Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Saturday, November 19, 2005

Fearless mice

I had to kill a mouse this morning. It had invaded my daughter's bedroom, and our pathetic cat was doing his usual thing of responding with frantic confusion, chasing it and batting it around uselessly—so I coolly walked in, whacked it with a broom, scooped up the sad dead little beastie (which was so warm and soft), and deposited it in the Circular Funerary Receptacle.

If Science has its way, though, this commonplace occurrence could be more stressful.

First they made mutant Mighty Mice, with huge bulgy muscles. Then they figured out how to tweak their genes to get them to regenerate. And now they've lopped out a gene to make them completely fearless.

I swear, I'm going to have to scan the literature for sabre-toothed mice, tool-using mice, and mice with homicidal tendencies. Someday I'm going to try to get rid of a rodent, and it's going to turn around and whack me with a broom.

OK, that's a little bit of an overstatement. What researchers have done is identify a molecule involved in learning, which is active in a particular pathway that is involved in fear conditioning. It's a simple situation: if you give a mouse a conditioned stimulus, like a particular sound, and then give it a nasty unconditioned stimulus, like an electric shock, it will soon learn to react fearfully to just the sound alone. This is a good thing, a sensible thing, a smart thing for the mouse to do—if you're living in a cage surrounded by sadists in white lab coats, it's a good idea to learn how to react to warning signals.

The pathways consist of somatosensory information from the cortex and thalamus, an important way station in somatosensory integration, which all converge on a structure called the amygdala, which appears to be responsible for learning the association between different stimuli. The investigators screened the mouse brain for genes that are enriched in their expression in the amygdala, and found several: one of interest is stathmin/oncoprotein 18, a phosophoprotein that is found in the cytoplasm. Stathmin is an inhibitor of microtubule formation; it basically makes the skeleton of the cell a little less rigid, a little more unstable. It's this property that may be responsible for its role as a prerequisite for learning, since it may enable new synaptic contacts to be formed.

fear pathways
Major neural pathways transmitting tone CS and foot-shock US to the amygdala. Areas in red transmit CS to the LA; areas in black transmit US to the LA. Gray arrows show the direction of sensory information. CE, central nucleus of the amygdala; S1, primary somatosensory cortex; S2, secondary somatosensory cortex; PaIC, parietal insular cortex; TE3, temporal cortex area 1; LA, lateral nucleus of the amygdala; BLA, basolateral nucleus of the amygdala; PRh, perirhinal cortex; LP, lateral posterior thalamic nucleus; PV, paraventricular thalamic nucleus; Re, reuniens thalamic nucleus; SG, suprageniculate nucleus; MGd, dorsal division of the medial geniculate nucleus (MGN); MGm, medial division of the MGN; PIN, posterior intralaminar nucleus.

So Shumyatsky et al. did the obvious thing: they created knock-out mutations of this gene. The resulting mice look normal, right down to the density of synaptic spines in their brains, and they also aren't obviously brain damaged—they can still learn to run mazes like wild-type mice, so they have retained good spatial memory. Both respond to a shock in the same way, by freezing. Where they differ is in learned and innate fear. Wild type mice learn to associate a conditioned stimulus like a tone with a shock, and will freeze in response to the tone alone. The mutant mice are significantly different, and learn much more slowly. Mice also naturally avoid open spaces, and stereotypically stick to sheltered edges and corners; this behavior can be assessed with open field and elevated mazes, and again, the mutant mice were braver and spent more time in the open.

The mice also have deficits in long-term potentiation (LTP) in the relevant areas of the brain. LTP is a critical process in generating memory which involves changes in the strength of synaptic connections that can last from minutes to years.

They have a straightforward summary of what is going on in these mouse brains.

