Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Monday, October 17, 2005

How to euthanize a fish

Idyllopus asks a good question: how do you humanely euthanize a fish? As a fish biologist, I get this question fairly often.

Another question I get is, "Fish can't feel pain, right?" It's usually phrased exactly that way, too—they aren't looking for an accurate answer, they're looking for a reassurance that casual brutality towards cold and slimy creatures is acceptable. The actual answer, though, is "Of course they can feel pain, you clueless boob! Mind if I put this barbed hook through your lip?"* The fish cutaneous sensory network is intricate and exquisite, and they react vigorously to noxious stimuli. We often don't recognize their responses because fish faces are rather expressionless, but if you're in the know you learn to notice the signs. Zebrafish, for instance, blanch noticeably when they're stressed or fearful or in pain.

So how should one kill a fish? People recommend some incredibly brutal methods. Throw them in a blender, they say, it's quick—yeah, and I imagine that throwing cats in a woodchipper would be quick, too, but no one suggests that humane societies should adopt it. There's also the 'club them over the head' method, or 'pick them up by the tail and whack them hard against a table edge'. Those work, if the executioner is swift and sure, which most people aren't. In most cases you end up with a fish frantically flopping on the table, or a bleeding mess of an animal that's feebly twitching, so you have to whack it a few times. (This is how my father and I used to kill salmon, though: we had a heavily weighted club, and we were also very quick and confident.) I think plucking an aquatic animal out of its environment and swinging it through a hostile atmosphere also counts as inhumane.

Less nasty techniques are the freezer and alcohol strategies. I don't think putting a fish in a freezer is humane: they don't seem to react strongly to slowly freezing to death, but then they can't—their metabolism is shutting down. Fish tend to be very sensitive to cold, though, and seek out optimal temperatures and avoid the cold, and can respond to changes of a few degrees with shock, so I have my doubts that this is a good way for them to go. Putting them in water with a few percent alcohol might be OK; they do get drunk, pass out, and die, just like people can.

Here's the way I euthanize fish, though, and since I've killed many thousands, I can say it's the cleanest, least painful way to do it, for both me and the fish. It's an anesthetic used for frogs and fish that goes by various names: ms222, MESAB, 3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester, tricaine methanesulfonate, or, as most of the pet and aquaculture supply houses call it, Finquel. For routine anesthesia, I use a 0.2% solution of the stuff—let a fish swim in it for a few minutes, they lose consciousness, you can do various surgeries on them, and then put them in clean fresh water, and a few minutes later, they're awake and swimming around again. If I need to euthanize them, I use a 0.4% solution (or more crudely, I use my 0.2% stock and sprinkle a few extra crystals of the ms222 powder in the beaker), put the fish in it, they fall asleep…and after 3-5 minutes, their heart stops. It will kill them at lower doses, but simply takes longer.

I get my stuff from Sigma, catalog number a-5040, for those of you who can purchase through academic suppliers. Otherwise, here are a few commercial places that will sell it to you: Doctors Foster & Smith, PondRX, and Argent Labs. It's about $15-20 for a 5 gram bottle, which sounds expensive, but a little goes a very long ways. I bought a 25 gram bottle 8 years ago, and I've still got lots left…and I euthanize fish far more often than your usual pet fish owner.

It's good to be prepared, too. Several years ago, my colony was suddenly struck with hemorrhagic septicemia, a bacterial infection that causes blood vessels to rupture and fish to die slowly and unpleasantly and messily, and after spending days trying to treat it with antibiotics and water changes and new tanks and hoses and so forth, I had to spend a sad afternoon putting about 400 fish out of their misery. Using an anesthetic in bulk was the only reasonable way to do it.


*While I am fully aware that fish can feel pain, I still enjoy fishing and eating fish. I just don't delude myself into thinking the fish are enjoying themselves in a friendly tussle out there on the end of the line.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/3153/p268Raao/

Comments:
#44155: coturnix — 10/17  at  08:23 AM
No matter how reasonable your post, expect indignant animal rightist to appear here with far more venom than any wingnut creationist can ever summon.



