Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Sunday, October 09, 2005

National PornSunday, with fornicating fish

If you didn't already know, Pharyngula does try to promote a healthy, sex-positive image of carnal activity, with the occasional explicit description of animals going at it. Here are few examples if you want to celebrate PornSunday with some real variety.


Lobster sex
Worm porn!
Octopus sex
Tentacle sex
How to evolve a vulva
Fish courtship and sex
Spider Kama Sutra
Penis evolution
Sex in the MRI

Remember, though, that just because spiders and squid do it their way, you don't have to. And you probably can't, anyway.

In case you hadn't noticed, it's National PornSunday! It's a strange event promoted by a couple of Christian ministers who seem to be disturbed by the "secret shame" of Christians who look at pornography, and are making a big noise about it. (I rather cynically suspect that they've discovered that sermons about pornography are a great way to pack the pews.) They cite some statistics that I presume are supposed to be shocking:

  • Number of pornographic web sites: 4.2 Million
  • People who regularly visit Internet porn web sites daily: 40 million
  • Christians who said pornography is a major problem in the home: 47%
  • Breakdown of male/female visitors to pornography sites: 65% male - 35% female
  • 30% of unsolicited e-mails contain pornographic materials
  • Women, far more than men, are likely to act out their behaviors in real life, such as having multiple partners, casual sex, or affairs.
  • Porn revenue is larger than the combined revenues of all professional football, baseball and basketball franchises.
  • US porn revenue exceeds the combined revenues of ABC, CBS, and NBC at $6.2 billion.

I can't vouch for those statistics, and they don't give their sources. There are some interesting contradictions there: if 47% of Christians claim pornography is a "major problem", doesn't that suggest that the figure of 40 million daily porn viewers is an underestimate? It's also not clear exactly what they propose to do about it, and they are simply implicitly assuming that there is a problem here.

If we assume their numbers are somewhat accurate, though, what is that problem? What they tell us is that people like sex. This is not a surprise. We're fascinated by sex, we're curious about our bodies, and we also have curious monkey-minds that are attracted to the forbidden. When I see that pornography is such a huge industry, and given that it doesn't and shouldn't harm the viewer, I think the proper response is to embrace it, not tell people they should shun it or feel guilty or take action to shut it down. Why not be open about it, and work to alleviate genuine problems within the industry, like the exploitation of women, its potential as vehicle for sexual harassment, and the psychological problems of viewers who are obsessive about it?

Personally, I don't find pornography that stimulating, and am not particularly interested in promoting it…but I do think it would be good for society if we did have a healthier, less guilt-filled attitude towards perfectly normal physical functions. For one thing, more open-mindedness about sex and reproduction might make pathological stories of parental abuse of their teenagers rarer. Instead of a day where we try to make people feel wrong about their normal interest in sex, I think we should make this a day where we feel good about it—a National HealthySexDay!

In the spirit of subverting PornSunday, here is a QuickTime movie of copulating zebrafish (730K), made by a couple of students in my lab, Matt Enke and Jason Ward. It's very short—only about 2 seconds long—but that's because I've cut out all the foreplay. The fish spend around 20 minutes nuzzling and chasing each other, and engaging in various displays that I'm sure the fish find very stimulating, but are rather cryptic to my mammalian eyes.

You may find everything about fish behavior utterly cryptic, so here are a few annotated frames from the short movie to help you puzzle out what's going on. Download the movie and follow along! Single-stepping through the frames will make it easier—otherwise, it's going to look like the fastest boink you've ever seen, and if you blink you'll miss all the fun.

copulating zebrafish
The mating male and female start out swimming closely with one another, rising up towards the middle of the tank.
copulating zebrafish
The loving pair swim in a tight pas de deux.
copulating zebrafish
Suddenly, the two twist and swing their pelvic fins together. Notice the third fish following along attentively.
copulating zebrafish
Money shot! The little arrows point to a few of the cloud of eggs that suddenly spurt out; the male also ejaculates simultaneously. The third fish's attentions turn to the eggs.
copulating zebrafish
The female has jetted away quickly, while the male follows. Note the kinky, hungry female pointed to by the red arrow; she has risen up into the cloud of eggs and sperm and is about to suck one down.

Wasn't that beautiful and fun? I suspect my fish are also happier and better adjusted than any gang of repressed Puritans you can find.

If you'd like to see this sort of thing going on in your house, I'll mention that healthy, well-fed zebrafish, Danio rerio, are routinely frisky. Their sexual behavior is on a circadian rhythm, and they respond to dawn's light with regular orgies, every day. It's easy to stimulate—get up early and turn the light on in your aquarium—and it's easy to spot, with very excited fish darting about and tangling up in wild slippery balls of roiling sexual activity.

It's also a good marker. When my fish stop having sex every day, I know that they are feeling stressed or ill or exhausted or aren't getting their proper nutrition. And when I see people afflicted with repressive Christianity that turns sex into a shameful activity, I can't help but make the comparison with a disease.