The current models of fear memory formation suggest that US and CS convergence in the LA leads to an increase in synaptic strength in the afferent inputs to the LA, thus providing the necessary cellular basis for memory encoding. This is accompanied by the recruitment of the numerous intracellular processes, some of which are dependent on the proper function of MTs [microtubules], including local events in the synapse that require protein and RNA transport to the synapse. This transport utilizes actin filaments (located in synapses) and MTs (located in axons and dendrites and maybe in synapses in limited quantities) as tracks by which cargo-transporting motor proteins move. Taken together, our work provides evidence for the possible role of MT dynamics in the regulation of innate and learned fear. Acting without the GRP/GRPR pathway, stathmin controls innate fear. However, acting in concert with the GRP/GRPR pathway, stathmin may control fear conditioning by regulating the ability of synapses in the neural circuitry of fear conditioning to undergo LTP.

These mutants are a tool to probe the molecular mechanisms underlying learning and memory, not a fiendish plan to generate super-mice.

I guess we should be too worried yet. Even if we find a new breed of mice with massive muscles and impressive powers of regeneration, if they are fearless and strut boldly across my kitchen floor, they're still going to succumb to a little broom-whacking. Fear is a good thing for mice; it keeps them alive and out of danger.

When they start tinkering with the genes involved in growth and produce mice 12 feet tall at the shoulder, that is when we should start to sweat.


Shumyatsky GP, Malleret G, Shin RM, Takizawa S, Tully K, Tsvetkov E, Zakharenko SS, Joseph J, Vronskaya S, Yin D, Schubart UK, Kandel ER, Bolshakov VY (2005) stathmin, a Gene Enriched in the Amygdala, Controls Both Learned and Innate Fear. Cell 123(4):697-709.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/3389/anJ75LHd/

Comments:
's avatar #49780: Raven — 11/19  at  08:48 AM
our pathetic cat was doing his usual thing of responding with frantic confusion, chasing it and batting it around uselessly


Maybe your cat just needs a "life coach", PZ--I could send you my landlady's cat to mentor him. Not only is he an enthusiastic mouser, but he freelances in the neighbor's carp pond. I don't know whether the neighbor has figured out yet what keeps happening to all his fish; we're certainly not bringing up the subject.

Seriously, thanks for another interesting and accessible post.



#49787: — 11/19  at  09:50 AM
Something superficially similar may have been done through breeding, though I suspect the neurophysiological outcome was quite different:
"Rats... are tested in a situation known as the 'open field,' simply a strange large shallow box into which they are admitted and allowed to behave as they will. Fear in the open field (also called 'emotionality' or 'reactivity') is measured by observing the exploratory activity (the less exploration, the more fear) and the amount of defecation during the test, a simple indicator of autonomic nervous system mobilization preparatory to flight.
Beginning with rats that have identical scores on these measures, and then selectively breeding the ones that are more reactive and less reactive in each generation, it is easy to arrive at two distinct genetic strains, one of which is ten times more reactive than the other, in approximately ten generations. Relaxation of selection at fifteen generations leaves the strains stably far apart for at least the subsequent five generations. Cross-fostering at birth leaves the differences between the strains unaltered, showing that maternal behavior toward the young does not play a significant role in thsi disposition. Mating reactive or fearful males with nonreactive females produces offspring with intermediate fearfulness, and so does the reverse mating of fearful females with fearless males. [endnote: ... See Gray, The Psychology of Fear and Stress, chapter 4, for review of the genetic studies.]" - Melvin Konner, The Tangled Wing, pg 218



#49792: — 11/19  at  10:42 AM
Finally, more science and less Dilbert.

I love your political rants, but c'mon, the real science is far more interesting...it's all the stuff I would have learned in Bio were it not for the ADD.



#49796: bitchphd — 11/19  at  11:19 AM
Could you not have *captured* the mouse and relocated it?



's avatar #49798: PZ Myers — 11/19  at  11:34 AM
Alas, that would be futile. Winter has just struck, and this happens every year: hordes of rodents flee the hostile wilderness to take up residence in nice warm homes. Unless we wanted to set up a colony in our house, we have to be ruthless.

Shall I mail the next one to PK?

