Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Saturday, September 03, 2005

Republican failure, Republican blame

I agree in part with Mike Dunford, who thinks there is plenty of blame to go around. It's true that the catastrophe in New Orleans is due to many factors—uncontrollable ones, like the probability of a large hurricane striking the city; passive ones, like Democrats and scientists not fighting stupidity hard enough; active ones, like the dedicated work of Republicans to gut government effectiveness. In a sense, yes, we can say that the disaster is the fault of all Americans.

Unfortunately, that attitude also encourages a kind of passivity, and also enables politicians who say things like this:

"I hope people don't play politics during this period of time," Mr. Bush told Diane Sawyer of ABC's "Good Morning America" in the Roosevelt Room of the White House. "This is a natural disaster, the likes of which our country may have never seen before."

Wrong. This is the time to play politics. We are supposed to be a democracy, and that requires the active engagement of the citizenry in assessing matters of policy. It is our responsibility to listen and observe the decisions of our leaders, and toss out the rascals who do badly and promote the ones who do well. It is exactly in these situations of crisis where policies are tested and we are in the best position to judge. And contrary to Mike, while we clearly have failures at all levels of the process, this is the time where it is our job to stand up and point to specific points of error. It is also obvious that there is one huge, dominant factor that has been operating over decades to culminate now, in this problem and many others: the Republican party. The party of know-nothings, incompetence, greed, bigotry, religious intolerance, and irresponsibility. We now have the government they wanted, and that we allowed them to have.

Robert Farley summarizes our situation. That Bush quote above is a perfect example of the denial of responsibility going on here.

The Republicans have managed a nifty trick over the last twenty-five years. They have worked ceaselessly to make government less effective, while at the same time deriving political benefit from inadequate government. The Republican attack on good governance involves the cutting of necessary funding, the wholesale transfer of critical government capabilities to the private sector, the stocking of government agencies with inept, corrupt, and obstructionist appointees, and the sellout of regulatory agencies to the industries they're supposed to observe.

In a fair world, all of this would result in the Republican party taking some degree of blame for bad governance. In this world, the exact opposite seems to happen. Government fails by design. Government failure feeds into an anti-statist narrative that allows the Republicans to further slash funding, to further gut federal agencies, and to further cripple the capacity of the government to do anything useful.

So where are we at now? Paul Krugman knows.

So America, once famous for its can-do attitude, now has a can't-do government that makes excuses instead of doing its job. And while it makes those excuses, Americans are dying.

Molly Ivins knows.

In fact, there is now a governmentwide movement away from basing policy on science, expertise and professionalism, and in favor of choices based on ideology. If you're wondering what the ideological position on flood management might be, look at the pictures of New Orleans—it seems to consist of gutting the programs that do anything.

We have to wake up. Mike is right to blame scientists and Democrats and all American citizens for allowing this leadership disaster to happen, but we have to look to the source of the decisions that led us to this place. We have to recognize what the goals of the Republican party are.

The Republican agenda is to turn the United States into a third-world shithole.

Not by explicit intent, of course, but by neglect, the promotion of incompetence, and short-sightedness. By treating government as a kleptocracy. By governing badly. By pandering to the stupid, by advocating superstition (let's pray and send bibles to New Orleans!), by poisoning our educational system with nonsense, by haring off on destructive wars that enrich corporate cronies, by belittling expertise and favoring ideology, by ignoring freaking reality.

We're at one of those critical points in history. We can either destroy the Republican party by kicking every one of the bastards out of office*, or we can watch them destroy our country. This is the time for partisanship. I pick the side of America.


*Now, if only there were an actual opposition party to make this effort easier…


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/2851/8YWNJKq7/

Comments:
#38629: — 09/03  at  05:03 PM
I sense such hostility here. Look, Baseyian, I can use blockquotes!