#44156: — 10/17  at  08:28 AM
How do you do surgery on a fish while keeping water flowing over the gills? I can't imagine you'd be able to see clearly enough underwater to keep the fish there while you made your cuts, but it doesn't take very long to suffocate one in the air, either.

Rrawr!



's avatar #44158: PZ Myers — 10/17  at  08:37 AM
Very, very quickly.

Actually, most of my work is on larvae and embryos. They're small and don't need any special water flow.

Back when I was doing big brain work, often the surgeries were lethal. I'd knock 'em out, open up the throat, stick a needle in the bulbus, nick a vein, and start perfusing the circulatory system with saline and fixative. (Those animal rightists are dying of apoplexy right now, Coturnix.)

Otherwise, though, I had a peristaltic pump. Fit the outflow end to the fish's mouth, let the water flow though and over the gills and spill over into a reservoir tank with an air bubbler on the floor, and the inflow tube sucked up freshly aerated water from that tank.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#44161: coturnix — 10/17  at  08:52 AM
I've helped a friend do that kind of brain perfusion on turkeys! That was a big mess, but veins are HUGE so it's easy.

I had to do my surgeries (on 100g birds) with inhalation anaesthesia. That's fun (not!).



#44162: — 10/17  at  08:53 AM
"yeah, and I imagine that throwing cats in a woodchipper would be quick, too, but no one suggests that humane societies should adopt it."

I hate to burst your bubble, but a few years ago, the papers reported that animal control at Schiphol airport in the Netherlands got stuck with a large number of little critters (something like hamsters, but I don't remember that exactly) who had to be euthanised. Guess how they did it? Yup, with a woodchipper. Standard procedure they said. It did cause a bit of a riot, but my guess is that if they do it/ did it, other places probably do it too.



#44165: — 10/17  at  09:08 AM

*While I am fully aware that fish can feel pain, I still enjoy fishing and eating fish. I just don't delude myself into thinking the fish are enjoying themselves in a friendly tussle out there on the end of the line.



Then, too, Mowgli was taught the Strangers’ Hunting Call, which must be repeated aloud till it is answered, whenever one of the Jungle-People hunts outside his own grounds. It means, translated, “Give me leave to hunt here because I am hungry.” And the answer is, “Hunt then for food, but not for pleasure.”


--The Jungle Book by Rudyard Kipling



#44172: — 10/17  at  10:08 AM
I work with thousands of zebrafish in a lab at the NIH and when I need to do surgery (usually finclipping for PCR screens) I knock-em out with a dilution of buffered Tricaine (160 ppm). They come to after about 30 sec. in fresh water. Adding MS222 crystals directly to the water is viewed by the ethics board at the NIH as inhumane b/c its not buffered so its caustic, and high concentrations in some parts of the beaker will lead to overdosing, again bad.
I've worked in petshops for many years and we always used to put sick fish in a bag of water and then into the freezer, though I can see the potential for distress. Another option is to sever the spinal cord with a scapel.
But what to do when fishing? Leaving them strung on a gill line is absolutely inhumane.



#44175: rob loftis — 10/17  at  10:12 AM
The philosopher Gary Varner has argued that although fish feel pain, they do not desire for the pain to end. His argument rests on the claim that to count as having a desire, one has to pursue an aim with a certain amount of intelligence. Behavior that can be explained in terms of Skinner type conditioning does not count as desirous. Fish, he claims, do not have the cognitive equipment to have desires. (I can’t remember if this is all fish, or just, like, cartilaginous fish or something.) Thus fish feel pain, but do not desire it to end.



#44176: rob loftis — 10/17  at  10:13 AM
I don’t want to be the crazy animal rights guy, because I’m a pharyngula fan, but I will point out that, although the suffering of the fish in the lab may serve a purpose that can’t be obtained any other way, the suffering of the fish you have for dinner is completely pointless.



