Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Wednesday, October 27, 2004

Homo floresiensis, Flores Man

Echoed on the Panda's Thumb

A long-lost cousin has been discovered, Homo floresiensis, or Flores Man. It's especially dramatic for a number of reasons. It's relatively recent, with the youngest specimen only 18,000 years old, but it is most closely related to Homo erectus. This species was also minute, only 3 feet tall, and tiny-brained. Here we have a group of small, specialized human relatives, living contemporaneously with Homo sapiens, on isolated islands in Indonesia. It's like discovering that Munchkins were real. You can read more here:

Flores Man
The LB1 cranium and mandible in lateral and three-quarter views, and cranium in frontal, posterior, superior and inferior views. Scalebar, 1cm.

A real pleasure of working in a historical science like biology is that sometimes you can be completely surprised by some unexpected, odd, and entirely accidental discovery. Flores Man is such a wild surprise.

A new human-like species - a dwarfed relative who lived just 18,000 years ago in the company of pygmy elephants and giant lizards - has been discovered in Indonesia.

Skeletal remains show that the hominins, nicknamed 'hobbits' by some of their discoverers, were only one metre tall, had a brain one-third the size of that of modern humans, and lived on an isolated island long after Homo sapiens had migrated through the South Pacific region.

"My jaw dropped to my knees," says Peter Brown, one of the lead authors and a palaeoanthropologist at the University of New England in Armidale, Australia.

The find has excited researchers with its implications—if unexpected branches of humanity are still being found today, and lived so recently, then who knows what else might be out there? The species' diminutive stature indicates that humans are subject to the same evolutionary forces that made other mammals shrink to dwarf size when in genetic isolation and under ecological pressure, such as on an island with limited resources.

Flores Man adds an interesting twist to our hominid phylogenies. As you can see in this diagram, we now have to add this slender thread from the great Homo erectus dispersal, a relic species that survived long after it's closest relatives.

Flores Man
Homo floresiensis in the context of he evolution and dispersal of the genus Homo. a,The new species as part of the Asian dispersals of the descendants of H. ergaster and H. erectus, with an outline of the descent of other Homo species provided for context. b, The evolutionary history of Homois becoming increasingly complex as new species are discovered. Homo floresiensis (left) is believed to be a long-term,isolated descendant ofJavanese H. erectus, but it could be a recent divergence. 1, H. ergaster/African erectus; 2, georgicus; 3, Javanese and Chinese erectus;4, antecessor; 5, cepranensis; 6, heidelbergensis; 7, helmei; 8, neanderthalensis; 9, sapiens; 10, floresiensis. Solid lines show probable evolutionary relationships; dashed lines, possible alternatives.

Cryptozoologists are going to have a ball. Henry Gee already has an article up, mentioning "that other species of recently extinct humans might be discovered on other isolated islands", and even mentioning the possibility of extant hominids.

The accompanying paper on the archaeology also shows the tools found with these little hominids; these weren't simple apes. They were making some wicked weapons and carving tools.

Flores tools

Despite its ability to make tools, though, Flores Man was small-brained, small even for its diminutive size.

brain/body ratios
The relative brain and body size of H. floresiensis. The dimensions of the skull and skeleton (LB1) described by Brown et al. fall well outside the extremes seen in H.sapiens and the ‘erectines’(a range of hominin species, of which H. erectus is the most familiar). LB1 is closer in size to, but even smaller than, the australopithecines, of which the best known example is Lucy. On various anatomical grounds,however, Brown et al. believe that LB1 represents a dwarfed H.erectus.

Look at that: 1m tall, with a 380 cm3 brain. And shaped stone tools. That is simply amazing.


Flores Man reconstruction

There's also an article on Flores on the National Geographic site, including the nice reconstruction to the left.

National Geographic provided funding for the research, and are going to be airing a documentary on the subject next year.


They also summarize the little guy's life style:

The Flores people used fire in hearths for cooking and hunted stegodon, a primitive dwarf elephant found on the island. Although small, the stegodon still weighed about 1,000 kilograms (2,200 pounds), and would pose a significant challenge to a hunter the size of a three-year-old modern human child. Hunting must have required joint communication and planning, the researchers say.

