Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Saturday, September 03, 2005

Republican failure, Republican blame

I agree in part with Mike Dunford, who thinks there is plenty of blame to go around. It's true that the catastrophe in New Orleans is due to many factors—uncontrollable ones, like the probability of a large hurricane striking the city; passive ones, like Democrats and scientists not fighting stupidity hard enough; active ones, like the dedicated work of Republicans to gut government effectiveness. In a sense, yes, we can say that the disaster is the fault of all Americans.

Unfortunately, that attitude also encourages a kind of passivity, and also enables politicians who say things like this:

"I hope people don't play politics during this period of time," Mr. Bush told Diane Sawyer of ABC's "Good Morning America" in the Roosevelt Room of the White House. "This is a natural disaster, the likes of which our country may have never seen before."

Wrong. This is the time to play politics. We are supposed to be a democracy, and that requires the active engagement of the citizenry in assessing matters of policy. It is our responsibility to listen and observe the decisions of our leaders, and toss out the rascals who do badly and promote the ones who do well. It is exactly in these situations of crisis where policies are tested and we are in the best position to judge. And contrary to Mike, while we clearly have failures at all levels of the process, this is the time where it is our job to stand up and point to specific points of error. It is also obvious that there is one huge, dominant factor that has been operating over decades to culminate now, in this problem and many others: the Republican party. The party of know-nothings, incompetence, greed, bigotry, religious intolerance, and irresponsibility. We now have the government they wanted, and that we allowed them to have.

Robert Farley summarizes our situation. That Bush quote above is a perfect example of the denial of responsibility going on here.

The Republicans have managed a nifty trick over the last twenty-five years. They have worked ceaselessly to make government less effective, while at the same time deriving political benefit from inadequate government. The Republican attack on good governance involves the cutting of necessary funding, the wholesale transfer of critical government capabilities to the private sector, the stocking of government agencies with inept, corrupt, and obstructionist appointees, and the sellout of regulatory agencies to the industries they're supposed to observe.

In a fair world, all of this would result in the Republican party taking some degree of blame for bad governance. In this world, the exact opposite seems to happen. Government fails by design. Government failure feeds into an anti-statist narrative that allows the Republicans to further slash funding, to further gut federal agencies, and to further cripple the capacity of the government to do anything useful.

So where are we at now? Paul Krugman knows.

So America, once famous for its can-do attitude, now has a can't-do government that makes excuses instead of doing its job. And while it makes those excuses, Americans are dying.

Molly Ivins knows.

In fact, there is now a governmentwide movement away from basing policy on science, expertise and professionalism, and in favor of choices based on ideology. If you're wondering what the ideological position on flood management might be, look at the pictures of New Orleans—it seems to consist of gutting the programs that do anything.

We have to wake up. Mike is right to blame scientists and Democrats and all American citizens for allowing this leadership disaster to happen, but we have to look to the source of the decisions that led us to this place. We have to recognize what the goals of the Republican party are.

The Republican agenda is to turn the United States into a third-world shithole.

Not by explicit intent, of course, but by neglect, the promotion of incompetence, and short-sightedness. By treating government as a kleptocracy. By governing badly. By pandering to the stupid, by advocating superstition (let's pray and send bibles to New Orleans!), by poisoning our educational system with nonsense, by haring off on destructive wars that enrich corporate cronies, by belittling expertise and favoring ideology, by ignoring freaking reality.

We're at one of those critical points in history. We can either destroy the Republican party by kicking every one of the bastards out of office*, or we can watch them destroy our country. This is the time for partisanship. I pick the side of America.


*Now, if only there were an actual opposition party to make this effort easier…


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/2851/5A9REJ30/

Comments:
#38662: ekzept — 09/03  at  11:54 PM
to balance things out a bit, NO Mayor Nagin <a href="http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Local_response_to_Katrina_a_'Local_Disgrace'">apparently didn't follow a preplanned script</a> when dealing with the oncoming hurricane Katrina. there may have been complications, and the decision to order evacuation might have weighed heavily, considering the cost of false alarm. but it looks wrong.

given the big picture and the resources which a federal administration has compared to a mayor, you'd think, even if Nagin messed up, somebody from the White House would call him and advise him otherwise.



