It's tempting to just give them all 'C's and be done with it
Today is the day grades for fall term are due. I've finished off most of the big stack, but the last term papers and lab reports are always the hardest. It is only appropriate that on this day of grueling grading I recommend that you read the Carnival of Education, and since I will be a shambling wreck by the time I'm done putting all this together, Grand Rounds.
Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/3640/7QVN31OH/


Hey, PZ--Your name's in a Scientific American blog again, and linked with Richard Dawkins. Pretty rarified company, if you ask me. He's a knight.
http://blog.sciam.com/index.php?title=the_flying_spaghetti_monster_and_i&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
"Just to further clarify, I'm absolutely not arguing for a strategic moratorium on anti-religious arguments. Some critics have suggested that outspokenly atheistic evolution advocates such as Richard Dawkins and PZ Myers should censor themselves for the greater good. I disagree: the scientific community encompasses many points of view and there is no reason to hide that fact. At the same time, let's not play into the hands of the creationists by unintentionally sending the message that science is automatically derisive of religion."
For what it's worth, I think she's mistaken. Science really does erode, if not deride, religion. Reason strangles faith.