Almost all of the stegodon fossils associated with the human artifacts are of juveniles, suggesting the tiny humans selectively hunted the smallest stegodons. The Flores humans' diets also included fish, frogs, snakes, tortoises, birds, and rodents.

Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Roberts RG, Sutikna T, Turney CSM, Westaway KE, Rink WJ, Zhao J-x, vandenBergh GD, Rokus Awe Due, Hobbs DR, Moore MW, Bird MI, Fifield LK (2004) Archaeology and age of a new hominin from Flores in eastern Indonesia. Nature 431-435.

Brown P, Sutikna T, Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Jatmiko, Saptomo EW, Rokus Awe Due (2004) A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 431:1055-1061.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/1454/Mq9ivXyW/

Comments:
#7770: Hank Fox — 10/28  at  01:10 AM
Re: Prehumans side by side with us in the world.

There's a trilogy of SF novels named "Hominids," "Hybrids" and "Humans" (not sure I have them in the right order; the author might be Robert Sawyer) that's about a suddenly-established connecting link between our world and a parallel one where Neanderthals survived instead of us ... and went on to become as technologically-advanced as we humans.

There are some neat ideas in it about the shape of their culture, moral code, etc., based on their different physical attributes, brains, senses, dietary preferences and breeding mandates.

The necessities of their breeding cycle, for instance, demand not only gay partnering but simultaneous heterosexual marriage as well. They're highly civilized city-dwellers, but also hunter-gatherers who hunt woolly mammoths for meat, and have wolves as housepets. It sounds weird, but the author makes it all work.

There are also <sly grin> some racy scenes which delve into the love affair between a female human biologist and the cough*well-endowed*cough Neanderthal physicist who accidentally established the link.

Heh. They're all atheists, by the way. They think religion looks like mild mental illness.



#7771: — 10/28  at  02:42 AM
Well, as Stephen Jay Gould repeated to the point of tedium, "human equality is a contingent fact of history".

Seriously though, how confident can we be that this isn't a hoax?



#7772: DarkSyde — 10/28  at  03:59 AM
On the hoax question; while this appears legit, there is no way to know yet. It could be a clever hoax. But there's plenty of time to figure that out and no one is making even a 'provisional' final judgment on authenticity at this time. Paleoanthorpologists are as skeptical as any other group of scientists if not more so considering Piltdown, and I suspect that the first order of business on the mind's of reviewers will be to establish that.

Hank, On the morphology side and with the understanding that I have no line drawing nor am I a pro, and I'm just looking at the pic of the skull PZ provided, the photos suggest to me that there is a suite of traits evident which are far more diagnostic of H erectus/ergaster.
Cranial cap to body size ratio, the supra-orbital ridges, what looks like an occipital torri, the lack of a chin (and I assume a simian cleft), the swept back 'no forehead' profile, and
less clear from that pic but still suggestive are the flared zygomatic arches (cheekbones) and the prognathous face-that is the face is a bit more 'tucked under' than we see in classic erectus but still juts out more than we see modern humans. The shape of the browridges are suggestive of a certain 'kind' of erectus found in China in that they're less a single supraorbital bar and more distinct above each orbit giving a doubled arched look.
Each of those traits is highly indicative of erectus/ergaster and they're all well outside of the range of variance for modern humans.
You wouldn't expect to see that suite of traits concordant with erectus in a modern human offshoot that was 'scaled down' by evolution just by coincidence but you might certainly expect to see it in a scaled down version of an erectus. IOW, again just looking at that pic, there appears to be substantially less morphological 'distance' between an erectus/ergaster and the hobbit skull than from a modern human to the hobbit skull. From what I can gather of the little written about the post crania this concordance with erectus/ergaster is present to some degree there as well.

Here is a few pictures of erectus skulls and an anatomically modern human skull you can compare to the hobbit crania.

