Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Wednesday, October 27, 2004

Homo floresiensis, Flores Man

Echoed on the Panda's Thumb

A long-lost cousin has been discovered, Homo floresiensis, or Flores Man. It's especially dramatic for a number of reasons. It's relatively recent, with the youngest specimen only 18,000 years old, but it is most closely related to Homo erectus. This species was also minute, only 3 feet tall, and tiny-brained. Here we have a group of small, specialized human relatives, living contemporaneously with Homo sapiens, on isolated islands in Indonesia. It's like discovering that Munchkins were real. You can read more here:

Flores Man
The LB1 cranium and mandible in lateral and three-quarter views, and cranium in frontal, posterior, superior and inferior views. Scalebar, 1cm.

A real pleasure of working in a historical science like biology is that sometimes you can be completely surprised by some unexpected, odd, and entirely accidental discovery. Flores Man is such a wild surprise.

A new human-like species - a dwarfed relative who lived just 18,000 years ago in the company of pygmy elephants and giant lizards - has been discovered in Indonesia.

Skeletal remains show that the hominins, nicknamed 'hobbits' by some of their discoverers, were only one metre tall, had a brain one-third the size of that of modern humans, and lived on an isolated island long after Homo sapiens had migrated through the South Pacific region.

"My jaw dropped to my knees," says Peter Brown, one of the lead authors and a palaeoanthropologist at the University of New England in Armidale, Australia.

The find has excited researchers with its implications—if unexpected branches of humanity are still being found today, and lived so recently, then who knows what else might be out there? The species' diminutive stature indicates that humans are subject to the same evolutionary forces that made other mammals shrink to dwarf size when in genetic isolation and under ecological pressure, such as on an island with limited resources.

Flores Man adds an interesting twist to our hominid phylogenies. As you can see in this diagram, we now have to add this slender thread from the great Homo erectus dispersal, a relic species that survived long after it's closest relatives.

Flores Man
Homo floresiensis in the context of he evolution and dispersal of the genus Homo. a,The new species as part of the Asian dispersals of the descendants of H. ergaster and H. erectus, with an outline of the descent of other Homo species provided for context. b, The evolutionary history of Homois becoming increasingly complex as new species are discovered. Homo floresiensis (left) is believed to be a long-term,isolated descendant ofJavanese H. erectus, but it could be a recent divergence. 1, H. ergaster/African erectus; 2, georgicus; 3, Javanese and Chinese erectus;4, antecessor; 5, cepranensis; 6, heidelbergensis; 7, helmei; 8, neanderthalensis; 9, sapiens; 10, floresiensis. Solid lines show probable evolutionary relationships; dashed lines, possible alternatives.

Cryptozoologists are going to have a ball. Henry Gee already has an article up, mentioning "that other species of recently extinct humans might be discovered on other isolated islands", and even mentioning the possibility of extant hominids.

The accompanying paper on the archaeology also shows the tools found with these little hominids; these weren't simple apes. They were making some wicked weapons and carving tools.

Flores tools

Despite its ability to make tools, though, Flores Man was small-brained, small even for its diminutive size.

brain/body ratios
The relative brain and body size of H. floresiensis. The dimensions of the skull and skeleton (LB1) described by Brown et al. fall well outside the extremes seen in H.sapiens and the ‘erectines’(a range of hominin species, of which H. erectus is the most familiar). LB1 is closer in size to, but even smaller than, the australopithecines, of which the best known example is Lucy. On various anatomical grounds,however, Brown et al. believe that LB1 represents a dwarfed H.erectus.

Look at that: 1m tall, with a 380 cm3 brain. And shaped stone tools. That is simply amazing.


Flores Man reconstruction

There's also an article on Flores on the National Geographic site, including the nice reconstruction to the left.

National Geographic provided funding for the research, and are going to be airing a documentary on the subject next year.


They also summarize the little guy's life style:

The Flores people used fire in hearths for cooking and hunted stegodon, a primitive dwarf elephant found on the island. Although small, the stegodon still weighed about 1,000 kilograms (2,200 pounds), and would pose a significant challenge to a hunter the size of a three-year-old modern human child. Hunting must have required joint communication and planning, the researchers say.

Almost all of the stegodon fossils associated with the human artifacts are of juveniles, suggesting the tiny humans selectively hunted the smallest stegodons. The Flores humans' diets also included fish, frogs, snakes, tortoises, birds, and rodents.

Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Roberts RG, Sutikna T, Turney CSM, Westaway KE, Rink WJ, Zhao J-x, vandenBergh GD, Rokus Awe Due, Hobbs DR, Moore MW, Bird MI, Fifield LK (2004) Archaeology and age of a new hominin from Flores in eastern Indonesia. Nature 431-435.

