Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Wednesday, October 27, 2004

Homo floresiensis, Flores Man

Echoed on the Panda's Thumb

A long-lost cousin has been discovered, Homo floresiensis, or Flores Man. It's especially dramatic for a number of reasons. It's relatively recent, with the youngest specimen only 18,000 years old, but it is most closely related to Homo erectus. This species was also minute, only 3 feet tall, and tiny-brained. Here we have a group of small, specialized human relatives, living contemporaneously with Homo sapiens, on isolated islands in Indonesia. It's like discovering that Munchkins were real. You can read more here:

Flores Man
The LB1 cranium and mandible in lateral and three-quarter views, and cranium in frontal, posterior, superior and inferior views. Scalebar, 1cm.

A real pleasure of working in a historical science like biology is that sometimes you can be completely surprised by some unexpected, odd, and entirely accidental discovery. Flores Man is such a wild surprise.

A new human-like species - a dwarfed relative who lived just 18,000 years ago in the company of pygmy elephants and giant lizards - has been discovered in Indonesia.

Skeletal remains show that the hominins, nicknamed 'hobbits' by some of their discoverers, were only one metre tall, had a brain one-third the size of that of modern humans, and lived on an isolated island long after Homo sapiens had migrated through the South Pacific region.

"My jaw dropped to my knees," says Peter Brown, one of the lead authors and a palaeoanthropologist at the University of New England in Armidale, Australia.

The find has excited researchers with its implications—if unexpected branches of humanity are still being found today, and lived so recently, then who knows what else might be out there? The species' diminutive stature indicates that humans are subject to the same evolutionary forces that made other mammals shrink to dwarf size when in genetic isolation and under ecological pressure, such as on an island with limited resources.

Flores Man adds an interesting twist to our hominid phylogenies. As you can see in this diagram, we now have to add this slender thread from the great Homo erectus dispersal, a relic species that survived long after it's closest relatives.

Flores Man
Homo floresiensis in the context of he evolution and dispersal of the genus Homo. a,The new species as part of the Asian dispersals of the descendants of H. ergaster and H. erectus, with an outline of the descent of other Homo species provided for context. b, The evolutionary history of Homois becoming increasingly complex as new species are discovered. Homo floresiensis (left) is believed to be a long-term,isolated descendant ofJavanese H. erectus, but it could be a recent divergence. 1, H. ergaster/African erectus; 2, georgicus; 3, Javanese and Chinese erectus;4, antecessor; 5, cepranensis; 6, heidelbergensis; 7, helmei; 8, neanderthalensis; 9, sapiens; 10, floresiensis. Solid lines show probable evolutionary relationships; dashed lines, possible alternatives.

Cryptozoologists are going to have a ball. Henry Gee already has an article up, mentioning "that other species of recently extinct humans might be discovered on other isolated islands", and even mentioning the possibility of extant hominids.

The accompanying paper on the archaeology also shows the tools found with these little hominids; these weren't simple apes. They were making some wicked weapons and carving tools.

Flores tools

Despite its ability to make tools, though, Flores Man was small-brained, small even for its diminutive size.

brain/body ratios
The relative brain and body size of H. floresiensis. The dimensions of the skull and skeleton (LB1) described by Brown et al. fall well outside the extremes seen in H.sapiens and the ‘erectines’(a range of hominin species, of which H. erectus is the most familiar). LB1 is closer in size to, but even smaller than, the australopithecines, of which the best known example is Lucy. On various anatomical grounds,however, Brown et al. believe that LB1 represents a dwarfed H.erectus.

Look at that: 1m tall, with a 380 cm3 brain. And shaped stone tools. That is simply amazing.


Flores Man reconstruction

There's also an article on Flores on the National Geographic site, including the nice reconstruction to the left.

National Geographic provided funding for the research, and are going to be airing a documentary on the subject next year.


They also summarize the little guy's life style:

The Flores people used fire in hearths for cooking and hunted stegodon, a primitive dwarf elephant found on the island. Although small, the stegodon still weighed about 1,000 kilograms (2,200 pounds), and would pose a significant challenge to a hunter the size of a three-year-old modern human child. Hunting must have required joint communication and planning, the researchers say.

Almost all of the stegodon fossils associated with the human artifacts are of juveniles, suggesting the tiny humans selectively hunted the smallest stegodons. The Flores humans' diets also included fish, frogs, snakes, tortoises, birds, and rodents.

Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Roberts RG, Sutikna T, Turney CSM, Westaway KE, Rink WJ, Zhao J-x, vandenBergh GD, Rokus Awe Due, Hobbs DR, Moore MW, Bird MI, Fifield LK (2004) Archaeology and age of a new hominin from Flores in eastern Indonesia. Nature 431-435.

Brown P, Sutikna T, Morwood MJ, Soejono RP, Jatmiko, Saptomo EW, Rokus Awe Due (2004) A new small-bodied hominin from the Late Pleistocene of Flores, Indonesia. Nature 431:1055-1061.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/1454/KvqVdeJa/

Comments:
#7843: — 10/28  at  10:20 PM
I knew Danny DeVito was related to erectus



#7847: — 10/28  at  11:37 PM
I think this discovery is fantastic. I think the discovery of trolls is even better. I don't understand why bob is so against this. I am religious and know evolution to be a fact. Poor Bob. He is probably blogging somebody's page about gravity disputing that.



#7849: — 10/29  at  01:09 AM
Whenever I ponder the possibility of trading my little Southern California condo for a mansion in a red state, all I have to do is read one of Bob Flynn's posts to appreciate the terrible price I'd have to pay for that mansion.

And Mr. Flynn --- You were able demonstrate your abject, willful ignorance of anything that postdates the enlightenment with your first post in this thread. So there's really no need for you for you to keep posting here.



#7851: — 10/29  at  04:11 AM
Clearly our preconceptions about brain size and intelligence, however reasonably achieved by the evidence we had, must now be discarded.
I picked up eagerly the phrase in the New Scientist Editorial: “.. local legend about Ebu Go GO, a small, waddling creature with a big appetite.” Perhaps the key to small but creative brain lies in that phrase. My hypothesis is based on the idea that large brains need lots of energy. But it must now be changed to thinking, creative brains need lots of energy.
Their diet is very different from the chimps, though they are larger. The feature article lists: juvenile dwarf stegodons, komodo dragons, fish, frogs, snakes, tortoises, birds other mammals including bats and rodents.



#7854: — 10/29  at  06:45 AM
I wonder how the brain physiology will turn out. A good question, assuming hobbits do turn out to be descendants of erectines, would be how much brain could you lose in their environment? What might an island dwelling erectus be able to do without brain wise that his larger brained cousins would retain? Did the tool making ability become much more hard wired, like a bowery bird?



#7856: Adam — 10/29  at  07:39 AM
We should've listened to the birds. Talking parrots, clever crows and all those avian-smarts packed into teeny, tiny skulls. Homo floresiensis shows us that mammals can do it too.

BTW the skull reminds me so much of ER1813.



#7877: — 10/29  at  11:29 AM
"this is really scary because it is a sign that satan is putting pretend fossils on the earth again -- just like he did in the nineteenth century when people stopped believing in the flood. i do though think it means that bush is going to win the election because he is the one who is supposed to be here when jesus comes back because he can bomb the bad people and make way for the temple to be rebuilt."


Just thought I'd share that with you folks. Spotted it on a Christian site.



#7879: — 10/29  at  11:32 AM
I wonder how the brain physiology will turn out. A good question, assuming hobbits do turn out to be descendants of erectines, would be how much brain could you lose in their environment? What might an island dwelling erectus be able to do without brain wise that his larger brained cousins would retain? Did the tool making ability become much more hard wired, like a bowery bird?

Part of a lecture I attended today was on Liang Bua. Interestingly for the australopith hypothesis, LB1 has maxillary pillars (which are a feature of the nasal region of the skull): something australopiths have but that Homo does not.
Obviously we brought up the brain size issue. One possibility is that LB1 is actually rather tall for the population. Another point that was raised is that these skeletons are associated with hafted tools, previously only ever associated with moderns. Now obviously a date of 18,000 years ago allows for a long overlap with moderns. So there's a lot of caution about what we can infer from all of this.



#7880: — 10/29  at  11:39 AM
LB1 has maxillary pillars (which are a feature of the nasal region of the skull): something australopiths have but that Homo does not.

Dayum, that is very suggestive. Aussies would have had to been spread out over Asia one would think for a pop to end up on Flores.



#7884: — 10/29  at  11:52 AM
Dayum, that is very suggestive. Aussies would have had to been spread out over Asia one would think for a pop to end up on Flores.

Yep, concensus is that <i>H. floresiensis<i> is derived from ancestral erectus population.



#7885: — 10/29  at  12:05 PM
Not to be a labler but the classical categories are all I have to work with tiger. My understanding, as poor as it is, is that asian/erectus were thought to evolve from ergasters that moved in into asia. If so, would LB1 be part of that linneage? Or would they perhaps be part of an earlier and at this time unknown migration to Asia from Africa of a rudolfensis/afarensis kind of critter or what?