(crossposted to The American Street)

Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/3097/nu1UnmL1/

Comments:
#43289: Alon Levy — 10/10  at  07:10 AM
Elsewhere we find that 40% of children are born out of wedlock in England.

In Sweden this figure is more than 50%, if I remember correctly. It's not because there are a lot of single parents, but because a lot of couples just don't marry.



#43291: — 10/10  at  07:25 AM
"If women are far more likely than men to have multiple partners, casual sex, and extramarital affairs..."

And yet males form 65% of visitors to porn sites...

I've read somewhere that a larger percentage of women are having sex with a smaller percentage of men, leaving most guys with a smaller number of women. In most polygynist species (remember, in ancient times polygyny was common among humans), a smaller number of males have access to a larger number of females, leaving most males with less females to sate their desires.



#43292: Geoffrey Brent — 10/10  at  07:26 AM
'Open-mindedness' equates to the 'sexual freedom' (sic) discussed above in about the same way that the study of ballistics and medicine equates to drive-by shootings.

So, who *are* 'those intellectuals who see in this conduct nothing but an extension of human freedom and choice, another thread in life's rich tapestry'? While people disagree greatly about the causes and proper remedies for such behaviour, I'm having trouble thinking of any intellectuals who would see this story as anything other than deplorable. I smell straw, which is a pity, because up to that point he's making a lot of sense.



#43320: Redshift — 10/10  at  09:54 AM
There are some interesting contradictions there: if 47% of Christians claim pornography is a "major problem", doesn't that suggest that the figure of 40 million daily porn viewers is an underestimate?

Not if you remember that it takes much less than "daily viewing" for Christians to consider it a "major problem." (Honestly, I'd bet that even if there was only one daily viewer, a large percentage of Christians could be convinced that it is a "major problem.")



#43323: — 10/10  at  09:56 AM
Well, 40 million may visit pr0n sites daily, but, if 47% of Christians think it's a big problem, maybe they difference visit them weekly or something. I occassionally indulge in visiting such websites, but it might be more a twice-a-week thing than a once-a-day thing. If I were a conservative Christian type, I might consider that a problem while still not being among the 40 million daily visitors.

I have to say, the XXXChurch site is pretty well done. I also think that some liberals (e.g., Amanda, whose post directed me here) get a little bit carried away in their enthusiasm for pr0n. I mean, much of it is fine, high-quality entertainment, but I don't think the industry needs unpaid promoters (it sorta reminds me of when McDonalds or something makes use of unpaid conservative activists to promote their products because the activists think something like, "well, those Supersize Me-watching liberals don't like it, so I MUST promote it!"



#43358: — 10/10  at  11:41 AM
a mother who turns her own 14-year-old child out of doors because her latest boyfriend does not want him or her in the house

Which intellectuals ... see in this conduct nothing but an extension of human freedom and choice, another thread in life's rich tapestry?

I think most people, intellectual or not, would see this as serious psychopathology.



#43417: — 10/10  at  05:05 PM
With the recently released photos of the giant squid, the titilating details of squid sex have been making the rounds. The latest article is "Love is a battlefield for the giant squid", which ties the subject into the Right's reaction to the March of the Penguins movie.

Here's the money quote:


[Squid (s)expert] O'Shea says he's working with the Discovery Channel to make a documentary about the lives of squid - one unlikely perhaps to be embraced by the religious right the way March of the Penguins has been.

Yet in their way, the giant squid uphold admirable family values, since they risk life and limb to spawn the next generation. Of course, just as penguins have been caught in gay unions, so some male squid have washed up with sperm injected into their arms. "Homosexuality is rife among cephalopods," O'Shea says.

But these squid probably aren't really gay. They don't have the luxury of expressing a sexual preference. They're just horny, he says. "And it's really dark down there."



#43457: T — 10/11  at  12:33 AM
Man, I think you've totally missed the boat. This ministry is all about helping those who are addicted. They're not out to tell everyone that they are wrong and should feel guilty. Another point is that, you mention we should not shun our feelings of sex and our body... but we should not use porn to exploit that. We should not go to something or someone else besides our wife. It's unhealthy. It breaks the relationship. The point of this particular ministry is to simply get the word out, they let the church and other ministries worry about follow up and have relationships with other ministries that do that, like http://www.pureonline.com. They aren't out to force a guilt trip on someone, just be available to help those who are addicted and know they need help.



#43458: Alon Levy — 10/11  at  12:44 AM
We should not go to something or someone else besides our wife. It's unhealthy. It breaks the relationship.

Says who?



#46064: — 10/30  at  02:56 AM
I would assume the 47% "major problem" stat and the 40 million daily views have a simple explanation that harmonizes them...


... the "major problem" consists not only of web porn, but of non-web porn.

Like, oh, Playboy, or videos or ...



Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Next entry: PZ needs!

Previous entry: Juan Cole on evolvetv.tv again

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college