Brown P, Sutikna T, Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Jatmiko, Saptomo EW, Rokus Awe Due (2004) A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 431:1055-1061.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/1454/8S95aOXb/

Comments:
#9095: — 11/16  at  02:47 PM
Wait, what about my consitutional rights under the plebiscite where I won 12-4!

Here's MattH, crossing the street to pick a fight:

Simply put, go ahead and have your last insult, think you’ve won, whatever, but it’s pretty sad when even Bob think’s you’re odd.

And I can't even fight back, now? Darn.



#9106: — 11/16  at  03:43 PM
People like me can't stand hours per day of reading text on bright white backgrounds, and set the background something less taxing on the eyes, like light grey. So bob's comments will still be obvious, for a few of us. Nevertheless, I approve of the whiteout, and that sort of policy will make the place better. Too bad there's not a way to let the individual viewer whiteout posters of his choosing.



#9117: — 11/16  at  04:50 PM
Matt; This whole thing started when you attacked Heteralocha for sharing a "theory" with which I was unfamiliar. Unlike the vast majority of Americans, I do not have a run-and-hide response to someone wielding the R word.

That said, some of us were on the subject of the Ebu Gogo, I think. As for Bob, I suggested in another Recent Article that he might be a CB troll in the Mojave, and I guess he is acting out. It's OK, I had kids in my classroom do that when their mothers had been beat up by boyfriend #325 for messing with the tweek stash.

Let's discuss the wonderful possibility that Little People or at the least, bipedal critters exist. Orang S?????? on an isle west of Sumatra?



#9152: — 11/16  at  10:06 PM
Richard (and Maciej),
Regarding Richard's comment: Gorilla Girl: Please keep writing about Savants. Ever since reading about Blind Tom they have fascinated me from the wiring harness standpoint. But, how could someone not have a corpus collosum?
I need to look this one up, as I said, but find myself in a very busy time with work just now (!), so will have to wait until the semester is done to pursue this.
From what I remember, the article said the brain connections were made somehow directly, but through another channel, perhaps not even in the usual area of the brain that is connected by cc. The idea was that information was able to travel back and forth in an unusual pathway. I will definitely get back to this one when I have more time to rummage through my savant/microcephaly articles (seems too easy to collect these days from all the great sources and journals online--hey, am I the only one addicted? Not on your aunt betty's bippy!)
Also, Oliver Sacks and his wonderfully strange patient-tales...our brains are interesting indeed! Richard, are you familiar with the works of V. Ramachandran on perception and the brain?



#9158: — 11/17  at  12:19 AM
As for the "metric shitloads of Mexicans who looked distinctly Japanese and/or Chinese", the Spanish maintained permanent contact with Asia since the 16th century on. For many years, the Phillipines was even governed from Mexico. Over the centuries, the Spanish also imported an unknown number of Chinese coolies to America. Peru recently celebrated the 100th anniversary of Chinese mass immigration. And of course, the Yakut do look Mongol (which they are).

American native genotype has been analyzed and it appears that they all descent from a small band of Yakut hunters/fishermen. There may have been a second, more recent wave, but they never reached Mexico.



#9173: — 11/17  at  09:57 AM
Gorilla Girl: Thanks for the get-back in the middle of studies. Yes, Sacks is fantastic. Have read the usual books by him but also another less academic work by Robert Jourdain, "Music, the Brain and Ecstasy" It discussed brain wiring in a way I could understand it without having to take a course in cerebral anatomy. V. Ramachandran is new to me, but won't be for long.

Jaim: Thank you for the info regarding our hemispheric aboriginal population. I knew that the Mexican government provided most Chinese currency for a century, and that the Japanese built rifles for the Mexicans (delivery was sketchy), but never knew that there was widespread immigration. Apparently there is a large Japanese community in Brazil as well. Anyway, that would certainly explain what I've seen.

I've always been a hard skeptic regarding the Yeti thing and most other cryptozoology, but this LB1 thing has my undies in a knot. I'm wondering when the next bit of juicy evidence will show up.



#9218: — 11/17  at  07:06 PM
gorrilla girl wrote: From what I remember, the article said the brain connections were made somehow directly, but through another channel, perhaps not even in the usual area of the brain that is connected by cc.

I think the issue of "directness" is probably not relevant, because the CC is just a big bundle of axons anyway. But there are other routes that connect the two hemispheres other than the CC, it's just that they play much, much smaller roles. Could it be that the article you read concerned these alternate connections simply getting beefed up?

