Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Monday, October 17, 2005

How to euthanize a fish

Idyllopus asks a good question: how do you humanely euthanize a fish? As a fish biologist, I get this question fairly often.

Another question I get is, "Fish can't feel pain, right?" It's usually phrased exactly that way, too—they aren't looking for an accurate answer, they're looking for a reassurance that casual brutality towards cold and slimy creatures is acceptable. The actual answer, though, is "Of course they can feel pain, you clueless boob! Mind if I put this barbed hook through your lip?"* The fish cutaneous sensory network is intricate and exquisite, and they react vigorously to noxious stimuli. We often don't recognize their responses because fish faces are rather expressionless, but if you're in the know you learn to notice the signs. Zebrafish, for instance, blanch noticeably when they're stressed or fearful or in pain.

So how should one kill a fish? People recommend some incredibly brutal methods. Throw them in a blender, they say, it's quick—yeah, and I imagine that throwing cats in a woodchipper would be quick, too, but no one suggests that humane societies should adopt it. There's also the 'club them over the head' method, or 'pick them up by the tail and whack them hard against a table edge'. Those work, if the executioner is swift and sure, which most people aren't. In most cases you end up with a fish frantically flopping on the table, or a bleeding mess of an animal that's feebly twitching, so you have to whack it a few times. (This is how my father and I used to kill salmon, though: we had a heavily weighted club, and we were also very quick and confident.) I think plucking an aquatic animal out of its environment and swinging it through a hostile atmosphere also counts as inhumane.

Less nasty techniques are the freezer and alcohol strategies. I don't think putting a fish in a freezer is humane: they don't seem to react strongly to slowly freezing to death, but then they can't—their metabolism is shutting down. Fish tend to be very sensitive to cold, though, and seek out optimal temperatures and avoid the cold, and can respond to changes of a few degrees with shock, so I have my doubts that this is a good way for them to go. Putting them in water with a few percent alcohol might be OK; they do get drunk, pass out, and die, just like people can.

Here's the way I euthanize fish, though, and since I've killed many thousands, I can say it's the cleanest, least painful way to do it, for both me and the fish. It's an anesthetic used for frogs and fish that goes by various names: ms222, MESAB, 3-aminobenzoic acid ethyl ester, tricaine methanesulfonate, or, as most of the pet and aquaculture supply houses call it, Finquel. For routine anesthesia, I use a 0.2% solution of the stuff—let a fish swim in it for a few minutes, they lose consciousness, you can do various surgeries on them, and then put them in clean fresh water, and a few minutes later, they're awake and swimming around again. If I need to euthanize them, I use a 0.4% solution (or more crudely, I use my 0.2% stock and sprinkle a few extra crystals of the ms222 powder in the beaker), put the fish in it, they fall asleep…and after 3-5 minutes, their heart stops. It will kill them at lower doses, but simply takes longer.

I get my stuff from Sigma, catalog number a-5040, for those of you who can purchase through academic suppliers. Otherwise, here are a few commercial places that will sell it to you: Doctors Foster & Smith, PondRX, and Argent Labs. It's about $15-20 for a 5 gram bottle, which sounds expensive, but a little goes a very long ways. I bought a 25 gram bottle 8 years ago, and I've still got lots left…and I euthanize fish far more often than your usual pet fish owner.

It's good to be prepared, too. Several years ago, my colony was suddenly struck with hemorrhagic septicemia, a bacterial infection that causes blood vessels to rupture and fish to die slowly and unpleasantly and messily, and after spending days trying to treat it with antibiotics and water changes and new tanks and hoses and so forth, I had to spend a sad afternoon putting about 400 fish out of their misery. Using an anesthetic in bulk was the only reasonable way to do it.


*While I am fully aware that fish can feel pain, I still enjoy fishing and eating fish. I just don't delude myself into thinking the fish are enjoying themselves in a friendly tussle out there on the end of the line.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/3153/aZ90S0jZ/

Comments:
#44218: — 10/17  at  01:17 PM
>Exactly how big are bluefish?

