Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Saturday, September 03, 2005

Republican failure, Republican blame

I agree in part with Mike Dunford, who thinks there is plenty of blame to go around. It's true that the catastrophe in New Orleans is due to many factors—uncontrollable ones, like the probability of a large hurricane striking the city; passive ones, like Democrats and scientists not fighting stupidity hard enough; active ones, like the dedicated work of Republicans to gut government effectiveness. In a sense, yes, we can say that the disaster is the fault of all Americans.

Unfortunately, that attitude also encourages a kind of passivity, and also enables politicians who say things like this:

"I hope people don't play politics during this period of time," Mr. Bush told Diane Sawyer of ABC's "Good Morning America" in the Roosevelt Room of the White House. "This is a natural disaster, the likes of which our country may have never seen before."

Wrong. This is the time to play politics. We are supposed to be a democracy, and that requires the active engagement of the citizenry in assessing matters of policy. It is our responsibility to listen and observe the decisions of our leaders, and toss out the rascals who do badly and promote the ones who do well. It is exactly in these situations of crisis where policies are tested and we are in the best position to judge. And contrary to Mike, while we clearly have failures at all levels of the process, this is the time where it is our job to stand up and point to specific points of error. It is also obvious that there is one huge, dominant factor that has been operating over decades to culminate now, in this problem and many others: the Republican party. The party of know-nothings, incompetence, greed, bigotry, religious intolerance, and irresponsibility. We now have the government they wanted, and that we allowed them to have.

Robert Farley summarizes our situation. That Bush quote above is a perfect example of the denial of responsibility going on here.

The Republicans have managed a nifty trick over the last twenty-five years. They have worked ceaselessly to make government less effective, while at the same time deriving political benefit from inadequate government. The Republican attack on good governance involves the cutting of necessary funding, the wholesale transfer of critical government capabilities to the private sector, the stocking of government agencies with inept, corrupt, and obstructionist appointees, and the sellout of regulatory agencies to the industries they're supposed to observe.

In a fair world, all of this would result in the Republican party taking some degree of blame for bad governance. In this world, the exact opposite seems to happen. Government fails by design. Government failure feeds into an anti-statist narrative that allows the Republicans to further slash funding, to further gut federal agencies, and to further cripple the capacity of the government to do anything useful.

So where are we at now? Paul Krugman knows.

So America, once famous for its can-do attitude, now has a can't-do government that makes excuses instead of doing its job. And while it makes those excuses, Americans are dying.

Molly Ivins knows.

In fact, there is now a governmentwide movement away from basing policy on science, expertise and professionalism, and in favor of choices based on ideology. If you're wondering what the ideological position on flood management might be, look at the pictures of New Orleans—it seems to consist of gutting the programs that do anything.

We have to wake up. Mike is right to blame scientists and Democrats and all American citizens for allowing this leadership disaster to happen, but we have to look to the source of the decisions that led us to this place. We have to recognize what the goals of the Republican party are.

The Republican agenda is to turn the United States into a third-world shithole.

Not by explicit intent, of course, but by neglect, the promotion of incompetence, and short-sightedness. By treating government as a kleptocracy. By governing badly. By pandering to the stupid, by advocating superstition (let's pray and send bibles to New Orleans!), by poisoning our educational system with nonsense, by haring off on destructive wars that enrich corporate cronies, by belittling expertise and favoring ideology, by ignoring freaking reality.

We're at one of those critical points in history. We can either destroy the Republican party by kicking every one of the bastards out of office*, or we can watch them destroy our country. This is the time for partisanship. I pick the side of America.


*Now, if only there were an actual opposition party to make this effort easier…


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/2851/PeYQArMp/

Comments:
#38719: ekzept — 09/04  at  03:14 PM
As I understand it, usually a nation has a constitution for peace. When it goes to war (attacking or defending against another nation) it puts it aside and institutes a 'state of war' and appropriate measures.
don't work that way here, Torbjörn. we have a recipe for conducting war.

the central problem of the history i was citing is that for extended periods while there is no "declared war", a Constitutional concept, for various reasons tagged with the all-encompassing phrase "national security", the President retains wartime-like powers.

these include incredible powers to conduct operations in secret and, what would be especially troubling to the framers of the Constitution, to keep the budgets for these operations from most of Congress, never mind the general public.