And since you brought up Ramachandran, I have to add this little story that's at least vaguely relevant to some of the Flores man issues discussed here.

I saw him give a talk on his "phantom limb" patients once, and at the end someone said something to him like "While I don't disbelieve your claims, you really only have a couple of subjects here to make generalizations from."

Ramachandran smiled a bit as if he had a canned response to this and said "Some findings just don't require large numbers of subjects. If I was to walk in and plop a talking pig on the table you wouldn't say 'Bah! Who cares? N of 1'"

Great line smile Doesn't fundamentally address the question really, but a great line nonetheless.



#9219: — 11/17  at  07:38 PM
I don't have a brain here to work with (did I just write that?), ahem, I don't have a brain in front of me to examine, but isn't the CC pretty much all of the connection? Can information be passed via the gutty lower brainstem? There's got to be some serious scientists reading this thing. I am a dilettante (in the worst sense) and it seems most of the others on this intellectual island are students (some brilliant and some with one or two dozen 'drop before final' too many), but you would think there would be some serious and divers folks lurking. Step up!

On a strange and philo/physiological level, if there can be an 'exchange' between two creatures (locking eyes with a stranger staring at you from behind/staring through the scope and the quarry 'feels' it and bolts, picking up the phone when the other person calls, etc.), is it possible that information could be passed within the brain other than by going thru the synapses and the other liquid hardware? is it too weird to ask?



#9222: — 11/17  at  08:00 PM
"is it possible that information could be passed within the brain other than by going thru the synapses and the other liquid hardware?"

Yes. In experimental settings, split-brain patients' left and right hemispheres communicate all the time -- by talking and drawing.



#9226: — 11/17  at  08:30 PM
Besides CC there are anterior and posterior commisures directly between hemispheres, though their cross-sectional areas are much smaller. There are known case of congenital lack of CC. These patients are often asymptomatic. I remember one in Cape Town around 1987. She was girl who always achieved excellent grades at school, but at the age of 16 or 17 started to get just good grades. Concerned parents brought her for examination. MRI revealed complete lack of Cc. She is now probaly a successful adult. Lack of CC seems not to affect mental performance.



#9261: — 11/18  at  09:59 AM
Aaron: Are you saying that talking and drawing can start out as a one-side or the other activity and stimulate the other side through sensory organs? I always thought that speech was a both-sides thing, what with grammer being a form of logic and tone and diction (subjective/objective) being more artsy, but tell me more.

Dr. Henneberg: Thanks for tossing your hat in the ring. I picture you in the role of science cavalry, riding to the rescue of the ill-informed. Sort of John Wayne in a lab coat. So is the CC sort of a wire bundle within a wire bundle? Also, how does microcephaly affect the CC, if at all?



#9288: — 11/18  at  01:12 PM
Language is almost entirely a one (usually left) hemisphere beast, at least in terms of the nuts and bolts aspects (words, word meanings, syntax). You're correct about some of the pragmatic stuff being on the right, but it doesn't get you too much without the reciprocal connections to the left.

If you want to see some nifty examples of the kind of thing Aaron was talking about, check out this video from Scientific American Fronteirs. Mike Gazzaniga is about as expert as one gets in these things.

Sorry for the absurdly long link, but the website is refusing to cooperate and give me something simpler.

javascript:vi_Player('pbs-saf','player.html', 'pbssaf703', '2', '173000','780266','brain+ClipCategory%3Apsychology+ClipCategory%3Acognitive+ClipCategory%3Ascience',null,'475','460','200','10');



#9294: mattH — 11/18  at  02:22 PM
This whole thing started when you attacked Heteralocha for sharing a “theory” with which I was unfamiliar. Unlike the vast majority of Americans, I do not have a run-and-hide response to someone wielding the R word.


It certainly wasn't intended to make anyone 'run away', unless they couldn't support thier opinion, which is really all the African-Olmec thesis is. Second, and while I'll admit that it isn't fair, it was a preepmtive strike of sorts. I've done this dance before, and every time I'm accused of being a racist within three or four posts. This time I just felt like getting it out of the way first.



#9304: — 11/18  at  04:25 PM
Richard/mattH,

You guys have been at this so long over so many subjects/variations that it is getting pretty hard to tell what the point is anymore.

My two pennies.



#9305: — 11/18  at  04:42 PM
DD: OK, put another $4.97 on it, buy the Natural Light and Matt and I can get swacked and trade effete intellectual vs boorish redneck quotes while conducting a trajectory study of rimfire projectiles and their effect on aluminum cylinders. You can score based on wit and meaness.