Exactly the same size as the all other bluefish in that school.



#44220: — 10/17  at  01:25 PM
This is how my father and I used to kill salmon, though: we had a heavily weighted club, and we were also very quick and confident.

In Norway, I was taught to rapidly break the fish's neck. For really large fish, it was necessary to first nick the isthmus (I think that's the right term -- the little bit of tissue where the two gill clefts meet ventrally). The technique works fine with Salmonidae and Gadidae, but grasping spiny fish like bass can be painful if not done carefully.

I'm not positive that it is more humane than clubbing, but if done with confidence, it always works first time. Either technique has got to be better than tossing the fish into a bucket to gasp and flop around, as I see many anglers doing here in the U.S.



's avatar #44222: PZ Myers — 10/17  at  01:35 PM
Ah, feeding animals is another problem. You can't use the anesthetic on them. It's also ironic that we're reluctant to commit cruelty to animals, but bears will rip a salmon apart while alive -- I once found a salmon twitching on a bank, bitten open and the tasty egg mass inside slurped out (and I didn't do anything to help it, either, but quickly walked away before the slurper noticed me). We feed snakes live rats.

Pain is a part of the world, we just try to minimize our personal contribution to it.

I don't know how to kill arthropods humanely. What about the usual insect killing jars, loaded with toluene/xylene fumes? How awful is that to an arthropod?

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#44236: tony g — 10/17  at  02:19 PM
i collect a substantial number of insects as vouchers. the quickest method i have used is standard practice with odonates. dropping into a vial of acetone -- it produces some momentary twitching, but within a couple of seconds they are dead. odonates are then soaked in the acetone for eight hours or so and then dried. other insects are removed and dried forthwith.

if you're using these spiders as voucher specimens, know that acetone does bleach some insects (notably beetles and grasshoppers) and might do the same to arachnids. entomologists not working with odes rarely use acetone. in those cases standard killing jars are the way to go.



#44243: Hank — 10/17  at  02:42 PM
Now this isn't for everyone, but I once had some largish tropical fish that I needed to kill. I thought that the freezer method seemed kind of cruel. The whacking on the table wasn't for me either. So I filled up an Dewer with liquid nitrogen and dropped the fish into it. They stopped wiggling pretty much instantaneously.



#44245: Bob Davis — 10/17  at  02:47 PM
We feed snakes live rats.

Besides turtles, we also used to have geckos, and we would feed them live pinky mice. Oh, man, that was horrible. The little buggers would squeek. So we wouldn't do it very often. Much easier to feed them crickets, which only make a lot of noise when they're not being eaten - a good reason to root for the geckos to catch them.

It's a wild world out there (and in here too.)



#44258: — 10/17  at  03:15 PM
I havnt seen anyone else mention it, but over here in the UK, the clubs you use for killing fish are commonly called "priests". Some are real works of art, carved out of antler with lead weight in the end, others are just a lump of rusty, heavy, iron.



#44266: — 10/17  at  03:52 PM
mccm, a recent meta-level study in JAMA said that the evidence points to fetal sentience arriving around week 29.

Interesting: if that's so, I was born and had major heart surgery while non-sentient! (This now leads to the question `what the hell is sentience anyway?' which is a quagmire. My episodic memory doesn't start until the usual sort of age, 3--4, but I'd not claim that a one- or two-year-old was non-sentient. Sentience can be lost, too, of course, through trauma or oxygen deprivation or career choice; witness Terri Schiavo or Rick Santorum.)

Sentient or not the surgery was still carried out under anaesthetic; capable of feeling pain or no, shock can kill premature babies very easily.



#44274: Evan Murdock — 10/17  at  04:36 PM
Some entomologists of my acquaintance have told me it's unlikely spiders (and other arthropods) have any self-awareness as we know it.