's avatar #38630: Ken Cope — 09/03  at  05:25 PM
Assessing the consequences and causes of catastrophic failure is the responsibility of those who participate in a democracy-- at least that's how anybody with reading comprehension would parse PZ's post.

By Nature Boy's reckoning, when Richard Feynman dropped an O-ring into a glass of ice water he was whining and blaming Republicans.



's avatar #38631: — 09/03  at  05:26 PM
People are stuck in their houses and the first thing that should have been done is staffed FEMA with democrats. OK.


Good. So you agree there are no competent republicans.

...mostly harmless.[color=blue]



#38632: coturnix — 09/03  at  05:33 PM
How the Free Market Killed New Orleans.

(I have collected a lot of good blog posts about Katrina here)



#38633: — 09/03  at  05:45 PM
The lack of response from FEMA and other Federal Government agencies should give pause to all of us in the United States. We have spent bucketfuls of money since 2001 for response to a terrorist attack - and the government can't even help evacuate a major city, one that is not at all the largest metropolitan area in the country, in a timely fashion. What if this had been a biological attack or dirty bomb? What does this say about the effectiveness of the Federal Government to respond? My opinion is that the money spent so far is just a way to take from the public sector and put into the private sector, regardless of what we receive for the money spent.



#38634: — 09/03  at  05:47 PM
Ken, I'm just asking for a fair assessment of the causes of the catastrophic failure in New Orleans. I just don't think it's helpful to place all the blame on one political party. The government is made up of both parties. No, I don't think that republicans can do no wrong. It would seem more balanced to follow Mike Dunfords lead. What does that reference to Richard Feynman mean? Is it an analogy? Is the O-ring New Orleans and the glass of Ice water the flooding?



#38635: ekzept — 09/03  at  05:53 PM
To "Me", regarding:
What would you have done differently? Let's hear that. It would be a lot more interesting then just whining.
won't need to let PZ answer that. people like me have been saying there has been a huge disconnect between reality as documented by science and how the government has been behaving for years. you want to know what should have been done starting in 1985?

first, this government -- and perhaps all governments based upon democracy -- need to learn how to do long term planning. there is no incentive in the political system we call the Constitution and its various state copies for doing that. that's because, if the purpose of politicians is to get elected, why do they have an incentive to take on a project whose benefits are 15 years away, and even then tenuous and statistical? the United States cannot survive the future on many fronts if such a long term perspective is not incorporated. the private sector does it because they have to pay insurance premiums, and these reflect the cost of future risks.

second, recognize that global warming is real. a part of it is natural and inevitable, but it is made much worse by anthropogenic warming. at this point, there is no reversing it, simply shortening the time it will seriously affect the planet. it's too late for reversal.

third, afford the building of infrastructure and adapting the United States to the consequences of global warming, including storms, higher sea level rises, disruptions of agriculture, and changes to our overseas markets, make that a higher priority than national defense, which presently consumes a large portion of the budget. if it is necessary to reduce defense to do that, then we must, because this defense is direct homeland defense, and you cannot "take it to the enemy" to protect yourself.

four, reengage in a rich and powerful program of investment in scientific research in all the fundamental sciences, the physical ones and biology using federal funds.

five, reinstitute the priority in science and maths education done after the time of Sputnik, using federal funds.

you wanted a program and plan? there it is.



#38636: ekzept — 09/03  at  05:58 PM
oh, and if you think i'm saying that the Constitution is messed up, i am.



#38638: ekzept — 09/03  at  06:06 PM
natural diasasters have no moral significance

as nature itself lacks, many here would agree. this is from a nice article by Harvard Professor of History Niall Ferguson at the UK Telegraph.



#38639: — 09/03  at  06:07 PM
My opinion is that the money spent so far is just a way to take from the public sector and put into the private sector, regardless of what we receive for the money spent.


That's an interesting opinion. I've never heard that before. I've always thought that public sectors money comes from the private sector. We must always expect that when someone else spends our money, we are not going receive full value. Isn't that right?