Having said that, the plasticity here-the amount by which it varies from the range of full sized hominids-is truly remarkable even if it were to turn out to be a highly derived modern h sap and enough to support it being a new species.

The comparison to a great Dane versus say a dachshund is apt; if the only dogs we ever knew of were all fossils of large wolfish sized canids with only one known extant member being a great Dane, and we suddenly found an adult skull of a dog the size of a dachshund, we'd be just as blown away by the plasticity there as well.



#7778: — 10/28  at  07:20 AM
I have been thinking about Flores Man and it makes me sad. It's sad that he's gone, and it's sad to think that he almost certainly could not have survived much longer in any event. We present-day humans have a pretty solid history of destroying species that don't provide any immediate benefit to us. We do it casually, almost without thinking about it, like swatting a fly. And then, when some of the more responsible among us do think about it and try to save some threatened species, some of the rest of us actively try to destroy them. They got in the way of a fishing boat, or they kept us from building a dam. Or we just get a thrill from killing them.



#7789: — 10/28  at  10:13 AM
At least one professor I've read feels there is evidence the hobbit is a derived australopithicene rather than erectus. His opinion is mostly built around the cranial cap to body size ratio. It suonds less plausible on the surface, but to go from erectus to hobbit, you'd need to lose some significant brain capacity. The guys knows a hell of a lot more than I do, but seems to me that over perhaps 500,000 to 1,000,000 there would plnety of time to shed some brainage. Question would then, what was lost and how was the remainder arranged?
What might a small island dwelling erectus be able to jettison that his larger maninland dwelling cousins would need?
No endocasts out yet I take it?



#7790: Prashant — 10/28  at  10:24 AM
Hank and Nick,

Thanks for the SF pointers. The stories sound interesting...



#7791: — 10/28  at  10:27 AM
I have no line drawing nor am I a pro, and I’m just looking at the pic of the skull PZ provided, the photos suggest to me that there is a suite of traits evident which are far more diagnostic of H erectus/ergaster...

Are you sure you're not a pro? That was a very detailed assessment you gave there. I'd agree. It seems to be a miniature H. erectus skull.



's avatar #7792: PZ Myers — 10/28  at  10:35 AM
One could argue that erectus is a derived australopithecine, you know.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#7793: — 10/28  at  10:53 AM
Are you sure you’re not a pro?

I'm sure. I know maybe just enough to be completely wrong.

One could argue that erectus is a derived australopithecine, you know.

Right. For that matter so are we, which illustrates that there's been plenty of time for substantial morphological change from the basal hominid whatever species it might be in both cases.
If I'm reading the Hawks comments right, he seems to be comparing rhe hobbit crania with the Java man type erectus and noting a few anamolies. His take seems to be that the hobbit could just as easily be a derived aussie as a derived Java erectus and that the brain cap leads him to suspect the latter. Looking at the Zhoukidan erectus though it seems to me superficially to be more concordant with that clade than with java and China's a hell of a lot closer than Africa.



#7794: — 10/28  at  11:06 AM
Sorry that was garbled. Hawks is suggesting a straight derivation from an aussie as an ancestor over a Java erectus as an ancestor.



#7795: — 10/28  at  11:12 AM
<alternate reality>
Sorry folks, but this new discovery is just further support for creationism. I mean, how could those soggy bones possibly last for 18,000 years? It's obvious that they could only last for a much shorter time. What's more, any other hominid is either fully human or fully ape. There are no transitional forms.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2004/1028dwarf.asp
</alternate reality>

More seriously, how would a soggy, unfossilized bone last for thousands of years without being eaten or something?



#7797: — 10/28  at  11:16 AM
Wow. That guy wrote that the discovery attacks evolution, supports creationism, and provides evidence for YEC. These disphits would be funny, if I didn't personally know people who consider AiG a reliable scientific source.



#7798: — 10/28  at  11:39 AM
I could sort of sympathize with ID as a religious (NOT SCIENCE)belief, albeit a goofy one showing a lack of faith, but any organization that still thinks the earth is only a few thousand years old is just plain nuts. Anyone who trusts AiG to be honest is beyond any hope, I think. They're just liars, as anyone who's bothered to look up one of their facts or quotes can tell you.



