Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Wednesday, July 20, 2005

Sex in the MRI

This morning I got a question in e-mail, asking if I'd heard of a particular paper. Of course I had, it's a very fun bit of research...and then I realized I'd never mentioned it on the weblog before. I guess it's because it's focused entirely on the phylum Chordata, specifically one rather peculiar species—Homo sapiens. I probably just assumed nobody would be interested, because there aren't any arthropods or molluscs in it.

The paper is all about visualizing the arrangement of organs during coitus. People have tried to figure out how the pieces all fit together internally using cadavers and their imagination, by using a speculum and poking around with their fingers, and by clever tools, like hollow glass tubes shaped like a penis. This paper tries something different: the investigators had people have sex in an MRI tube, and snapped a few pictures while they were at it.

This wasn't easy. If any of you have seen an MRI tube, they tend to be small and cramped, difficult for claustrophobics to handle, and a tight enough squeeze for one person, let alone two. The methods section is the most interesting I've ever read.

The participants (pairs of men and women) were recruited by personal invitation and through a local scientific television programme. Respondents were invited to participate if they met the following criteria: older than 18 years, intact uterus and ovaries, and a small to average weight/height index. The experimental procedure was explained in a letter sent to respondents along with an informed consent form. Participants were assured confidentiality, privacy, anonymity, and the possibility of withdrawing from the study at any time. After written informed consent had been obtained, the participants were invited to come for a scan when the equipment was available on a Saturday.

The tube in which the couple would have intercourse stood in a room next to a control room where the searchers were sitting behind the scanning console and screen. An improvised curtain covered the window between the two rooms, so the intercom was the only means of communication. Imaging was first done in a 1.5 Tesla Philips magnet system (Gyroscan S15) and later in a 1.5 Tesla magnet system from Siemens Vision. To increase the space in the tube, the table was removed: the internal diameter of the tube is then 50 cm. The participants were asked to lie with pelvises near the marked centre of the tube and not to move during imaging. After a preview, 10 mm thick sagittal images were taken with a half-Fourier acquisition single shot turbo SE T2 weighted pulse sequence (HASTE). The echo time was 64 ms, with a repetition time of 4.4 ms. With this fast acquisition technique, 11 slices of relatively good quality were obtained within 14 seconds.

The volunteers were shown the equipment in the two rooms, and personal and gynaecological histories were taken. The experimental procedure was explained, and all investigators left the imaging room. After a preliminary image for positioning the true pelvis of the woman was taken, the first image was taken with her lying on her back (image 1). Then the male was asked to climb into the tube and begin face to face coitus in the superior position (image 2). After this shot—successful or not—the man was asked to leave the tube and the woman was asked to stimulate her clitoris manually and to inform the researchers by intercom when she had reached the preorgasmic stage. Then she stopped the autostimulation for a third image (image 3). After that image was taken the woman restarted the stimulation to achieve an orgasm. Twenty minutes after the orgasm, the fourth image was taken (image 4). At the end of the experiment, the images were evaluated in the presence of the participants.

Science porn! Maybe the stuff about 1.5 Tesla magnets and T2 weighted imaging gets in the way of the romance, but it lets us cut straight to the action. Unfortunately, it sounds like action was hard to come by—while the ladies were willing, the guys seemed to have, umm, flopped. The researchers say the experiment was only possible thanks to the availability of a drug called sildenafil (aka Viagra), with one exception.

We did not foresee that the men would have more problems with sexual performance (maintaining their erection) than the women in the scanner. All the women had a complete sexual response, but they described their orgasm as superficial. Only the first couple was able to perform coitus adequately without sildenafil (experiments 1 and 2). The reason might be that they were the only participants in the real sense: involved in the research right from the beginning because of their scientific curiosity, knowledge of the body, and artistic commitment. And as amateur street acrobats they are trained and used to performing under stress.

Dang. My experimental animals are fish, Danio rerio. I wonder if I could switch my lab over to studying small, curious street acrobats?

