Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Wednesday, October 27, 2004

Homo floresiensis, Flores Man

Echoed on the Panda's Thumb

A long-lost cousin has been discovered, Homo floresiensis, or Flores Man. It's especially dramatic for a number of reasons. It's relatively recent, with the youngest specimen only 18,000 years old, but it is most closely related to Homo erectus. This species was also minute, only 3 feet tall, and tiny-brained. Here we have a group of small, specialized human relatives, living contemporaneously with Homo sapiens, on isolated islands in Indonesia. It's like discovering that Munchkins were real. You can read more here:

Flores Man
The LB1 cranium and mandible in lateral and three-quarter views, and cranium in frontal, posterior, superior and inferior views. Scalebar, 1cm.

A real pleasure of working in a historical science like biology is that sometimes you can be completely surprised by some unexpected, odd, and entirely accidental discovery. Flores Man is such a wild surprise.

A new human-like species - a dwarfed relative who lived just 18,000 years ago in the company of pygmy elephants and giant lizards - has been discovered in Indonesia.

Skeletal remains show that the hominins, nicknamed 'hobbits' by some of their discoverers, were only one metre tall, had a brain one-third the size of that of modern humans, and lived on an isolated island long after Homo sapiens had migrated through the South Pacific region.

"My jaw dropped to my knees," says Peter Brown, one of the lead authors and a palaeoanthropologist at the University of New England in Armidale, Australia.

The find has excited researchers with its implications—if unexpected branches of humanity are still being found today, and lived so recently, then who knows what else might be out there? The species' diminutive stature indicates that humans are subject to the same evolutionary forces that made other mammals shrink to dwarf size when in genetic isolation and under ecological pressure, such as on an island with limited resources.

Flores Man adds an interesting twist to our hominid phylogenies. As you can see in this diagram, we now have to add this slender thread from the great Homo erectus dispersal, a relic species that survived long after it's closest relatives.

Flores Man
Homo floresiensis in the context of he evolution and dispersal of the genus Homo. a,The new species as part of the Asian dispersals of the descendants of H. ergaster and H. erectus, with an outline of the descent of other Homo species provided for context. b, The evolutionary history of Homois becoming increasingly complex as new species are discovered. Homo floresiensis (left) is believed to be a long-term,isolated descendant ofJavanese H. erectus, but it could be a recent divergence. 1, H. ergaster/African erectus; 2, georgicus; 3, Javanese and Chinese erectus;4, antecessor; 5, cepranensis; 6, heidelbergensis; 7, helmei; 8, neanderthalensis; 9, sapiens; 10, floresiensis. Solid lines show probable evolutionary relationships; dashed lines, possible alternatives.

Cryptozoologists are going to have a ball. Henry Gee already has an article up, mentioning "that other species of recently extinct humans might be discovered on other isolated islands", and even mentioning the possibility of extant hominids.

The accompanying paper on the archaeology also shows the tools found with these little hominids; these weren't simple apes. They were making some wicked weapons and carving tools.

Flores tools

Despite its ability to make tools, though, Flores Man was small-brained, small even for its diminutive size.

brain/body ratios
The relative brain and body size of H. floresiensis. The dimensions of the skull and skeleton (LB1) described by Brown et al. fall well outside the extremes seen in H.sapiens and the ‘erectines’(a range of hominin species, of which H. erectus is the most familiar). LB1 is closer in size to, but even smaller than, the australopithecines, of which the best known example is Lucy. On various anatomical grounds,however, Brown et al. believe that LB1 represents a dwarfed H.erectus.

Look at that: 1m tall, with a 380 cm3 brain. And shaped stone tools. That is simply amazing.


Flores Man reconstruction

There's also an article on Flores on the National Geographic site, including the nice reconstruction to the left.

National Geographic provided funding for the research, and are going to be airing a documentary on the subject next year.