#7888: — 10/29  at  12:30 PM
My understanding, as poor as it is, is that asian/erectus were thought to evolve from ergasters that moved in into asia. If so, would LB1 be part of that linneage?

That's pretty much it, although there is a bit of an "or what" in that perhaps H. floresiensis may be related to a dispersal of a diminutive Homo species. There's apparently some small remains that have come out of the Dmanisi excavation in Georgia, and some very small remains associated with tool deposits in Olorgasailie in Africa (not sure exactly where that is). (Genus Homo more of a bush than a steady "progression", there).

Again, although these are some alternative hypotheses, AFAIK: concensus is that this is most closely related to Asian H. erectus and the close association with dwarfed island species makes similar ecological adaption a compelling argument.



#7933: — 10/30  at  12:49 AM
The Flores find shows that our evolution was not an unidirectional ascent from animal to man, as seen for example in Kubrick's film "2001", but a rather confused affair. From now on, no one can be certain that a more evolved Homo will be more sapiens ...



#7945: — 10/30  at  11:39 AM
I am an "oridinary person", just a 6th grade math teacher with an MA in "Economics!", but I find this all extrememly fascinating! I have spent hours this morning following links till I found your discussion. Curiosity and interest can abound in all of us.



#7972: — 10/31  at  05:55 AM
New Scientist 30th October 2004, p 43 explains (not in relation to H. Floresiensis) that small size is way of keeping cool in high humidity. Reduced body mass reduces heat production. That’s why pygmies are small. In the tropical rainforest there’s no wind to blow cool by sweating.



#7974: — 10/31  at  10:35 AM
That birdbrained Flores woman refutes the idea of progress in human evolution, that intelligence has selective value.

John Hawk writes "LB1 must have undergone selection in favor of smaller brains." Obvious. "It is hard to imagine this kind of selection significantly affecting a primate." Not so obvious. Most of our brain activity takes place to impress people around. That feature loses its usefulness in a very small and isolated island. LB1 had to adapt to a limited social circle with no subject for conversation.



#7990: — 10/31  at  09:20 PM
Userfriendly has another artist's impression.



#7998: wazza — 11/01  at  07:15 AM
There's not necessarily "progress" in evolution, it's not linear! There are evolutionary dead ends. H.sapiens could actually be another.



#8051: — 11/01  at  07:20 PM
No los llamen prehumanos. Ellos son tan humanos como H. sapiens, solamente son otro genero H. floresiensis, posiblemente más inteligentes de lo que su pequeño serebro pueda hacer creer, así como algunos cuervos, loros, papagayos y demuestran un alto nivel de inteligencia. H. floresiensis probablemente fue sometido a presiones evolutivas que intensificaron la eficiencia de su cerebro que quizás sería más eficiciente por unidad de peso que el de H. sapiens, de igual forma que el de H. neandertalis posiblemente fuera más ineficiente aunque fuese más grande que el de H. sapiens.



#8168: — 11/03  at  12:14 AM
Haroldo, Por que el cerebro del floresiensis seria mas eficiente en terminos de inteligencia/peso que el del neanderthalis? Cual es la relacion tipica en el genero Homo?



#8331: — 11/05  at  04:43 PM
Regarding the Ebu Gogo, it seems as if a number of folks are adopting the "Oh, how cute— hobbits" thing a little too whole heartedly. I mean, if your a herring, a frigging harp seal is as terrifying a monster as your likely to see. These guys used serious edged weapons on big game. Who's to say they wouldn't treat even smaller versions of them/our selves as Chicken McFlores? Why do we accord them automatic noble-savage status? What if they were nasty little bastards without the morality of your garden-variety serial killer? Maybe H. magnon did them in when possible because they were a pain in the food cache?
If they were around today, would the locals use rimfire or centerfire?
Early writings regarding the various pygmy populations strewn across the globe have one thing in common: ferocity (and probably with good reason). Is it remotely possible that modern (this question is both rhetorical/philosophical and open— I don't know enough about what makes a modern pygmies different in the DNA sense) pygmies are a cross? They exist in the same conditions and part of the globe, Malaya, Nicobar and the P.I.. Maybe Ebu Gogos bred in that ferocity as well as size?
As for time-to-morph, many Central American Indians (Olmecs?) already show signs of changing into the Uniform Tropical Human— full lips, darker skin, tightly curled hair, wide nose— after 12,000 years or less. Ditto the Dravidians, longer for Australasians/Melanesians. Speaking of which, has Jarod Diamond (Guns, Germs and Steel) written anything on this?