#38640: — 09/03  at  06:21 PM
you wanted a program and plan? there it is.


Yea, that's what I wanted. It looks well thought out. I agree that it's going to be hard to implement in a democracy. First one person is elected, then another with different priorities. And different friends, we can't forget that.



#38642: coturnix — 09/03  at  06:34 PM
The difference between slow and bloated bureacracy of the government and the slow and bloated bureacracy of big business is that big business has an added incentive to give the leats amount of least-quality of servie for the greatest amount of money.



#38643: ekzept — 09/03  at  06:51 PM
I agree that it's going to be hard to implement in a democracy. First one person is elected, then another with different priorities. And different friends, we can't forget that.
so you are saying democracies aren't up to doing what we agree is necessary? that's a true condemnation of a democracy. not even i am willing to do that. so you are anti-democratic. that's a long way from being a supporter of the Republican party.

i think we need to figure out some way of working long term planning into our government and our private sector. alas, people have a tendency to call that socialism, even if it isn't. i think we just need to be true to economics and capitalism. what Bush does is not capitalism. he does not allow the market to judge. he just drops barriers and taxes for corporate friends and cronies, and throws funds at them by pursuing policies where they can get rich. like Halburton. like the oil and gas folks. in any case, capitalism by itself is not enough to deal with this planning crisis.

and i'm no slam-dunk Democrat. look at the Democratic loonies opposing the Cape Wind project. but i am very, very far from being a Republican as it is defined today. i am sure it isn't a new sentiment, but politics is trashing the United States. maybe that is our fate. if it is, it's sure not something i can do anything about. and, y'know what? if global warming trashes this country, we've noone but ourselves to blame.



#38644: — 09/03  at  07:11 PM
so you are saying democracies aren't up to doing what we agree is necessary? that's a true condemnation of a democracy. not even i am willing to do that. so you are anti-democratic. That’s a long way from being a supporter of the Republican party.

I said it would be hard to implement in a democracy. I was referring to:
first, this government -- and perhaps all governments based upon democracy -- need to learn how to do long term planning.

I never said I was a Republican supporter, just that I didn't like all the whining.



#38645: ekzept — 09/03  at  07:14 PM
define specifically "whining". give examples.



#38647: ekzept — 09/03  at  07:48 PM
the Science Friday program from this past Friday is really good, and essential for understanding this problem. part 1 MP3, and part 2 MP3.



#38648: ekzept — 09/03  at  07:54 PM
interesting, a knowledgeable caller on the Science Friday show claims you cannot take public officials from either party to take infrastructure improvement to protect against natural disasters seriously. they view reports that this might happen as alarmist.

that's what i mean by the Constitution being broken.



#38649: ekzept — 09/03  at  08:02 PM
there's an awful lot of good stuff in this Science Friday show, including observations on the political system, and how, in addition to the pain and misery of the poor in New Orleans, business and the private sector took a tremendous hit.

the question is, what are the American people willing to give up in order to pay for flood protection, for protection against natural disasters?



#38650: ekzept — 09/03  at  08:13 PM
incidently, Harry Eagar, one of Ira Flatow's guests mentioned that in the 18th century, law in New Orleans was that each farmer was supposed to build his own dikes and levees on the seaward boundary of his property. (Lake Pontchatrain was not considered a factor in those days.) this created the compartments Harry was arguing for.

also, to inform that discussion a bit, the major problem is that because NO is built on marshland, the levees and floodwalls sink over time, diminishing their effectiveness.



#38652: Llelldorin — 09/03  at  09:13 PM
Actually, here's a much shorter term plan that would have made sense starting about Saturday, when it was known that this was going to be a Category 5:

(1) Build up supply depot in East Texas. (It doesn't take incredible foresight to realize that folks will need food, water, clothing, and medical supplies after a hurricane. You don't even need to have anticipated a massive hurricane--you'd need the same supplies for an earthquake, a terrorist strike, or nearly any other massive disaster.)