Just had lunch with some very civilized people at one of the more charming W. LA eateries. A patio in the autumn is so pleasant.

So what's new with the Ebu Gogo? Has Teuku Jacob reached any conclusions now that he spirited away the skull? What's happening with these current reports from west of Sumatra?



#9351: — 11/19  at  02:44 AM
Yes, please, some inside information about how this is evolving. Long time nothing so interesting appeared in our field.



#9357: — 11/19  at  10:04 AM
This morning's paper had an article bolstering hope that the Tasmanian "Tiger" is still out there. Love this cryptozoology stuff, I just wish as much time was invested in it by serious scientists as by amateur enthusiasts. I can see the grant app now:

"Fly to Tasmania, Rent Land Cruiser. Spend 14 months in forest, drinking beer and tracking presumed extinct species with no taxable economic value. Turn in what's left of Land Cruiser. Recover from hangover, fly home."



#9697: — 11/25  at  03:19 AM
Sorry I'm late; couldn't find the site. The discussions of brain size brought to mind a comment that the English politician Oliver Cromwell had a brain capacity around 2000cc, and the French statesman Talleyrand had a brain capacity around 1000cc. Arguably, Talleyrand was the shrewder. And there was (is?) a Scot with hydrocephaly who performed normally, good at school and all that, but was X-rayed and found to have only a thin layer of brain tissue lining his skull, which was otherwise full of fluid. I really doubt that absolute brain size is all that vital, particularly in a population which had several hundred thousand years to optimise their energy budget. Maybe they just lost some of the old reptile brain underneath.
There was some waffle about American language (what's it doing here?) which reminded me that about a quarter of the world's languages are (or until recently were) spoken in New Guinea and Australia. Given that some of the early navigators who sailed to Australia were apparently very similar to H. erectus, it's reasonable to assume that language may have originated in the Sulu area amongst late erectus.
Comment?



#9699: — 11/25  at  07:00 AM
Captain Cook an erectus? Because if you meant the Aborigines, they were no navigators, they just walked into Australia.



#9730: — 11/26  at  01:21 AM
Not bloody likely, mate: during glacial periods thery could've walked from New Guinea, but getting to NG demanded serious navigation on good boats. And during the glacials the 12-metre tides to the south would have gone through the Wallacia channels like whitewater rivers. The Aborigines, at the time of their colonisation of Australia some 70,000 years ago, were the most technologically-advanced people on the planet.



#9733: — 11/26  at  04:47 AM
<blockquote>Matt: An anthropologist is by definition a racist, but not necessarily a bigot.blockquote>

Sorry, just spotted this. This is crap of the highest order and not something with which I know any anthropologist would agree (and believe me, I know a lot of anthropologists).

MattH is absolutely right in every respect regarding this. If I were you, Richard, I'd retract your statements before you look even more foolish than you already do.



#9780: — 11/27  at  02:40 AM
Perhaps he's confusing racism with cultural insensitivity. An anthropologist would have to live with his or her subjects for several years to get a real feeling for how the society works, and I've never met any who have that kind of commitment (or time). The only aim of the exercise is to get in there, fill in the blanks, get out, write the thesis and get the degree. I used to know a guy in NE Thailand who ran a business filling in people's blanks for them. Made up forms, filled in the blanks in whatever village the researchers wanted to use, took them around, translated local dialects. Happy customers.



#9785: — 11/27  at  10:16 AM
I suspect what he meant was that racial classification is part of the field, using inflammatory language, which is part of his style. I have heard this phrase used before in that way. Of course we have well thrashed the concept of racial classisfication in <bold>biology</bold> in a subsequent thread. I agree that he ought to step up and clarify.



#9786: — 11/27  at  10:34 AM
An anthropologist would have to live with his or her subjects for several years to get a real feeling for how the society works, and I’ve never met any who have that kind of commitment (or time). The only aim of the exercise is to get in there, fill in the blanks, get out, write the thesis and get the degree.


I'm afraid that kind of commitment is a requirement a good anthropological research. Many of the anthropologists I know spend long periods in specific areas - and this isn't merely those with tenure: I know of committed undergraduate and graduate students who've undertaken field research in difficult and/or demanding areas of the world within the confines of their course structure.



#9790: — 11/27  at  12:21 PM
I’m afraid that kind of commitment is a requirement a good anthropological research


Arrgh! Sorry. That should read: I'm afraid that kind of commitment is a requirement in good anthropological research.



Page 7 of 8 pages « First  <  5 6 7 8 >

Next entry: Hide, George, hide!

Previous entry: How do octopus suckers work?

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college