They also summarize the little guy's life style:

The Flores people used fire in hearths for cooking and hunted stegodon, a primitive dwarf elephant found on the island. Although small, the stegodon still weighed about 1,000 kilograms (2,200 pounds), and would pose a significant challenge to a hunter the size of a three-year-old modern human child. Hunting must have required joint communication and planning, the researchers say.

Almost all of the stegodon fossils associated with the human artifacts are of juveniles, suggesting the tiny humans selectively hunted the smallest stegodons. The Flores humans' diets also included fish, frogs, snakes, tortoises, birds, and rodents.

Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Roberts RG, Sutikna T, Turney CSM, Westaway KE, Rink WJ, Zhao J-x, vandenBergh GD, Rokus Awe Due, Hobbs DR, Moore MW, Bird MI, Fifield LK (2004) Archaeology and age of a new hominin from Flores in eastern Indonesia. Nature 431-435.

Brown P, Sutikna T, Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Jatmiko, Saptomo EW, Rokus Awe Due (2004) A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 431:1055-1061.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/1454/UC8PHFhw/

Comments:
#7733: — 10/27  at  05:20 PM
Maybe, if you guys explained what's so beautiful about it, I'd be more interested. But, Gollygee Willikers, you found the bones of dead, short people, with small brains, who probably make the West Texan truck drivers of today look like effin' Nobel laureates. I just don't get all the fuss.

And, Darksyde, what on earth this has to do with Iraq war or GWB I have no idea.

But, by all means, enjoy - I ain't one to rain on people's parade.



#7734: — 10/27  at  05:24 PM
Bob, you can read the Carl Zimmer article on the significance of the find, located near the top of this article. But honestly, I find myself wondering you you think it's important that anyone else should explain that to you. It's exciting to me. What do I care what gets you interested?



's avatar #7735: PZ Myers — 10/27  at  05:28 PM
Prashant: the only evidence is timing. The chronology of floresiensis's residence on the island overlaps with that of H. sapiens, but they have no evidence of direct interaction.


And everyone, could we please shun the pea-brained troll?

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#7736: teep — 10/27  at  05:29 PM
Do we know everything? Not by half, gov, and I think that's neat.

Exhibit A: The Wollemi Pine (1994)
http://www.wollemipine.com/

(Trees thought to have become extinct about two million years ago, discovered growing outside of Sydney, Australia.)

Exhibit B: The Saola/Vu Quang Ox (1992)
http://www.ultimateungulate.com/Artiodactyla/Pseudoryx_nghetinhensis.html

(How often is it that science finds a new goat-sized land mammal species, anyway?)

I think stuff like this is amazingly cool. Live hobbit-sized humans would be cooler, but I can work with interesting skulls and contemporaneous stone tools.

Bob Flynn, if science bores you, you can go watch the Red Sox win the World Series. If you're not into baseball, there's also a lunar eclipse this evening that should be visible in N & S America. Failing that, there's always trolling message boards...



#7737: — 10/27  at  05:34 PM
I'm just upset that someone beat me to registering "www.ultimateungulate.com". I wonder if ultimateungulate.net is still available...



#7739: DarkSyde — 10/27  at  05:45 PM
OK ok...I'm oficially turning my back on Bob on this thread with my arms crossed in classical Klingon exile mode. Mursctooouk!



#7740: — 10/27  at  05:55 PM
And everyone, could we please shun the pea-brained troll?

LOL! I think some of you uber-dorks would be better off, mentally, if you shunned my pea-brained, midget ancestors, toosmile



#7741: — 10/27  at  05:55 PM
It would be nice to have a firefox extension which would block the comments of previously-identified trolls. If all it did was filter out Charlie Wagner that would be worth the installation. Too bad I'm not a programmer.

I sat here thinking, why on earth would the kind of person who downplays the discovery of Homo floresiensis be at Pharyngula in the first place? It's a bit like if i went to a NASCAR site and said "Who cares about driving fast in circles?" And that's the obvious answer. He's just a creationist looking for an argument. So who cares what he says.



