Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Saturday, June 18, 2005

Planet of the Hats

I know you will not believe me, but I swear it's true: I'm not of this earth. I fled here years ago because my home planet was driving me crazy. Let me explain.

My home world is very much like this one. It's populated by billions of bipedal primates, who are just like people here: sometimes foolish, sometimes wise, sometimes hateful, sometimes generous. They are grouped into cities and nations, and sometimes they have wars, and sometimes they cooperate. You really would have a hard time telling our two planets apart, except for one thing.

The hats.

My people are obsessed with hats. Almost everyone wears them, and a lot of their identity is wrapped up in their particular style. Some people always wear cowboy hats, for instance, and others wear bowlers, and each think the other is exceedingly funny-looking, and would never consider switching. They have elaborate ceremonies for their children in which they confer the hats, and kids often go to special schools once a week where they learn about the history and significance of their hats. Everyone has the importance of hats drilled into them from birth to death.

The particular type of hat was critical. Individuals only rarely changed hat styles, and when they did, it was considered grounds for sorrow by those who wore the abandoned style, and cause for rejoicing by those wearing the newly adopted style. Sometimes people would invent new kinds of hats, which were typically regarded as bizarre when one person was wearing it, but once a sufficient number switched to the new style, they were respected automatically. It meant that streets of our more cosmopolitan cities were filled with strange and comical hats bobbing along, but no one laughed. Laughing at a hat was considered a heinous crime.

It sounds very silly, I know. A minority on my planet also find it pointless, myself among them, and didn't bother with wearing a hat. This is tolerated in the more civilized nations, although there are places where wearing no hat, or a strange hat, can get you killed. And honestly, many people in my country only bothered to wear their hat once a week, although the rest of the time they would keep them on ornate hatstands in their home, and attached much significance to their presence.

Now why should mere excesses of fashion compel someone to flee many light years to escape? There was something more. There was a near-universal notion of remarkable absurdity: most people believed that an important portion of their minds actually resided in their hats. The locus of their ethical sense was not believed to be in their brains, but somehow intertwined in the fabric of their hats. This led to strange customs: witnesses in trials were required to wear their hats to give testimony; soldiers were thought to be cowards without their hats; politicians vied to see who could wear the most ostentatious versions of their hats; sex was considered a filthy practice because people would take off their hats to do it. There was no scientific evidence for any of this, and the evidence actually contradicted the belief, but since it was hallowed by tradition, it persisted.

Hatters, milliners, and haberdashers were highly regarded professionals, and every town would have numerous hatshops. Their numbers proliferated, because obviously you could not have the person who crafted miters also making berets, or vice versa, but still they prospered because, not only were the majority sinking a significant proportion of their income into the purchase and care of their hats, but the occupation was considered too dignified to be taxed. Huge sums of money were poured into hatteries, and the people considered this to be a virtuous act that made them more noble and right. The president of my country listened very closely to his council of hatters, and no television punditry was complete without a haberdasher to use his vast hat-based wisdom to pontificate on domestic and foreign policy. They were all talking out of their hats, which was considered a very good thing.

I couldn't help noticing, though, that the very idea that ethical thought was localized to a hat was a ridiculous notion, and that hatless people could be just as good and kind and wise as those with the most ornate hat (and that hatless people could also be wretched and cruel, of course, as could the hatted.) Our president had a rhinestone-covered 20 gallon cowboy hat with an airhorn and flashing strobe, and he seemed far less virtuous than my neighbor, with her simple and unostentatious cap. Hats obviously had nothing to do with morality, except perhaps in an inverse way: those who spent the most effort polishing the geegaws and flash on their hats usually put the least effort into honing their minds.

I could see the writing on the wall. Being hatless myself meant my chances for promotion were limited, but even more worrisome was that the height of one's hat was becoming the sole measure of nobility of purpose, and the genuine leaders were being replaced with loud poseurs who knew how to stretch a crown and use a Be-Dazzler. When the People of the Easter Bonnet started encouraging war with the Chador Wearers, citing deep philosophical differences, I bundled my family into our rocketship and flew away.

We stayed briefly at the Planet of Shoes, but found the same problems there, so now we've settled here on Earth where, clearly, the situation is completely different.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/2443/93Q6nZ7k/

Comments:
#28991: coturnix — 06/18  at  08:24 PM
But what if making hats makes you sick? Mercury used in the production of hats used to make old hatters quite crazy, hence the "Mad Hatter" character from Alice. Is this a matter of trade-off? You keep your hair dry, but your brain turns to mush.