#7799: mark — 10/28  at  12:53 PM
Yes indeed, about 30 years ago there was a movie about the discovery of a "less advanced" species, that were put into involuntary servitude (I think it was title "Trog" or something linke that). But the writing was weak and it did not do a very good job tackling the ethical questions.

Now, I wonder if the Flores Folks had lice?



#7800: — 10/28  at  01:19 PM
Mainly, though, I think the day Pharyngula’s response pages become the Bob Flynn and His Dozen Angry Sidekicks Show, they will be a lot less interesting ....

Sounds allright to me, Foxman -- but I was thinking Bob Flynn and His Dozen Pea-Brained, Midgets from the Paleozoic Agesmile

If this turns out to be a fraud, y'all gonna look real, real, I mean, real dumbsmile

But, again, I have no idea and con't care, and you boys don't wanna explain why this matters to normal people, so we're at an impasse.



#7802: — 10/28  at  02:03 PM
Knowing about Flores Man will not put gas in your tank, clear your complexion, pay your utility bill or find you a date. All it does is expand your intellectual horizons.



#7804: — 10/28  at  02:18 PM
He just doesn't appreciate knowledge for knowledge's sake. I bet he's never even read a textbook unless it was needed for a class.



#7806: — 10/28  at  02:34 PM
You guys know the one thing a troll can't stand? the one thing that drives them absolutely bonkers? It's to be ignored..



#7817: — 10/28  at  04:48 PM
The AiG article is most interesting - it hardly goes after us Atheistic Pinko Babykiller Evilutionists at all, and saves up its vitriol for theistic folks that don't quite agree with The Truth(TM) as revealed to true KJV readers. Funny folks over there...



#7821: — 10/28  at  05:02 PM
Teep - Please. The ability/willingness to marvel at Homo floresiensis is not mutually exclusive from the ability/willingness to marvel at the greatest comeback in sport history. Especially when it involves the baseball team one has followed from the crib, thru high school, college, grad school, to meaningless work in adult life. If Flores Man were alive today, I am certain he would have gladly sold his wicked looking tool A (see PZ provided chart above) to get a World Series ticket.



's avatar #7822: PZ Myers — 10/28  at  05:08 PM
Although, given their location, they might be much more interested in the cricket world cup matches.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#7828: — 10/28  at  05:43 PM
About what Andy said (#61), how did the bones survive this long? It seems a valid point, no matter from what viewpoint the question comes. Dismissing a question because of the ideologies of the author is poor science.

On the other side of the argument, Carl Wieland's article at AiG, which Andy links to, suggests that Flores was a human like the rest of us. The human equivalent of the chihuahua, if you like. I don't see how the 5,000 years that Wieland (as a YEC) gives as the isolation time is anywhere near enough to give rise to the extent of change that is seen in this specimen compared to Hsap.



's avatar #7830: PZ Myers — 10/28  at  05:53 PM
According to the article on the archaeology of the Lin Bua site, the skeleton was imbedded in a dark-brown silty clay, and the condition indicates that it was covered in fine sediment while still fleshed. While the bones were soft and fragile, they were also suspended in a soft matrix.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#7837: sennoma — 10/28  at  08:48 PM
I don’t see how the 5,000 years that Wieland (as a YEC) gives as the isolation time is anywhere near enough to give rise to the extent of change that is seen in this specimen compared to Hsap.

One of the Nature articles mentions the time it took the elephants to go from mammoth to morsel; I think it was on the order of 4-5,000 years.



#7841: Jesse — 10/28  at  09:34 PM
I read another article that they believed to found hair from these creatures.. That will be interesting to get back info from dna samples of this all. Its overwhelmingly interesting.



Page 3 of 8 pages « First  <  1 2 3 4 5 >  Last »

Next entry: Hide, George, hide!

Previous entry: How do octopus suckers work?

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college