Anyway, here is a sample of the results. We're looking at the pelvic region of the two people rotated into an upright position; the woman is on the left, the man on the right. You'll just have to stare at it a bit and let your imagination go to work, and you'll figure out what's where.

coitus MRIcoitus MRI
Midsagittal image of the anatomy of sexual intercourse. P=penis, Ur=urethra, Pe=perineum, U=uterus, S=symphysis, B=bladder, I=intestine, L5=lumbar 5, Sc=scrotum

I have to admit, though, that although it sounds like an experiment that was a great deal of fun, they didn't learn anything too surprising. They notice that the penis is more contorted than expected, although I had to wonder if that wasn't just a consequence of the difficulty of having sex in a narrow tube. Intromission didn't seem to do much to the female anatomy (no surprise, again), but one interesting observation was that the female reproductive tract does jigger itself around in curious ways during arousal and orgasm. Here are photos of the female pelvis at rest, just before and a short time after orgasm.

coitus MRI
Midsagittal images of sexual response in a multiparous woman: (left) at rest; (centre) pre-orgasmic phase; (right) 20 minutes after orgasm

What you should be able to see is that the uterus is progressively displace upwards, stretching the anterior wall of the vagina. So you see, guys, while all looks no different from the outside, strange and subtle things are shifting around on the inside. All we need to know for sure is to take an MRI of her brain during orgasm, or of her pelvis within 20 minutes or so.


Schultz WW, van Andel P, Sabelis I, Mooyaart E (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging of male and female genitals during coitus and female sexual arousal. BMJ 319:1596-1600.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/2610/bZPG8xBN/

Comments:
#32474: — 07/20  at  01:10 PM
Certainly an unexpected topic..

Question: What is the difference between "Homo sapiens sapiens and Homo sapiens.."? I heard it on a different forum, someone mentioned it and I never heard of it before..

-----
"As with all of ID, the important thing is first to have the concept. Production can then follow as a matter of course.” -Dembski



#32475: saurabh — 07/20  at  01:19 PM
You better watch out, PZ. You're going to be getting angry email from Fleshbot complaining that you're stealing their clientele.



's avatar #32477: Chris Clarke — 07/20  at  01:27 PM
although I had to wonder if that wasn't just a consequence of the difficulty of having sex in a narrow tube.


But how else whould you... oh. Never mind.

"I do not think we should antagonize the religious when it is not warranted, though I think we should be willing to do so whenever it is.”
-- Glen Davidson



#32478: — 07/20  at  01:33 PM
Whoo! Ain't science cool? The woman's change in internal architecture is interesting. I knew things moved around, but I didn't realize to what extent.

I wonder how many couples they recruited for this, and why they had such a hard time finding ones who were up to the pressure (pun intended). I would have suggested they try to recruit in the leather community-they'd find people who not only would be willing to perform under stress, they're used to it, and they like it.



's avatar #32479: PZ Myers — 07/20  at  01:39 PM
They had 8 couples and 3 single women. They had to be small enough to fit as well as game to do the act semi-publicly, which probably limits their volunteer pool.

Finding people with a kink that makes confinement arousing is an interesting idea. It might be hard for most geeky scientist types to find the leather community...I know I would have no idea.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#32481: dr. dave — 07/20  at  02:09 PM
<butthead>

Uhhh... huh-huh-huh...

they said "Siemens"...

</butthead>



's avatar #32483: John M. Price — 07/20  at  02:15 PM
On H. sapiens sapiens and the more typical H. sapiens.

A bit ago, perhaps still extant in some discussions, the relationship of us to other extinct Homo was questioned. The particular nomenclature you note is from that period, and also included H. sapiens neandertalis as another of the subspecies.

I don't think it caught on in any real sense, and Neandertal is likely best seen as a separate species, and not a fellow subspecies.

Of course, time will tell....



#32484: madbard — 07/20  at  02:49 PM
But why dig out this five year old paper now, PZ?



's avatar #32485: PZ Myers — 07/20  at  02:50 PM
First paragraph.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#32486: madbard — 07/20  at  03:00 PM
mea culpa (read too fast) tongue laugh



#32488: — 07/20  at  03:38 PM
I believe my scientific name is Homo neanderthalensis. It's possible we are the ancestors to some of you, even if there are no genes clearly present today in Homo sapiens.