#28996: craig — 06/18  at  10:47 PM
I tried to think of a head shop joke but failed.



#28997: Siavash — 06/18  at  10:50 PM
amazing, deep and yet catching



#28999: — 06/18  at  11:18 PM
A hat, insists a commenter above, can be a good thing. A hat can be a comfort on a chilly day, or a soothing familiarity much like a stuffed toy or clutch blanket.

So why do so many of the hats I notice seem so tight as to cut off all blood to the head, or so loose as to completely obscure the vision of the wearer?

Could it be that in this modern day the hats' pressings are still fixed with Hg in the medieval way, and the offgassing has addled the once-sensible wearers?

Or is it merely in fashion these days to look as if one just doesn't care that one's hat marks one immediately as completely unconcerned with the value of rational thought? (I have noticed quite a few hat aficionados who seem even to glory in projecting this impression, sporting ridiculous clownish hats that are so unwieldy they present a hazard to their small children.)

No, I'm convinced it's that many Americans insist on wearing hats that are simply poor copies of hundred- or even thousand-year-old hats, for no other reason than their parents or friends wear similar hats. Or because they care more about what people will think, than the need to think, and it's important to them to display their team colors. Or even because they are simply too lazy to think much about where their hat came from, and where it has been, and this just happens to be the hat they have laying around, smelly and dysfunctional as it is.

I humbly propose that the discriminating defender of hattery design her own style of hat personally (preferably taking the old one off first). Might I suggest a completely new kind of hat, original, modern, lightweight, yet functional -- one which is compatible with both walking and thinking, leaving the eyes clear and the brain with access to oxygen. I haven't seen many hats such as this in our country, but I'm convinced it would be a good thing for the world if the US took the lead on R&D in this area.

Let's please agree to see if the free market can handle the job unassisted though. President Bush's incessant harping on the need for subsidies for his friends and contributors in the hat industry already make me quite uncomfortable.



#29002: — 06/19  at  02:22 AM
Mandatory Monty Python trivialization:

I've had a team working on this over the past few weeks, and, uh, what we've come up with can be reduced to two fundamental concepts. One: people are not wearing enough hats. Two: matter is energy. In the universe, there are many energy fields which we cannot normally perceive. Some energies have a spiritual source which act upon a person's soul. However, this soul does not exist ab initio, as orthodox Christianity teaches. It has to be brought into existence by a process of guided self-observation. However, this is rarely achieved, owing to man's unique ability to be distracted from spiritual matters by everyday trivia.


From The Meaning of Life



#29003: — 06/19  at  06:20 AM
Didn't Swift do something very similar to this based on which end of the boiled egg was broken first at breakfast?



#29004: Mrs Tilton — 06/19  at  06:57 AM
I have never been in the least bothered by your atheism, PZ, but I do wish you had had the decency to disclose your ahatheism from the start. The question which god or gods, if any, to believe in is a purely private affair. Hats, by contrast, are a different matter altogether. In the bleak light of your hatlessness, Pharyngula takes on a very sinister aspect indeed.



#29005: Mrs Tilton — 06/19  at  07:01 AM
No, hang on a minute -- I am sure I have seen a picture of you in a pirate's hat. As is well known, there are no ahatheists on quarter-decks.

Was this a version of Pascal's Wager, I wonder? 'If I do not wear the pirate's hat, the worst that can happen is that my hair will be wind-swept. If I do wear it, on the other hand, I shall be entitled to dance about on any treasure chests I find, and say "Arrrr!"'



's avatar #29006: PZ Myers — 06/19  at  07:07 AM
Once upon a time, I did wear a hat. It was a worn denim cap with a leather brim and an American flag stitched on top -- very butch. But one day about 20 years ago, I wore it to a lecture by Harlan Ellison, and when I left, I forgot it on the seat next to me. When I noticed, I rushed back to the auditorium, but I was too late. It was gone. I have been hatless ever since.

I blame Harlan.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#29007: — 06/19  at  07:14 AM
The hat thing also "explains" why other animals aren't considered to have morals/souls - and why it's so outrageous to put chimps in bowlers for tea adverts. It does raise the issue of whether head lice get a special dispensation into heaven though ...

