Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Friday, May 27, 2005

Strigamia maritima

Echoed on the Panda's Thumb

The journal BioEssays has a lovely series called "My favorite animal", in which biologists get to wax rhapsodic about their favorite creatures. It's a great idea, since not only does it mean we get some enthusiastic writing, but more exposure is given to organismal biology. I read so many papers that go on and on about some specific molecule and in which the only illustrations are photos of gels and blots that it's nice to see whole animals for a change.

This month, Arthur and Chipman wrote about a centipede, Strigamia maritima, and its development—so not only do I get animals, I get embryos. Oh, happy day!

Centipedes exhibit one of the underlying patterns of animal organization most vividly: segmentation. One strategy for making a larger animal in evolution without requiring a major increase in complexity is to build it from modular, repeating blocks, the segments. Arthur points out an interesting contradiction, though: while we argue for variation in segmentation as a feature manipulated by natural selection, most extant arthropod species have tightly fixed numbers of segments with no intraspecific variation. Centipedes are no exception. Three of the four major orders of centipedes have exactly 15 trunk segments, no more and no less. The one exception are the Geophilomorpha, which have secondarily lost segment number constancy and show variability between species, between populations, between sexes, and between individuals.

Strigamia maritima
Relationships of the four major orders of centipedes, showing the main changes that have taken place during the evolution of the lineage leading to the geophilomorphs.

So Arthur is studying the mechanisms of segmentation in wild populations of a centipede species with variable segment numbers. This could be fascinating stuff; unfortunately, they haven't published anything on how segment number is regulated yet, and essentially are documenting the basics and the similarities with other arthropods. And getting pretty pictures of this beautiful beast!

Strigamia maritima
A peripatoid in the process of hatching.
Strigamia maritima
An adult female coiled around an egg brood.

They're also analyzing segmentation in embryogenesis, and finding as expected that many of the same molecules we've found in other arthropods and in vertebrates and every other segmented animal are present here. The embryos are also lovely.

Strigamia maritima
Photos of DAPI-stained intact embryos of Strigamia maritima. A: Embryo at early stage of segmentation, after approximately 12 segments have formed; viewed from posterior-left. B: The same embryo viewed from anterior-left. C: Embryo at the end of the segmentation process, after almost all of the segments have been formed; viewed from above. Anterior is to the left; the ventral side of the embryo faces the outer surface of the egg. D: The same embryo viewed laterally. Anterior is to the left. All embryos are approximately 1 mm in diameter.

One thing they have discovered is that segmentation proceeds from anterior to posterior, and the animal probably uses something like a segmentation clock to tick off segments. One of the surprises in analyzing segmentation in Drosophila was the presence of the pair rule genes—genes that are turned on in every other segment and create a two segment periodicity. Arthur and Chapman have found a pair rule gene in Stragamia, odr-1, that is expressed in a two-segment period, and another gene, caudal that initially overlaps with odr-1 but then is activated in between the stripes as well, to generate a one-segment period.

Pair rule gene homologs in vertebrates, such as hairy, are expressed in a one segment period. One explanation for the different patterns is that the ancestral ur-segment corresponds to a pair of segments in arthropods, and that we vertebrates retain the primitive arrangement. Arthropods evolved a second mechanism (caudal would be part of it) that split the ur-segment in two, effectively doubling the segment number in one stroke.

One thing I will be very interested in seeing in the future is the mechanism for regulating the number of segments. Zebrafish also exhibit a small amount of variability in segment number, and it may be that the same processes are at work in both my favorite vertebrate and Arthur's favorite invertebrate.


Arthur W, Chipman AD (2005) The centipede Strigamia maritima: what it can tell us about the development and evolution of segmentation. BioEssays 27:653-660.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/2348/vLM98HDp/

Comments:
#26310: coturnix — 05/27  at  11:06 AM
If I remember correctly the number of segments(somites) in vertebrates is well regulated, though it differs between species. Are there vertebrate examples of variability in segment numbers between sexes or individuals?

I am assuming that number of types of vertebrae (thoracic vs. lumbar) and number of ribs in horses (it differes in Arabians and some heavy-draft breeds from the other horses) is something that develops later, i.e., after all the segments have already been formed.

My favourite segmentation clock gene is chairy (chicken-hairy), of course. Who says that scientists don't have a sense of humor.



's avatar #26312: PZ Myers — 05/27  at  11:15 AM
I don't know of any sex differences, but yes, there is variability in vertebral number within mammalian species. here's one example in sheep, for instance. I've also tinkered with zebrafish, and you can induce slight variations with temperature changes, and there's some wobble in the final number, between 30 and 34.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#26314: coturnix — 05/27  at  11:27 AM
Cool. Thanks.



#26323: Alex — 05/27  at  12:06 PM
I'm a big fan of geophilomorphs myself, but for different reasons. One of my very favorite ants- one that practices non-lethal larval cannibalism- is a specialist predator of geophilomorph centipedes. A number of rather ancient ant lineages are geophilomorph predators, a phylogenetic suggestion that geophilomorphs may have been of some significance in the early evolution of ants.



#26477: — 05/28  at  03:24 PM
It occurs to me that there have been popular books written about the scientific history of Drosophila melanogaster (Fly, by Martin Brookes) and Caenorhabditis elegans (In the Beginning Was the Worm, by Andrew Brown), but none, as far as I know, about zebrafish. PZ's post about their sex life was a good start.

The question of who will write the story of Saccharomyces is harder. Nicholas P. Money, in Mr. Bloomfield's Orchard, writes with wonderful enthusiasm about fungi, but he admits to finding only two kinds boring: lichens, because they grow so slowly, and yeasts, because there's nothing to them -- no invasive hyphae, no clever spore dispersal.
Only a biochemist can be truly satisfied by such dull architecture when the grandeur of other fungi can surpass the Palace of Versailles. This is evidenced at scientific meetings: Saccharomyces shows some scars and a bud and requires a vibrant speaker to champion its graces; photographs of the fruiting bodies of some Cordyceps species, presented by a gentleman who mumbles into his beard, are sufficiently lovely to make an audience gasp with delight.
(I'm having to restrain myself from quoting more of this book -- go read it!)



Page 1 of 1 pages

Next entry: Michael Behe: malignant metastasizing metaphors!

Previous entry: I wish it were this easy

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college