#7742: — 10/27  at  06:08 PM
"I doubt that we’d be able to breed them: they were relatively intelligent."
We need to remember how "other" the African slaves were as viewed by their "owners". We see their humanity, and the appalling cruelty of slavery, but the contemporary perspective was these were not human beings.
Bred in captivity, indeed.
What's exciting to me about the Flores people is how much further the definition must expand, of what it is to be human, like us, of us, what we are.
My hope is that soon that definition will lose all but its most pragmatic boundaries; that what we share with all life is exactly that - life. There is no real "other".



#7743: — 10/27  at  06:13 PM
Maybe, if you guys explained what’s so beautiful about it, I’d be more interested. But, Gollygee Willikers, you found the bones of dead, short people, with small brains, who probably make the West Texan truck drivers of today look like effin’ Nobel laureates. I just don’t get all the fuss.


I'm willing to bet that if USA Today featured a device that scratched your ass for you while you were simultaneously drinking beer and channel-surfing, you'd be ecstatic.

People get excited about different things. Many people, not just academics, get excited about things that increase human knowledge. Too bad for you if you don't. Time to start saving up for the AssScratch'O'Matic.

P.S. You're not, by any chance, a West Texan truck driver?



#7744: DarkSyde — 10/27  at  06:36 PM
“I doubt that we’d be able to breed them: they were relatively intelligent.”


Yeah...Look, you let me have one breeding pair, give me a supply of cattle prods, snickers bars, and maybe some methadone to get them nice and hooked so they won't run, and I'll give you a race of hobbits that are bred for everything from personal valets, to miniature house keepers good for getting in those hard to clean places, to professional midget gladiators in ten generations!



#7745: — 10/27  at  06:48 PM
I find discoveries like this to be both exciting and more than a little depressing. I mean, 18,000 years is nothing. They almost survived until today, but they're extinct and we'll never get to meet them.

I had the same feeling when I learned that dwarfed woolly mammoths survived on Wrangel Island at least until 4000 years ago. Crap! I'm a measly 3730 years too late to see a mammoth!



's avatar #7746: Ben — 10/27  at  06:53 PM
It would be nice to have a firefox extension which would block the comments of previously-identified trolls.

You need a browser plugin for that? My eyeballs just do it automatically now.

"The great trouble is that the preachers get the children from six to seven years of age and then it is almost impossible to do anything with them." --Thomas Edison.



#7747: Prashant — 10/27  at  06:53 PM
They almost survived until today - Nick

I wonder if any sci-fi series has touched on a present day scenario with multiple homonid species (from our own planet) living side by side. Hmm...



#7748: DarkSyde — 10/27  at  07:01 PM
I'm telling you all sick satire aside, they're almost lucky they did not survive to present day given the proclivity our species has to subjogate our own kin to hopeless servitude. There would be gigantic versions of these guys out in a stall behind our all our houses with saddles on their backs.



#7749: — 10/27  at  07:05 PM
I wonder if any sci-fi series has touched on a present day scenario with multiple homonid species (from our own planet) living side by side.


Harry Turtledove wrote a series of short stories wherein North America was populated by Homo erectus when Columbus landed in 1492. The story that I read was an alternate version of Samuel Pepys diary that describes the enslavement of the H. erectus in 17th century London



's avatar #7750: PZ Myers — 10/27  at  07:07 PM
There would be an ethical dilemma—if we did find an extant species in the genus Homo, would we have the will or the ability to protect them and set aside adequate habitat for them? If chimpanzees are any example…no.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#7751: — 10/27  at  07:42 PM
if we did find an extant species in the genus Homo, would we have the will or the ability to protect them and set aside adequate habitat for them? {/quote]

Depends how good they taste.....



#7752: DarkSyde — 10/27  at  07:57 PM
We have our first solid point by poi...buahahahahah! Ok seriously...we have our first creationist rebuttal courtesy of AOL and Jam1084, and esteemed follow of Harun Yayha

"What's funny is that it is easy to see through your attempt to play down this discovery which contradicts evolution totally. I was the FIRST to bring up this important discovery and to highlight how it disproves yet another version of the now debunked evolutionary tree/ladder!