... and what about Paddington's marmalade sandwich.

PS Donkeys traditionally wear hats.



Trackback: A Pair of P's Tracked on: The Politburo Diktat (216.193.202.220) at 2005 06 19 07:53:56
Patterico passes on the proferred purple punch of a potential Presidential primary participant. Pharyngula purports a parallel "Planet of the Hats," populated by pre-occupied bi-pedal primates. (I have participated in plenty of pissing contests with this pair, but am pleased to postulate that "I am the Commissar, and I approve these posts.")...



#29017: — 06/19  at  10:42 AM
Re: Hats as protection

On PZ's planet, there was neither rain nor blazing sun. Rather, a thick ozone layer provided protection from the sun and a nightly dew watered the earth. As such, folks like PZ felt no need to wear hats for protection against nonexistent threats. But they still realized that the hat-wearers, who believed in the mythical threats of sun and rain, found comfort in the protection of a hat. Likewise, folks like PZ recognized that artistry and beauty could be shown forth in creative hat designs, much as the 23rd Psalm or the Sistine Chapel are recognized as art today.



Trackback: Escape from the Planet of the Hats. Tracked on: Stupid Evil Bastard (63.247.143.6) at 2005 06 19 11:13:09
PZ Myers has an excellent bit of creative writing up titled Planet of the Hats that does an excellent job of illustrating religious beliefs. I know you will not believe me, but I swear it's true: I'm not of this earth. I fled here years ago because my home planet was driving me crazy. Let me explain. My home world is very much like this one. It's populated by billions of bipedal primates, who are just like people here: sometimes foolish, sometimes wise, sometimes hateful, sometimes……



Trackback: President Bush and Heritage Foundation Say ... Tracked on: The Corpus Callosum (72.9.234.70) at 2005 06 19 12:13:09
How the Abstinence-Only Controversy Shows that Scientists are Morally Proper: I am aware of the fact that this is the kind of reasoning that got Socrates killed. I'll probably get a UPS delivery of hemlock tomorrow morning...



#29038: Ophelia Benson — 06/19  at  02:20 PM
You must miss the poor dear Archbishop of Haberdashery though. And that nice fella in the Hatican who tells people not to wear hats on any part of their anatomy except their heads even though penis hats can prevent the transmission of a fatal disease that is ravaging entire sections of the Hat planet - what a lovely man he is to be sure. And those kind hat-brushers who torture children and nuns to death in the belief that they are 'possessed' by The Bald One.

It's hard to imagine why you didn't like it there.



#29057: — 06/19  at  08:22 PM
Pfft, I bet you are one of those crazy unpatriotic loonies trying to keep hats out of courts and classrooms, despite the founding fathers clearly all favouring a good stiff top hat or sturdy, sombre fez on every judge and teacher.

Very apt and amusing. Made me think of Back of the Bible.

-Schmitt.



#29058: decrepitoldfool — 06/19  at  08:29 PM
This would have made a good classic Trek episode. The crew encounters the Hat Planet and, after getting mixed up in planetary hat politics in total violation of the prime directive, withdraws to orbit to watch in dismay as different hat factions destroy one another.

"Sigh... warp factor one, Mr. Sulu. Let's get out of here."



#29063: — 06/19  at  10:37 PM
Swift would indeed be proud. Well done.



#29441: — 06/22  at  07:56 PM
My hat is off to you, PZ. (not for long, though) What about the National Anthem, the Pledge, the entry of the Queen, etc., can there be anything more sacred than wearing a hat? And what of those undergoing chemo who are in such pain they can't wear a hat, and now can't even have a toke? Oh, the depth of depravity of those godless hatless creatures!



Trackback: Sixteenth Carnival of the Godless Tracked on: Positive Liberty (72.9.234.70) at 2005 06 25 21:24:55
Welcome to all atheists, skeptics, agnostics, infidels, and doubters of various sorts. I am your host, Jason Kuznicki, and this is the Sixteenth Carnival of the Godless.



#29946: Guy — 06/27  at  05:51 AM
Don't forget about the scandals when some of the milliners were found to be fondling the beanies and ball caps of the younger hat-wearers...



Page 2 of 2 pages  <  1 2

Next entry: …but plums suddenly seem so gay

Previous entry: Web death imminent

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college