#38663: ekzept — 09/03  at  11:56 PM
A few Jewish fundamentalists are arguing that Katrina was punishment for the evacuation of Jewish settlers from Gaza Strip...
might as well blame it on the mezzuzot in synagogues in New Orleans not being "up to code".



#38665: donna — 09/04  at  12:37 AM
Whining? This isn't whining -this is outrage.

OK, you want to know what should have been different. How about:

Bush not vacation two more days before taking action

FEMA taking responsibilty to do its job

Bush calling out the National Guard immediately, if not prearing them BEFORE the hurricane hit

Not telling Amtrak they didn't need their help getting people out

Giving people of NOLA $$$, buses and funding to get out the path of the flooding

etc, etc, etc.

We can come up with all kinds of ways it should have been better, if that makes you happy. Or, you can realize we've been saying this would happen for years now. You want to wait until disaster happens to you, or wake up and get these people out of office, already? Because I guarantee you - they won't be there for you when it's your turn.



#38667: — 09/04  at  01:52 AM
I'm not sure this is funny, but if it is, this is the place to post it:

If we don't rebuild New Orleans, then God will have won.



#38668: Alon Levy — 09/04  at  02:43 AM
About voting the Republicans out of office, I'm still not convinced that it will help. Yes, Bush's ability to lead isn't in doubt - it's clear it's nonexistent. But it doesn't mean the alternative is much better. Dean or Clinton might have done good work here, with emphasis on "might." Kerry would definitely not have been any better. Edwards seems like someone who's good for passionate rhetoric but not for decisive action. It's like California's governors - Gray Davis was immensely corrupt and incompetent, but Arnold Schwarzenegger isn't much better.



#38669: — 09/04  at  02:48 AM
New Orleans was becoming Lake New Orleans, and President Bush was doing what Roman Emperor Nero allegedly did.

As Nero allegedly strummed his lyre, Rome burned.

As Bush seemingly strummed his guitar, New Orleans drowned.



#38670: — 09/04  at  02:52 AM
And I wonder what all the ultra-individualist "I don't want the government to help me" people think of one response to the Katrina disaster:

Looting.

After all, the looters are showing individual initiative, rather than waiting for the government to help them.



#38671: Alon Levy — 09/04  at  06:10 AM
Well, didn't Nero burn Rome himself in order to scapegoat the Christians? I don't know that the United States has developed the ability to control the weather - in light of recent events, I doubt that even if there were such a device the US government would be able to use it (or maybe it tried to hit New York but hit New Orleans instead?).



#38676: — 09/04  at  09:44 AM
There is, and should be, plenty of blame to go around in this mess. The blame starts at the city level and works its way up the chain all the way to Dubya.
In his interview with Diane Sawyer, Dubya said that now was not the time to play politics. WRONG! It is exactly the time to play politics. We elect these fools to serve the people in times of national crisis and to run the city, state and nation in normal times. Now is the time to judge the performance of these idiots.
Since 9/11 the nation has spent a fortune supposedly ramping up the ability to respond to a national crisis. This is the first real test of that increased ability. How is it working so far?
They send 20,000 people to the Superdome but forget to put anyone in charge or supply and protect the facility. The government (city, state and federal) wrings its hands when it turns into the worlds largest and most dangerous toilet. How is it working so far?
To paraphrase someone smarter than I am: The GOP has distinguished itself by: governing badly; declaring war on science; pandering to the stupid; openly advocating superstition as educational policy and poisoning our educational system with nonsense; creating and supporting destructive wars that enrich corporate cronies; by consistently belittling expertise and favoring ideology and, at every opportunity, ignoring reality.
And still working class America supports them. How is it working so far?
An old Soviet leader was quoted as saying that they would hang America and a corrupt capitalist system would sell them the rope. Well, we know that isn’t so. A corrupt and inefficient Soviet system imploded. It is more likely that we will hang ourselves and an apathetic public will buy the rope, tie the knot and toss the line over the branch of “family values.” How is it working so far?



's avatar #38681: — 09/04  at  10:35 AM
The latest local news is that the swedish help offer has today been refused into US air space due to lackings in US logistics. So it is stuck here, in standby.