Facts.

1. They lived 18,000 years ago about which totally turns evolution upside down yet again. ( Bring you the latest from harun yahya very soon ) Thats even more recent than Erectus, the supposed ancestor of magnon!

2. They are hobbit like which seems to conform to people described in various scriptures. It looks like there is a Middle Earth after all!

3. They are humans.

4. Dark's attempt to jump onto the story only shows his desperate confusion as to why more and more fossil discoveries turn evolution upside down.



#7753: — 10/27  at  08:06 PM
Bob says: "who probably make the West Texan truck drivers of today look like effin’ Nobel laureates."
Pal, I work with, and am friends with, an eighth-grade dropout West Texas truck driver named Delbert. Your posts here certainly make him look like a Nobel laureate - he's even a Bush supporter, too, but at least he has specks of curiosity and wonder at the world around him.

You arrogant..... never mind.



#7757: — 10/27  at  09:31 PM
You have to admire any people who had to deal with rats almost as big as they were.



#7763: — 10/27  at  11:20 PM
Finback,
That's what I feel like everytime I deal with pea-brained unter-mensch like "bob." The right-wing rats of today make me tremble from their largess.
Left-Out



#7766: — 10/27  at  11:51 PM
Yeah, it totally turns evolution upside because we believe there's like this...um...ladder, and shit just climbs up it. So, if anything steps down the ladder, we know that Jesus Christ Almighty must have come down and constructed it personally from sand and fecal material. And then, he made me and now he's probably making a web page for when he floats out of the sky, in celebration of Bush's reelection.

Creationists are a bunch of Damn retards.



#7767: — 10/28  at  12:09 AM
To put it nicely, that is...



#7768: Hank Fox — 10/28  at  12:39 AM
I have a question and a comment.

The question: I didn't read any of the articles on this yet, so I'm much less informed than any of the rest of you. The discovery sounds intriguing, but I'm thinking of a couple of parallels, and I'm not sure I can be excited about it just yet, based on what I've heard so far.

One parallel that comes immediately to mind is dog breeding. Considering that we have the huge range of dog body sizes and proportions after only a few thousand years of deliberate breeding, is it remotely possible that these little guys were actually humans? I mean, at least as much as chihuahuas are still dogs?

If you’d never seen a dog, and you came across the fossilized skull of a Great Dane and the fossilized skull of a chihuahua in the same rock stratum, would you classify them as different species? Possibly even place them each in a different genus?

Considering that we have Zulus and Pygmies on the same continent in the present time, I’m moved to wonder.

I’m interested in the thoughts of some of the rest of you.

The comment is: One of the religion chat rooms I frequent is sometimes occupied by an extraordinarily provocative little freak, X, who could make Mother Theresa scream four letter words. It occasionally happens that the entire chat room will suddenly move from the usual interesting mix of cross-talk to just Chat Room vs. X. 35 people will drop whatever they were talking about and begin responding only to him and the ridiculous things he says.

Even if you ignore him, so that he vanishes off YOUR screen, he still completely dominates the room by being the sole focus of all the other chatters. I finally learned to just leave and go do other things on the days when he was being his worst self.

Bob Flynn is a sometimes-amusing troll. And it occurs to me that, in a way, he brings out the best thought in some of you as you respond to him and his possibly-feigned perversity.

However, some part of me continues to believe there is something less-than-healthy in people who can never say anything positive or thoughtful, and live only to constantly needle others. Thinking of the example of X, it seems to me that some of these people get progressively sicker as they get greater and greater amounts of this type of reverse reinforcement.

Mainly, though, I think the day Pharyngula’s response pages become the Bob Flynn and His Dozen Angry Sidekicks Show, they will be a lot less interesting — at least to ME.



Page 2 of 8 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »

Next entry: Hide, George, hide!

Previous entry: How do octopus suckers work?

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college