Trackback: I'd love to be able to disagree, but.... Tracked on: CatchingFlies (66.151.149.25) at 2005 09 04 17:54:53
I think Peasy is on to something here. I'm feeling the same fed-uped-ness and want to scream it from the rooftops. Remember folks, we've got three years and five months of this crap left: The Republican agenda is to turn



#38758: ekzept — 09/04  at  10:12 PM
there's an article at the UK Telegraph which is an example of why some international analysis of American politics is better than what we get here. American media often like to pretend there's no overt manipulation of media and public whereas overseas outlets put it right out there.

the UK Telegraph can hardly be criticized as being "liberal", as it's viewpoint tends to the conservative and anti-Blair.



#38761: ekzept — 09/04  at  10:40 PM
if you pay attention, it doesn't look at all the case that everything is fine now. we're being fed spin. consider this report from CNN interviewing the Coast Guard:
Officials say they do not have the manpower, the resources or enough time to save everyone.

"My guys are coming back and telling me, 'Sir, I went into a house, and there are three elderly people in their beds, and they're gasping, and they're dying,' " Coast Guard Capt. Bruce Jones said.

"And we got calls today, 'We need you ... to go to a place in St. Bernard Parish. It's a hospice, ... and there are 10 dead and there are 10 dying.' But those people were probably alive yesterday or the day before."

Though pilots, rescue crew members and maintenance workers are red-eyed and exhausted, they're refusing to rest, CNN's Karl Penhaul reported.

For every person plucked from the flood, there are hundreds still waiting, rescuers say.

"There's simply not enough resources," Jones said.
where are they? they're all trying to figure out how to protect the President? why are Brown and Chertoff so opposed to tent cities? because if they're built, they'll be on the news week after week. using their current strategry, BushCo can sprinkle and dilute the evacuees from the Gulf so finely around the country, it won't be possible to tell it happened. and they'll be putting up barriers to people returning to New Orleans, making the problem and threshold of cleanup lower.

in fact, while i understand why they might want to evacuate all remaining people so cleanup measures can proceed unhindered, i have this vision of New Orleans becoming little more than a factory town to serve the oil, gas, and chemical industries nearby.

and, what's more, with only soldiers in New Orleans, BushCo can order them to shut up about what's actually going on, so the media and the public won't know. heck, BushCo may initially order the military to operate the refineries and things.



#38765: — 09/04  at  10:59 PM
Torbjorn, please don't ever pass through my city and think that you need to revisit.



#38777: Alon Levy — 09/05  at  02:54 AM
the UK Telegraph can hardly be criticized as being "liberal", as it's viewpoint tends to the conservative and anti-Blair.

Well, its nickname is the Torygraph, so the word "tends" in your post may be somewhat of an understatement.



#38791: — 09/05  at  07:20 AM
New Orleans's disaster plan : (1) build levees for a cat. 3 storm, (2) in the event of a cat. 4 or 5 storm, panic and order evacuation, (3) fail to mobilize the hundreds of NO school buses and municipal buses to evacuate the disabled or poor people, and (4) blame the feds.

I think President Bush deserves some criticism for not sending the air cavalry or patroopers with orders to shoot looters on sight.



#38836: Alon Levy — 09/05  at  12:05 PM
Or, alternatively:

1) Tell people to evacuate
2) ????
3) Weather the disaster with no loss of life and minimal destruction of property



#38901: — 09/05  at  05:15 PM
send bibles to New Orleans!


I would imagine they burn them for heat and fuel. Atleast I would

-----
"As with all of ID, the important thing is first to have the concept. Production can then follow as a matter of course.” -Dembski



's avatar #39008: Raven — 09/06  at  07:57 AM
From the (*snortle*) Business Reporting section of the Boston Herald:


Brown pushed from last job: Horse group: FEMA chief had to be `asked to resign'
By Brett Arends
Saturday, September 3, 2005 - Updated: 02:01 PM EST

The federal official in charge of the bungled New Orleans rescue was fired from his last private-sector job overseeing horse shows.

And before joining the Federal Emergency Management Agency as a deputy director in 2001, GOP activist Mike Brown had no significant experience that would have qualified him for the position.

The Oklahoman got the job through an old college friend who at the time was heading up FEMA.

...



Full story here:

http://business.bostonherald.com/businessNews/view.bg?articleid=100857



#39065: ekzept — 09/06  at  12:45 PM
yeah, now Bush himself wants to lead the inquiry as to what went wrong in Katrina's aftermath. like that makes a lot of sense. it's like asking NASA to investigate what happened on Columbia or Challenger.



#39078: ekzept — 09/06  at  03:58 PM
litany of failures of government to help the people of the Gulf Coast is available at The Agitator.



Trackback: Republican failure, Republican blame Tracked on: News from Around the World (82.165.239.114) at 2005 09 06 17:37:04
The first time we looked at this, we weren't sure:...