This strikes me as one of those "it's easier to believe and impossible to disprove" ideas; much like the whole do fish/babies feel pain question. Though I guess I might distinguish between "feel pain" and "have self awareness."

I've always assumed that all animals feel pain; there's no reason to think there'd be a hard line somewhere. After all, pain and pain avoidance are not high level brain functions; it seems only logical that any creature with a nervous system and some way to avoid pain (read motility) would have the ability to feel it. By this theory, yes, clams can feel pain.

The ASPCA should certainly take action against an unabashed fish torturer.

I am not a vegetarian; in fact I love the meat in its miriad forms; but that's no reason to be heartless about it when we have a choice.



#44278: Evan Murdock — 10/17  at  04:45 PM
My father (I think) tells a story of a coworker who was going to teach fishprinting to a group of schoolkids, so froze the fish to do 'em in (carp, maybe?). Anyway, legend has it that the fish thawed out during the printing, and were dinstinctly not dead, which was a shock to both teacher and students.

Just a word to the wise...



#44291: — 10/17  at  06:18 PM
PZ, I'm surprised at you. Your reasoning doesn't work:

"Of course they can feel pain, you clueless boob! Mind if I put this barbed hook through your lip?"* The fish cutaneous sensory network is intricate and exquisite, and they react vigorously to noxious stimuli.

Yes, a hook through my lip would hurt, fish do have cutaneous nociceptors, and they react to noxious stimuli. None of this is evidence that they experience pain. Nociception and pain aren't the same thing, and you don't have to feel pain to react to noxious stimuli. Under some forms of anaesthesia or nervous disorder, humans will react to pain without being conscious and report no experience of pain later.

I for one don't know for sure if fish feel pain but I find the argument made by James Rose fairly convincing: in brief, while they have a nice repertoire of reflexes and avoidance behaviors, they don't have the neural equipment to experience pain in anything like the way that we and other mammals do. Here's the reference:

Rose, JD (2002) The Neurobehavioral Nature of Fishes and the Question of Awareness and Pain. Reviews in Fisheries Science 10:1-38.

FWIW, I anaesthetize fish for cranial surgieres using buffered MS-222 and then plop the fish into a sponge that has a fish-shape cut out of it and has been moistened and frozen. Slows the metabolism down to keep the fish sleepy until I'm done. For euthanasia, the fish goes straight from the MS-222 to the freezer.



#44310: — 10/17  at  08:02 PM
Here's a random question for the fish people here (including our host):

I have inherited the job of caring for our office goldfish, who's quite an endearing little fellow (or lady -- hard to tell with goldfish).

I've read some places that it's stressful for them to fish them out with a net when you're transferring them from the dirty bowl to a clean one, but no one has ever said what the less stressful way of doing it actually is. The old method (before we discovered that someone had a fish net in another office on the same floor) of pouring most of the water out and then grabbing the fish with your bare hand probably wasn't very relaxing for the poor thing either.

So am I traumatizing my poor piscine friend every time I scoop him out with the net, or what?

(He was very upset with me today, but I wasn't able to surprise him like I usually do and had to chase him around the bowl to catch him. But a little extra food in the new bowl eventually won him over.)



#44311: — 10/17  at  08:06 PM
My father (I think) tells a story of a coworker who was going to teach fishprinting to a group of schoolkids, so froze the fish to do 'em in (carp, maybe?). Anyway, legend has it that the fish thawed out during the printing, and were dinstinctly not dead, which was a shock to both teacher and students.

If they were carp, that makes perfect sense to me, since they live in lakes that are frozen in the winter months. I wonder if they hibernate?



#44320: — 10/17  at  08:36 PM
They're fish. Why do you care if their death is messy, unless it's to save yourself the trouble of wiping up the lab bench?