(2) Move army and marine helicopter assets to airfields in East Texas, well clear of the projected storm track.

(3) Just after the hurricane, launch AWACS to serve as airborne control towers over the stricken area.

(4) Just after the hurricane, land FEMA employees at the Superdome, as soon as it was clear that local officials had entirely lost control of the situation there. Supply them with satellite phones or battlefield communications gear so that they can keep the refugees aware of current plans.

(5) Begin airlifts of supplies to the Superdome, as soon as it was clear that local officials had disastrously underplanned there.

(6) Repeat (4) and (5) for the Convention Center, as news reports made it clear that there was a problem there as well.

(7) Have the President break off previous engagements and return to Washington no later than Tuesday, when the full scale of the disaster was clear. Have him give the nearly formulaic "our prayers are with the folks in the stricken area" speach, then focus on disentangling the chains of command so that the rescue workers weren't working at cross purposes.

You can't tell me that that would have been too much for a democracy to handle. You can't tell me that disaster relief isn't possible if the interstate highway system is damaged--we do have aircraft as well.



#38653: Jim Harrison — 09/03  at  09:27 PM
The ritual of blaming everybody evenhandedly for every failure of government doesn't cut it in an era when one party controls pretty much everything, especially since the Republicans are proving themselves to be more a criminal enterprise than a political movement. I'm not aware of any ideology right or left that justifies the kind of massive corruption, subversion of justice, international lawlessness, and progamatic sadism of this bunch. Bush no longer has supporters; they're accomplices.



#38654: ekzept — 09/03  at  09:40 PM
yes, Llelldorin, that would have been a much better plan. the military is wedded to their "Air-Land Battle 2000" concept which involves projecting all kinds of forces by air, so that would have been a far more sensible way of dealing with the problem than what was done.

the only disconnect i see is relying upon NGOs like the Red Cross so much, then not providing a means of getting them in to help, securely and such.

on another matter, i wish the consensus we see around here could be realized nationally. party discipline and the two-party hegemony on politics being what it is, it is really hard to break out even with intelligent, inspired leadership.

meanwhile, i've been spending time this weekend trying to catch up on the international reaction to all this. i am limited to primarily English language texts (well, some German and Norwegian), but overwhelmingly the reaction in the press is one of sheer shock and dismay that the government wasn't there in force on Tuesday last. the interpretation is that the once great United States has sunk so low under BushCo's leadership. i don't buy it's all BushCo's fault, but he sure is fiddlin' good. as mentioned before, the sources here are not just commonplace. there is a substantial representation of reporters from the international financial community included in my sample. that can't be good for us.



#38655: ekzept — 09/03  at  09:46 PM
you know BushCo is in trouble when Newt Gingrich begins to criticize:
Newt Gingrich, the Republican former speaker of the house, said that the administration's response to the hurricane raised questions about the nation's ability to cope with a terrorist attack.

"I think it puts into question all of the homeland security [planning] . . . because if we can't respond faster than this to an event we saw coming across the Gulf for days, then why do we think we're prepared to respond to a nuclear or biological attack?" Mr Gingrich said.
this was reported in the Financial Times.



#38658: arensb — 09/03  at  11:17 PM
(let's pray and send bibles to New Orleans!)

Correction: the article quoted at Free Republic says,
The Gideons International are sending 40,000 Personal Witnessing Testaments (New Testament, Psalms, Proverbs) to be distributed at the Astrodome and other relief centers in Houston...

Houston, not New Orleans. So it's not quite as brain-damaged.



#38661: Alon Levy — 09/03  at  11:53 PM
A few Jewish fundamentalists are arguing that Katrina was punishment for the evacuation of Jewish settlers from Gaza Strip...



Page 2 of 4 pages  <  1 2 3 4 >

Next entry: Creationism, RedState style

Previous entry: Our official state religion

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college