's avatar #39236: — 09/07  at  05:34 PM
exzept:
"the central problem of the history i was citing is that for extended periods while there is no "declared war", a Constitutional concept, for various reasons tagged with the all-encompassing phrase "national security", the President retains wartime-like powers."

I think your comments are interesting. So the constitution of the most important nation is easily put aside and not followed anymore? That would be scary!

Dave:
I am sorry for your city that is so uninteresting and for you that has chosen to live there. On the other hand what is interesting for one person can not be divined by another so I feel free to visit.



's avatar #39239: — 09/07  at  05:50 PM
Ooohhh! Dave, I think I have been unnecessarily rude. Your comment should of course be interpreted as a joke. My apologies; it is way past bed time and I was just too tired to engage all parts of my brain synchronously.

Yes, perhaps I bring bad luck. But I have also visited 100's of cities without any citywide problems. So it is not a regular thing with me. grin



#39240: ekzept — 09/07  at  05:51 PM
I think your comments are interesting. So the constitution of the most important nation is easily put aside and not followed anymore? That would be scary!
yes, it is scary. it has long been blamed upon nuclear standoff with the Soviets and the need to go to war at a moment's notice, but i don't believe that. i don't believe that because Woodrow Wilson and other Presidents were worried about it, and that was before there was a nuclear bomb.

i believe it even less now. i think the United States Congress, the President, and the people of the United States are all getting lazy, and are unwilling to do the extra work needed to keep a representative democracy vibrant. that means doing extra work to pick out good candidates, demand that they have substantive election campaigns and debates, and demand that Congress take back the power it ceded to the Presidency when this extended emergency began. it's just so much easier to delegate it all to one guy, the President, and their administration. that's sure what happened in ancient Athens, in France lots of times, and that's how dictators are started.

so, yeah, scary, but i don't know what we can do about it.



#39258: ekzept — 09/07  at  11:25 PM
from Salon:
After a Cabinet meeting on Tuesday, Bush warned against the "blame game" as he pointed his finger: "Bureaucracy is not going to stand in the way of getting the job done for the people." His aides briefed reporters on background that "bureaucracy" of course referred to state and local officials. That night, at the White House, Bush met with congressional leaders of both parties, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi urged Bush to fire Brown. "Why would I do that?" the president replied. "Because of all that went wrong, of all that didn't go right last week," she explained. To which he answered, "What didn't go right?"

Bush's denigration of "bureaucracy" raises the question of the principals responsible in his own bureaucracy. Within hours of the president's statement, the Associated Press reported that FEMA director Michael Brown had waited five hours after the hurricane struck to request 1,000 workers from Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff. Part of their mission, he wrote, would be to "convey a positive image" of the administration's response.

The New Orleans Times-Picayune disclosed that Max Mayfield, head of the National Hurricane Center, briefed Brown and Chertoff before the hurricane made landfall of its potential disastrous consequences. "We were briefing them way before landfall," Mayfield said. "It's not like this was a surprise. We had in the advisories that the levee could be topped." The day after Bush's Cabinet room attack on bureaucracy, the St. Petersburg Times revealed that Mayfield had also briefed President Bush in a video conference call. "I just wanted to be able to go to sleep that night knowing that I did all I could do," Mayfield said.



#39348: ekzept — 09/08  at  03:23 PM
another comment on what Torbjörn Larsson asked about above: the Constitution also allows each representatives house to make up its own rules about what's permitted or not and how legislative business is to be conducted. in the case of a majority party, this allows a good deal of abuse. i cannot say if it has happened before or not, but with the embarrassment of hurricane Katrina splatting all over them, IMO the Republicans are resorting to grossly undemocratic means and measures to (essentially) buy themselves out of a deep political hole. the latest is the report that with $52 billion of emergency aid requested from BushCo, the bill was presented to the House of Representatives for a vote without anyone being able to see the text of its contents.

i don't know if there is or is not, but the entire principle of having "hidden legislation" is hugely dangerous. i mean, they could slide the entire Patriot Act II in there without anyone knowing and, at the same time, accuse anyone in opposition voting against it on procedural grounds, that they were keeping aid from the suffering people of the Gulf Coast.

in other words, emergencies are a venue for those in power to grab more power. the damn thing about it is, i don't hear any uproar on the part of the American public about this. i hear them grumbling about the price of petrol.

i fear we are sliding into not only a permanent state of war, but a permanent state of emergency, possibly martial law. and Tony Blair was worried about lack of a free political process in China: hah !



Page 4 of 4 pages « First  <  2 3 4

Next entry: Creationism, RedState style

Previous entry: Our official state religion

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college