The paper cites the Rescue Services international manager as surprised. It continues to say that his personal judgement, after talking with several collegues in Europe and US, is that US wants to avoid a situation where it can not handle the relief offered. He speculates that the problem is that the relief will be stuck in the airport for several days, thus creating (comparatively more) criticism.

*** Note! Serious hindsight comment will follow. Do not read if such is upsetting for you. ***

It is of course hard to be prepared for disasters. But setting up disaster organisations beforehand and do training helps.

This spring asian tsunami with 500+ travelling swedes killed showed realted structural problems in our (national and international) disaster organisation. These problems were thought to be handled since the last time. (A Baltic Sea ship catastrophy with 900+ individuals killed.)

It turned out our (social democrat) government, which currently has a Bush type strong leader, formed disaster organisations to rely on that leaders directions. (Earlier dissection of events had concluded that they should be highly autonomous.) He had also refused several national training events for the government itself as 'unnecessary'.

Now I am curious. Will there be a US declaration of 'war on catastrophes' to focus resources on organisation and training?



's avatar #38682: — 09/04  at  10:47 AM
Oh. On the tsunami I also seem to remember that US help was mentioned here as a good example on swiftness and expertise. But of course it is easier when the organisation is shipped in wholesale instead of having partly been subjected to the mess.



's avatar #38685: Ken Cope — 09/04  at  10:57 AM
From the NY Times

But in Houston, there were hot showers, crates of Bibles and stacks of pizzas, while in New Orleans, many refugees scrounged for diapers, water and basic survival.

Providing Bibles was thoughtful, as toilet paper has got to be in short supply.



's avatar #38690: — 09/04  at  11:06 AM
OK, I think the hurricane disaster is terrible, and i know I haven't grasped the situation being on the outside peering in.

But if we have to do jokes as a relief effort I must say that printing bibles is ruining perfectly good toilet paper - you will end up with your ass black as sin. As usual it looks like the devil is in the fine print.



's avatar #38691: Ken Cope — 09/04  at  11:29 AM
Sin, devils, details... They had nothing else to resort to for toilet paper, as the usual gang of idiots has by now flushed the last recognizable shreds of the Constitution.



#38692: — 09/04  at  11:38 AM
There's no evidence that Nero burned Rome to blame the Christians. It seems unlikely that an Emperor would pay such a price and endanger himself to attack an insignificant religious sect that made up a fraction of a percent of the Empire's population. Nero was self-absorbed, not insane.



's avatar #38693: — 09/04  at  11:54 AM
Is a soaked Constitution a 'pulp fiction'?

Seriously, if the horribly termed 'War on Terror' ('wot' is that, anyway?) already somehow:
- established a de facto permanent state of war
- started an illegal, or at least an outside UN agreed procedure, aggressive overseas war
- allowed indefinite prisoning without court procedure
- abrogates the Geneva convention on said 'war' prisoners

... what will another catastrophe do to a challenged society?



's avatar #38694: — 09/04  at  12:07 PM
Um, I confess to be confused here - it is 'War On Terrorism' according to the DoD web pages. But it is still a misnomer.



#38705: ekzept — 09/04  at  01:48 PM
Torbjörn,
... established a de facto permanent state of war ...
the history of the United States since World War I suggests it has been in a permanent state of war since that time, aggravated by World War II, then cemented by the Cold War. Woodrow Wilson was concerned about this but, then, had his stroke and could do no more about it. indeed, there were opponents of intervention in World War II who argued that entering the war, however needed and worthwhile, would result in granting the President powers they would never give back to Congress where they belong, and would therefore be an important step along the road to dictatorship.

i think the "War on Terror" is as much a statement that this government and country no longer knows how to function without being "at war". neocons say the United States beat the Soviets (variously) by "spending them into the ground", but i believe it cost us dearly, too, in liberty, self-reliance, and excessive entanglement in foreign affairs.



#38706: ekzept — 09/04  at  01:52 PM
this just in from Downing Street:
The UK today began sending aid to the United States for relief operations in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

500,000 military ration packs will be airlifted to the US over the next few days. The first contributions will set off tomorrow morning.