#44180: — 10/17  at  10:31 AM
We use clove oil as an anaesthetic for procedures done on fish out in the field, as Canadian Fish and Wildlife frown strongly on releasing any fish dosed with TMS out into streams rivers or lakes.



#44181: protected static — 10/17  at  10:39 AM
When we had a koi pond, all our reference books suggested using pond-conditioning salt for euthanasia... You use it when you introduce fish to the pond to encourage mucous formation on their gills & scales; the thinking of the book authors was that by OD'ing their environment with the salt, the fish suffocate gently, kind of like a barbituate overdose.

I don't know if this is true or not - but it certainly didn't seem to distress the fish on the few occasions when we had to kill them.



#44185: — 10/17  at  10:59 AM
the suffering of the fish you have for dinner is completely pointless.


Only if they tasted bad.

Mike (about to chow down on a bisque of lobster, crab, scallops, shrimp and halibut)



Trackback: In case you were wondering Tracked on: War Liberal (70.84.59.4) at 2005 10 17 11:03:38
Pharyngula::How to euthanize a fish Another question I get is, "Fish can't feel pain, right?" It's usually phrased exactly that way, too—they aren't looking for an accurate answer, they're looking for a reassurance that casual brutality towards cold and slimy creatures is acceptable. The actual answer, though, is "Of course they can feel pain, you clueless boob! Mind if I...



#44186: — 10/17  at  11:06 AM
Back when I kept pet fish (late 90s), the pet-store style literature I read always seemed to recommend a quick decapitation using a large knife on a cutting board. Not for the faint of heart I suppose.



#44188: — 10/17  at  11:34 AM
I can testify from personal experience that clubbing is not an effective method for killing bluefish. It just stuns them for a few seconds, and then they get mad.



's avatar #44193: — 10/17  at  11:46 AM
I don’t want to be the crazy animal rights guy, because I’m a pharyngula fan, but I will point out that, although the suffering of the fish in the lab may serve a purpose that can’t be obtained any other way, the suffering of the fish you have for dinner is completely pointless.
I have to disagree that the fish you eat has more point than the fish in the lab, simply because a fish in a lab may or may not yield something usefull to the researcher were as the fish any one in the world eats will always satisfies a hunger and even keep someone alive.

On topic of fish euthanasia I have heard from a couple of different sources that laying the fish on some ice and crush it with another piece of ice, presumably the ice was supposed to numb the fish so it wouldn't feel anything but I think it was more about making the owner feel better about doing the deed because “it's ok it's numb and won't feel you killing it and it’s less messy and scary than some others like decapitation.” In the end most forms of fish euthanasia done as humanely as possible are probably better than slowly being eaten over a couple of days by the rest of the tanks residents which was the usual fate for any ill of unhealthy fish, often one fish being picked on by the others was the first sign of an illness.

“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts.” - Bertrand Russell



#44196: — 10/17  at  12:07 PM
I can testify from personal experience that clubbing is not an effective method for killing bluefish. It just stuns them for a few seconds, and then they get mad.


Exactly how big are bluefish?



#44201: — 10/17  at  12:23 PM
because a fish in a lab may or may not yield something usefull to the researcher were as the fish any one in the world eats will always satisfies a hunger and even keep someone alive.

But the point is that one could choose to eat lentils instead of the fish and serve the same purpose of satisfying hunger and providing energy; whereas the knowledge gained from the use of a fish in the lab presumably cannot be obtained in any other way. (Whether or not you agree that said knowledge justifies the use of the animal is another question entirely.)