#44329: — 10/17  at  09:37 PM
I'm not a fish biologist, so I don't know the biochemical details, but probably fish acclimate to near-freezing temperatures in winter lakes. This makes it harder to kill them by freezing. My family went ice-fishing one winter, and let the fish lie on the ice to freeze to death, as we assumed. When we got back to the cabin and put the fish in the sink to defrost so they could be cleaned, after a little while they revived and flopped around. I don't think you will have this problem if your fish are acclimated to warm water conditions.



#44334: — 10/17  at  09:56 PM
Fish are quite temperature sensitive, but not only do their metabolisms in general slow down, their neural activity does as well. In warm water fish placed in cold water, their brains kind of grind to a halt, and in cold water fish placed in warm water, intrinsic firing rates go way up. For this reason, I'm not as down on cold water anaesthesia as PZ is. It's true that the fish probably don't like it, but on the other hand, they don't have long to, uh, "think" about it.

Some species of carp are especially adapted not only for cold water but for low-oxygen conditions, such as when they're frozen under a lake for long periods and the water isn't being reoxygenated. So even when their metabolism is slowed down, their brains still work. These guys are not such great candidates for cold water anaesthesia, but on the other hand, they're an in vitro electrophysiologist's dream. Plop that brain in some artificial cerebrospinal fluid, and it just keeps on tickin'.



#44335: — 10/17  at  09:57 PM
Holy crap I am such a nerd.



#44356: — 10/18  at  04:47 AM
Canadian Fish and Wildlife frown strongly on releasing any fish dosed with TMS out into streams rivers or lakes.
Couldn't they be put into separate clean water to recover before being returned if the issue is one of contaminating the environment?



#44377: Keith Douglas — 10/18  at  08:04 AM
I don't have much intelligent to add. However, I did want to note that this thread is rather remarkable - I had no idea euthanizing fish was such a serious business.

What about that earthworm I did in my high school organismal biology class? (We did a series of dissections, as it happens, compared to only one in my college class, though that was only 1 semester long, too.)



#44468: — 10/18  at  12:48 PM
SEF wrote:

"Couldn't they be put into separate clean water to recover before being returned if the issue is one of contaminating the environment?"

There is some debate about how long/whether TMS is absorbed into the tissues of the fish. Since it is a nasty carcinogen, F & W would rather not run the risk of the fish becoming something or someone's lunch shortly after being released.



#45878: — 10/28  at  12:24 PM
How much ms222 should one use to euthasize a crab?



#47236: — 11/05  at  07:10 AM
Have you ever used this method to euthanize Anabantoidei? We've a large discussion going on how to humanely euthanize them, bettas in particular.

Any comments and/or suggestions greatly appreciated.

Much thanks,
Roan



#47521: — 11/07  at  04:19 PM
Hey
Now I'm not a scientist, or lab worker, im just average joe, but after reading most of the above no one actually has an answer, a solid one anyhow. I like fishing, and when i catch a fish, which i will take home to eat if it's big enough, because i like to eat fish! how else can u kill it apart from cutting it's throat or smashing it with a club?, and at the end of the day, dieing ain't gonna be a nice process, so lets just make it as quick as possible don't u think.
Other question, If i caught a large fish, its not like I can let it swim round in the sleepy solution and if i did could you still eat it afterwards?
Most fishermen put them on ice, keeping them fresh, but is that crueler than cuting a throat or wacking them on the head.
Anyone with a solid answer.....
All questions aside, I always feel guilty after killing a living thing, but hey fish(the good ones)taste good!



#48399: — 11/11  at  12:21 PM
Erica said " They're fish. Why do you care if their death is messy, unless it's to save yourself the trouble of wiping up the lab bench?"

What a horrible attitude you have. If the fish in question is your pet then you should care very much about the quality of their death. Fish are not just stupid, non feeling creatures. They have personalities and can be friendly and quite endearing. I would want my pet fish to suffer as little as possible.



Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Next entry: Nice table

Previous entry: Carnival of the Godless #25

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college