his science was the conviction that God made the universe with a mathematical structure and He gifted human beings' minds to understand that structure.

The very orderliness and design of the universe spoke of God's awesome majesty and wisdom. The design of the eye required a perfect understanding of optics, and the design of the ear required a knowledge of sounds. The solar system itself could not have been produced by blind chance or fortuitous causes but only by a cause "very well skilled in mechanics and geometry." Gravity itself was an active principle God used to impose order on the world. Seeking to understand God's methods, Newton developed formulas for specific phenomena such as ocean tides, paths of comets, and the succession of the equinoxes.

Newton spent a tremendous amount of time studying the Bible, especially the prophetic portions of Scripture. He believed history was under the dominion of the Creator, and prophecy showed how the Creator was to establish His earthly kingdom in the end. His Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended used astronomical data to argue that the Bible was the oldest document in the world and that the events of Biblical history preceded all other ancient histories.



#25340: — 05/19  at  09:32 PM
*Sigh* I just love it when evolutionists use the word "convergent". Then they go out of their way to try and "prove" that traits shaired between organisms is due to common ancestry.

Flame me, please I insist.



#25343: Duane Smith — 05/19  at  10:21 PM
Mr. Hanson,

There is no reason to flame you. At this point, it would be a waste of effort. Please take the time to read a good introductory college level biology book so you can understand "common ancestry (decent)" and "convergence" or ask a biologist what these words mean and how biologists use them to understand nature. Then repost your comment.



#25949: — 05/25  at  12:25 AM
Interesting - the dinasaur is made from how many different finds? I love archeology but finding 40 different skeletons and putting together an animal out of it doesn't seem 'solid' to me (note: I am NOT NOT NOT a creationist or 'believer').

Atheist...

Psalm 14:1 "The fool has said in his heart,
"There is no God."

I love this retort - you wanna start a scripture quote war?
Go re-read the book you 'believe' in...
http://www.sanfords.net/Framed_pages/skeptics_annotated_bible.htm



#25980: — 05/25  at  08:16 AM
(By the way, I am an educated former atheist and evolutionst). Evolution is scientifically impossible.

He must be lying. I doubt very much that he is a former atheist. I know many former creationists but no former atheists.

He also displays a disgusting lack of understanding of basic science. He really should do himself a favour and go back to school. He can question the validity of science as much as he likes just as long as he questions his religion as well, instead of swallowing it wholesale like some lobotomised cretin.



Page 1 of 1 pages

Next entry: Somebody send Behe back to Bizarro World

Previous entry: Wells and Dembski: two phonies

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college