OK, so if they do turn up, don't have speech and can be bred, can we have a season? smile



's avatar #8333: PZ Myers — 11/05  at  05:03 PM
I certainly don't give them noble-savage status. They were probably smart, vicious, ruthless...just like us.

And no, they aren't a cross. Pygmies are fully human, members of the species Homo sapiens. They are us. H. floresiensis has distinct skeletal morphology; they are not us.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#8334: DarkSyde — 11/05  at  05:15 PM
Is it remotely possible that modern (this question is both rhetorical/philosophical and open— I don’t know enough about what makes a modern pygmies different in the DNA sense) pygmies are a cross?

I suppose anything is possible. But it's unlikely that modern humans commingled genetic material with floresienis. We have a fair handle on recent human lineage's across the globe because of painstaking analysis of genetic material. We're all 100% h. sapien. Eskimos, African bushmen, and Australian aborigines, are genetically more closely related to one another than two random chimpanzees from neighboring troops are related to each other. Modern humans seem to have grown from a relatively small population in east Africa; perhaps 5,000 to 20,000 individual max. African bushmen, one group of what folks think of when they think of pygmies, are the oldest extant human population on earth.

We do share a geologially recent common ancestors with LB1 so we definitely share genetic material with them. How much we can't be certain of until, and if, we get some intact sequences with which ti compare and contrast. Where exactly that ancestor is in the pyhlogeny is something some of us have been speculating on. But it's likely no more recent than homo ergaster, roughly 1,000,000 years ago.
Indigenous populations are sometimes recorded as being ferocious in there first contracts with civilization. It's certainly possible they were at times. Paleo-Indian populations for example would have had their crazy and violent members just as modern populations do. But I wouldn't be surprised if one of the reasons indigenous populations were perceived as 'ferocious' by westerners was because westerners had a tendency to consider them animals and slaughter/enslave them, take their land, etc., not to mention it's easier to justify genocide when you advertise you adversary as a 'ferocious bloodthirsty savage'.



#8337: — 11/05  at  06:16 PM
Thanks to you who answered part of my questions, and for clarifying some things. I do disagree with the "lack of differences" idea. The "we're all pink underneath" pablum ignores very strong— and wonderful— differences between human forms. The Bushmens' stygiptia (sp?), the Inuits' sub-cutanious fat layer, the Altaians' dearth of pain receptors and the Bantus' suseptability to valor/hypnosis/hysteria/passion (all linked mental mechanisms). These differences tell a fantastic story of successful adaptation. Studying people's differences is fascinating and normal. Television is just a lazy form of "people watching" which my mother considered a perfectly normal and educational diversion.

I can picture an Ebu Gogo mother taking her children to the water hole and pointing out the variations of grooming, tools and use of materials used by other Ebu Gogos from friendly bands so that her children could know a source of refuge in times of want or danger.

As such identifying differences between groups and members of groups is a very important survival skill. In war, you strive to identify any group in the distance— especially those headed in your direction— as friend, foe or degrees of both. Every nuance of behavior, dress, weaponry and even the manner of walking is examined. H. sapiens is programmed to examine differences, and certainly so was the Ebu Gogo.

On reflection of Darksyde's comments, the documentation (propoganda?) of ferocity is probably a bit of all that you mentioned. Also, an earlier comment about the carelessness of our elimination of other species was chilling.

This discovery is truly marvelous as another chapter opening to us so that we may know ourselves a bit more intimately, to measure ourselves against the test of time and wonder what will become of us, and if it is not to be OUR descendants, then who will be examining our bones and wondering why WE came up short on the scale of evolution.

Religion and Science are both attempts to explain our world and we must remember that the first men who founded and developed the theories concerning evolution were deeply religious Christians who saw no conflict between the two.

That said, if we did have a season, I'd have my Ebu Gogo as a shoulder mount on the wall, flaked-chert spear in hand, posed alert and turning toward danger.



Trackback: The Hobbits from Flores Tracked on: Prashant Mullick's Weblog (64.246.54.74) at 2004 10 27 17:38:06
If this isn't the biggest news in anthropology circles I don't know what else is. Here is what they are saying about it. The discoverer, Peter Brown: Finding these hominins on an isolated island in Asia, and with elements of modern human behaviou...



Page 4 of 8 pages « First  <  2 3 4 5 6 >  Last »

Next entry: Hide, George, hide!

Previous entry: How do octopus suckers work?

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college