Though the delivery of rations is a key priority, the Government is also looking urgently at providing other relief items sought by the US. These items may be sent from the UK or be purchased closer to the affected region

Aid from UK is being provided in response to a first request for assistance from the US Government received this morning, and essential relief items being pursued include blankets, tarpaulins, camp beds and military tentage. UK experts have been sent to work alongside US staff co-ordinating the provision of assistance from contributing countries.

Given the UK currently holds the European Union Presidency, we are also co-ordinating the response of other EU states to the US Government's request. EU states have offered items such as medical teams, water purification units, camp beds, blankets and specialist personnel.



#38707: ekzept — 09/04  at  01:59 PM
DHS Secretary Chertoff admits "mistakes were made" and that, in addition the US would have to confront the “greatest environmental mess we have seen in this country.”



's avatar #38712: — 09/04  at  02:33 PM
"the history of the United States since World War I suggests it has been in a permanent state of war since that time,"

As I understand it, usually a nation has a constitution for peace. When it goes to war (attacking or defending against another nation) it puts it aside and institutes a 'state of war' and appropriate measures. I guess it does so also for massive civilian unrest or civil war.

My feeling is that the term 'war' was improperly used. (How do you make 'war' against small groups of crazies hidden inside large populations?) And I think that US has lately instituted indefinite (de facto permanent) special measures that are analogous to 'state of war' measures. Perhaps the Constitution will be amended?

I am glad that foreign relief from is finally accepted.



#38713: ekzept — 09/04  at  02:49 PM
as horrid as the loss of life is, another Republican failure and failure of the republic i just learned about is how the federalist formula and weakening of government contributed directly to the lovely $3.50/gallon gas we're experiencing. this is more than what's laughingly called United States energy policy. the reason refineries are in Louisiana and oil wells bunched in the western Gulf of Mexico is because they can't be where commercially they want to be. specifically, the domes having oil are off the Florida coast, with more being on its east.

Florida, as a tourist mecca, doesn't want to risk having its beaches despoiled and, so, has long banned drilling off its shores, or close to them. oil companies can drill to domes sideways.

i don't know the policies in Alabama or Mississippi, but apparently refineries are in Louisiana because Louisiana welcomes them. what would make greater economic sense is to move the rigs closer to where the oil is, and bring the refineries along.

while this would not get them out of hurricanes' paths, it would distribute them more uniformly.

naturally, there is no grand federal plan to manage these energy resources as there is in many other countries. in fact, when oil companies go bankrupt, the knowledge of energy sources and exploration is most often lost with them, as it is part of their property. in other countries, the energy resources belong to the country and, in case of financial failure, get auctioned off to anyone interested. similarly, in other countries, it's feasible to knock local heads together to get a result and energy practice which is better for the good of the country as a whole. here such authority is delegated to individual states.

the double-whammy here is primarily that, even if the refineries get back online, they're short-staffed, with labor having to live at a distance, the local conditions being uninhabitable.

this is in part from an editorial in the Financial Times and in part from the Science Friday program on the subject cited elsewhere.



Trackback: The Third World Shithole Tracked on: BAD ATTITUDES (12.171.208.22) at 2005 09 04 14:51:39
From Pharyngula, via Mahablog: The Republican agenda is to turn the United States into a third-world shithole. Not by explicit intent, of course, but by neglect, the promotion of incompetence, and short-sightedness. By treating government as a kleptocracy. By governing...



's avatar #38714: — 09/04  at  02:56 PM
On a personal note, this is the third (!) time in that an interesting place that I intended to visit again has been more or less destroyed.

First time in US I passed New York, chosed Empire State as lookout point and thought 'next time WTC'.

First time in Thailand/Chambodia had 1 day in Phuket (I couldn't miss Angkor Wat or Bangkok) and thought 'next time more days'.

Last time in US I passed New Orleans on route to Miami, had 1 day and thought 'next time more days'.

I guess the Earth is finite in more senses than the spatial...



's avatar #38715: — 09/04  at  03:02 PM
Fourth time, dammit. There was some places in former Yugoslavia I had pegged as 'must return', too. They bombed them all. So it is 2-2 between war and natural catastrophes.



Page 3 of 4 pages « First  <  1 2 3 4 >

Next entry: Creationism, RedState style

Previous entry: Our official state religion

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college