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#49799: — 11/19  at  11:48 AM
This is well beyond my distant and undergraduate knowledge of cell biology, but isn't it a bit surprising that knocking out a ubiquitously-expressed protein involved in the mitosis cycle doesn't seem to cause more systemic disruption in the knockout mice? If I understand correctly, nonphosphorylated stathmin/op18 sequesters free tubilin and thus inhibits the creation and promotes the breakdown of the mitotic spindle (the NYT article mentions Taxol/paclitaxel as "a drug that acts on the same brain molecules as stathmin does," but it sounds like stathmin/op18 acts more like colchicine). Are there compensatory molecular mechanisms at work here?



#49800: — 11/19  at  11:50 AM
"Tubulin," sorry.



#49802: Alon Levy — 11/19  at  12:02 PM
So the next Planet of the Apes remake will be Planet of the Mice, featuring giant mice keeping humans in cages and making them run around in mazes?



#49804: QrazyQat — 11/19  at  12:22 PM
Could you not have *captured* the mouse and relocated it?

We get mice in our motorhome (usually in the fall travels). A few years ago we got a mouse in the trash bag and I was able to grab it and relocate the little bastard instead of killing it. As thanks, he reentered later that night and completely chewed up a longsleeve cashmere sweater.



#49806: coturnix — 11/19  at  12:39 PM
What's that parasite that infects the rat's brain and makes it feraless of cats? Where in the brain does it settle and how does it do this? Does it lose fear of everything else, too?



#49808: — 11/19  at  12:57 PM
Toxoplasma gondii -- I couldn't help but think of that, too. But t. gondii seriously disrupts neurotransmitter functions and causes psychotic symptoms (disordered thought, visual and aural hallucinations, persistent delusions) in humans.



#49811: bitchphd — 11/19  at  01:15 PM
Well, it's true, I once rescued a mouse from my cat (who, unlike PZ's, is an accomplished hunter), It seemed unharmed, so I let it go outside and locked the cat in for a couple of hours. Only to have the cat go out and recapture the mouse within five minutes once I let her out again. At that point I figured I'd done my bit, sorry little mouse.

But yes: all future mice should be captured and mailed to PK, who would very much like them. Every time he sees a star or blows out a candle, he wishes for mice. :'(



#49812: Linkmeister — 11/19  at  01:21 PM
I left an avocado in my kitchen sink overnight yesterday and woke up to find unmistakable chewing evidence in the thing; I'm much less favorably disposed toward mice and their godawful cousins than others appear to be. My dog's a pointer, and I think her attitude is "I do birds and birds only."



#49813: Paul — 11/19  at  01:29 PM
You've gotta be careful with mice. You never know when one will turn out to be a hyper intelligent pan-dimensional being, and that would be bad.

P.S. My authentication word was 'bud.' Have you got any real beer?



#49814: — 11/19  at  01:31 PM
Toxoplasma gondii -- I couldn't help but think of that, too. But t. gondii seriously disrupts neurotransmitter functions and causes psychotic symptoms (disordered thought, visual and aural hallucinations, persistent delusions) in humans.


Out of sheer curiosity, do you know which neurotransmitters it acts upon? Sorry if I'm taking this off topic, just far too curious about neuropharmacology for my own good.

The symptoms make me think serotonin, but the "fearless" part makes me think catecholamines...but most likely I'm completely wrong.



#49815: — 11/19  at  01:43 PM
Re t. gondii and neurotransmitters: see here for a helpful citation.



#49816: — 11/19  at  01:48 PM

our pathetic cat was doing his usual thing of responding with frantic confusion, chasing it and batting it around uselessly

Feed it less.



#49817: QrazyQat — 11/19  at  01:51 PM
Another "relocation" story. In my youth I had a live trap -- not a Have-A-Heart; I wasn't made of money smile -- and the really nice old guy at the other end of the block who grew the nicest tulips I've ever seen paid me to trap a squirrel and relocate it. I did (and I could recognise onme squirrel from another back in those days -- I was a "naturalist geek") and took it to Silver Lake Park, about a mile away.

It was back the next day.

I did it again and this time did a sucessful relocation, but this involved walking 5 miles out of town to an area where there was loads and loads of open space between stands of trees (which in sountern Minnesota was rare).