Now, to the topic at hand: I'd love to provide some insights into my innards during coitus, but they need to build a bigger machine! Quite some atavistic stirrings happening here, though... interesting images! Heh-heh!



#32489: — 07/20  at  03:40 PM
Hey, where's my picture?



#32492: — 07/20  at  04:11 PM
the uterus is progressively displace upwards, stretching the anterior wall of the vagina
Does that mean that female orgasm increases the chance of insemination? That would have some interesting evolutionary consequences..



#32494: pough — 07/20  at  06:18 PM
The pictures are too blurry. As far as I can tell, orgasms fill a woman's bladder.



#32495: donna — 07/20  at  07:02 PM
No wonder I always have to pee after sex....



's avatar #32497: Nullifidian — 07/20  at  07:34 PM
A bit ago, perhaps still extant in some discussions, the relationship of us to other extinct Homo was questioned. The particular nomenclature you note is from that period, and also included H. sapiens neandertalis as another of the subspecies.

I don't think it caught on in any real sense, and Neandertal is likely best seen as a separate species, and not a fellow subspecies.

Of course, time will tell....

It's time to dust off Homo sapiens sapiens, regardless of the status of the Neandertals--which I happen to agree are separate species--because of the discovery of the Herto hominins, Homo sapiens idaltu. Thus if one wants to specifically refer to modern hominins, excluding the Herto specimens, the term to use is Homo sapiens sapiens again.

"We are obliged, therefore, to spread the news, painful and bitter though it may be for some to hear, that all living things on earth are kindred.” Edward Abbey, Desert Solitaire



's avatar #32498: Nullifidian — 07/20  at  07:35 PM
Erm, change "modern hominins" to "extant hominins." That'll teach me not to use the Preview button.

"We are obliged, therefore, to spread the news, painful and bitter though it may be for some to hear, that all living things on earth are kindred.” Edward Abbey, Desert Solitaire



#32502: — 07/20  at  09:00 PM
Orgasm is a fascinating subject worth study. (Both within and without science, of course!)

But it seems this is a time when women will be most studied at first. Didn't they found that when they put men inside for PET/MRI brain scans the male orgasm was too fast to observe yet?

On the other hand we already have disproof of the cliché that only men gets braindead by sex...



#32510: Jo Fish — 07/20  at  11:12 PM
So would this be the uhhh, science of the "big bang". Sorry, I just had to say it.

Please dear god don't let the fundies find out about this...or there will really be a big bang.

sorry for posting this to the wrong thread. that stupid captcha got me when I tried to get out of "preview".



's avatar #32513: — 07/21  at  12:08 AM
Good observation, pough! If the lady goes to the bathroom, (like lucky Donna), she enjoyed an orgasm. She doesn't, she was faking it. If jaimito goes to the kitchen to have a cold beer and a sandwich, it was OK. If doesn't, forget it, never happens.

Quod natura non sunt turpia



#32514: — 07/21  at  12:34 AM
No fair. When I volunteered to be a test subject all they did was feed me antihistamines and force me to stay awake in a boring room for 12 hours. :(



's avatar #32515: Virge — 07/21  at  01:27 AM
Subjects with pacemakers need not apply.



#32517: Alon Levy — 07/21  at  02:02 AM
Subjects with pacemakers need not apply.


Respondents were invited to participate if they met the following criteria: older than 18 years, intact uterus and ovaries, and a small to average weight/height index.


Discrimination! I'm suing!



Trackback: Paired Participants Needed for High Flux Fling Tracked on: PhaWRONGula (72.9.234.70) at 2005 07 21 02:11:30
"We plan to record the position Of genitals during coition...



#32520: — 07/21  at  07:09 AM
You've also forgotten to mention one of the most important pieces of information about this particular paper: It won the Ig-Nobel Prize in Medicine. (2001, I think.)

If y'all haven't heard of the Igs, they're tremendously funny. Awarded every year, the week before the Nobel Prizes. Original citation was "For work that cannot or should not be reproduced"; it was changed a couple years ago to "for science that makes you laugh, then makes you think." All prizes awarded for honest-to-goodness real research papers or products, with relevant citations included.



Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

Next entry: Scotty has been beamed up

Previous entry: Hooooome!

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college