#44202: — 10/17  at  12:25 PM
bluefish are some mean mo-fo's with sizeable teeth.
Also, I think what Loftis is saying, is a general assumption (based on a little research) that teleosts don't have the capacity to suffer; That is they don't experience past, present and future the way we do. Although they can experience pain, they don't remember what it felt like, and they can't see more of it coming. There is no brain stuff that accounts for continuation of the experience. Thus, its assumed that they can't experience suffering as defined along a temporal linear plane.
The capacity for pain that lies in the space between (in the moment) has been empirically demonstrated by stinging the snout of trout with bee venom and measuring well-known short and long term stress indicators.



#44203: mccm — 10/17  at  12:29 PM
just for my entertainment's sake... three questions..
1) do 4 month old human embryos feel pain?
2) would the aspca take action against a person who routinely tortured fish today in ways that produced the most visible writhing and blanching possible?
3) do clams feel pain?

i'm interested in seeing which of these are so obvious that the answer is going to include the word 'boob'.
i agree you shouldn't fight your desire to not be cruel, but for all practical purposes i think its reasonable to assume fish do not feel pain in any way that is philosophically important, which is the question i really think people are asking you when they bring it up.



#44208: — 10/17  at  12:45 PM
But the point is that one could choose to eat lentils instead of the fish


"Carrot juice constitutes murder V8's genocide"



#44210: Brian — 10/17  at  12:57 PM
PZ-

Thanks for writing that.

We've always used the sharp knife method that Phobos talked about above; but not too long ago the large Pleco in our tank was dying and we had to take it out.

Well, suffice to say I didn't do a good job, and it ended up a sizable mess. Plecos are much more heavily armored than most fish, and this was a big one.

And he obviously felt what I was doing. Aggh.



#44211: rob loftis — 10/17  at  01:00 PM
mccm, a recent meta-level study in JAMA said that the evidence points to fetal sentience arriving around week 29. NYT write up here. Older literature on human sentience will even assert that newborn babies do not feel pain. Thus infant surgery was done without serious anaesthesia for a very long time.

I'm actually underwhelmed by the recent JAMA study. It relies mostly on the fact that a certain circuit that we have identified is not active until week 29, but it doesn't do a good job of ruling out other circuits.

Also: my point about the utility of eating fish was seperate from my point, stolen from Gary Varner, that fish may have no desires. In fact, if fish have no desires, the might not have any moral status at all.



#44216: Mrs Tilton — 10/17  at  01:13 PM
I've asked about this before elsewhere, but in case there are any invertebrate biologists hanging around here, I'll ask again. What's the quickest and most merciful way to snuff a spider? Other than total squashing with a very fast shoe, that is; we wish them to remain intact.

Most everybody simply tosses them into alcohol (ethanol 70%-80%, or else isopropanol to kill and cure for a few days, then ethanol to preserve). One doesn't need PZ's subtle eye for zebrafish emotions to see that spiders dislike this treatment. They thrash about madly for a while before succumbing (some die, or at least cease struggling, within a few seconds; others keep twitching for a couple of minutes).

Though spiders clearly react badly to alcohol, it's another matter altogether to infer they have a subjective experience of suffering. Some entomologists of my acquaintance have told me it's unlikely spiders (and other arthropods) have any self-awareness as we know it. Descartes was clearly wrong to think that all animals are automata, but it's not so clear he was wrong when it comes to arthropods.

Even so; if anybody knows of a good way to euthanise a spider, I'd be glad to hear of it. (Killing jars of the sort one uses on insects do not, so I've read, work well with spiders.) Perhasp these animals do not know distress as they die. But on the off chance they do, I'd as soon kill them (when they need to be killed) humanely.



#44217: Bob Davis — 10/17  at  01:13 PM
Since my box turtles aren't good at catching goldfish I found they would eat them if they were dead. So I decided the easiest way to kill them (easy for me) was to freeze them. But this seems cruel. So I sucked it up and decided to chop their heads off with one fast chop. To hold them in place I wrap them in plastic first. Works like a charm. And the turtles love them with a little blood flowing. (Turtles can see red!) Delicious!



Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

Next entry: Nice table

Previous entry: Carnival of the Godless #25

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college