I was later kinda surprised to see how far squirrels would go to get goodies when I lived in Toronto. We had squirrels running through the yard carrying chestnuts, and the closest chestnut trees were well over a quarter mile away, and across a busy road. How they knew they were there at all I don't know -- learning from mom (like good mouser cats generally do), sense of smell, I don't know.



#49818: greensmile — 11/19  at  02:35 PM
many questions prompted by this "foolhardyness" gene.

It invites a simpleton like me to stretch the result to species I care about and worry about much more. [if mice are destined to be the rulers of this planet, it isn't going to matter what I worry about anyway...here goes:]
Should I feel this supports me stroking my beard and saying "ummm hmmm, yup, I know people who are fearless because they have not learned much"?

here are three questions in particular [to be answered by noone in particular] for which I'd apprectiate any pointers to succinct and not-too-technical related/background articles.

1. does the human brain express the same or similar gene?
2. if so, does a defect or knock-out absense of this gene produce the same subtle learning disorder?
3. if so, would it correlate with antisoicial and combative behavior?

question 3, give or take a few ethical concerns, might be testable by sequencing DNA taken from prison populations and some controls...a kind of gene hunt I bet lots of people are interested in whether they dare say so or not.



's avatar #49819: PZ Myers — 11/19  at  02:43 PM
1. Yes. Here's the OMIM entry.

2. We don't know.

3. We don't know.

This is a gene that has multiple functions, and the attribute of 'fear' is going to involve more than one source: pleiotropy and multigenic effects are the norm.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#49825: coturnix — 11/19  at  03:47 PM
Never forget Pinky and the Brain!



#49835: greensmile — 11/19  at  05:23 PM
Thank you Dr. Myers.



#49839: — 11/19  at  06:20 PM
You never know when one will turn out to be a hyper intelligent pan-dimensional being
Wouldn't that be all the more reason to act swiftly with a broom, before they decide to slice and dice your brain? I was feeling sorry for the various mice until you suggested that they might be even more dangerous than PZ suspected.



#49863: — 11/19  at  10:39 PM
Give me a yell when it's time to welcome our Rodent Overlords.

-jcr



#49865: mccm — 11/20  at  12:18 AM
wow looks like i missed the mousebashing, but i had a couple things i wanted to throw in.

I went and looked at this paper real quick to get an idea what they did.
I don't know how to quote people right.. but this is a good question.
#49799: tWB — 11/19 at 11:48 AM
This is well beyond my distant and undergraduate knowledge of cell biology, but isn't it a bit surprising that knocking out a ubiquitously-expressed protein involved in the mitosis cycle doesn't seem to cause more systemic disruption in the knockout mice?

i tried to look up what kind of mice these are and it appears that they are first-generation KOs, developed in 1996 (http://www.jbc.org/cgi/content/full/271/24/14062). This means that they were made before all the sophisticated control of regional specificity and developmental timing of the knock-out came into vogue. So yeah.. you really ought to really test for non-specific effects of the manipulation before you go saying that this is a learning and memory deficit, which is really the gist of this paper.

It looks to me like all the effects in here are consistent with more general deficits either in visual or auditory cortex weakening the representation of the tone or context that rats are conditioned in. they could also be consistent with (more likely, see my latest post about the lidocaine finding i saw at SFN) a general hyperactivity in the stathmin-ko mice. since conditioned fear is measured as freezing and these anxiety tests have to do with level of exploration, this is an obvious alternative hypothesis that needs to be ruled out.

even if you got all of that done, it is soooo hard to say that stathmin is the player here because you would expect developmental compensation for the knockout. the deficits could be due to increases in a gene that is normally kept at a low level by the presence of stathmin.. that is why RNAi and viral vectors and 2nd or 3rd generation knockouts are key..

also they only report a deficit in a specific type of LTP in the specific pathway of interest. one wonders whether they tested other forms of LTP induction in other obvious places (like the perforant path into the hippocampus) and also found defects. this would not be as pretty a story if that were the case, but it might be worth testing.

word.



Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

Next entry: The EFF wants you

Previous entry: Vatican whipsaw

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college