Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Monday, September 20, 2004

Teachers are just like ninjas, you know

We can turn any ordinary household object into a deadly weapon. Maybe Homeland Security should put all educators on their "no-fly" list. They did catch one of us.

It wasn't a gun or a knife. It was a weighted bookmark.
Kathryn Harrington was flying home from vacation last month when screeners at the Tampa, Fla., airport found her bookmark. It's an 8.5-inch leather strip with small lead weights at each end.

Oooooh. That's a potent tool for assassination. And you should see what a teacher can do with a red felt-tip pen, or those sticker sheets of gold stars. It isn't pretty.

Now, of course, what do you think airport security would do to someone who tried to carry such an implement of destruction onto a plane? Confiscate it? Not in swaggering, red-meat America, you don't.

Airport police said it resembled a weighted weapon that could be used to knock people unconscious. So the 52-year-old special education teacher was handcuffed, put into a police car, and charged with carrying a concealed weapon.

One of our defenses is our apparent innocence. What an act.

"I pretty much cried throughout the whole thing," said Harrington, a Sunday school teacher with a master's degree from Johns Hopkins University.

Crying, Sunday-school-teaching, and a fancy-pants degree—fear her cunning strategems. You know that once she gets out she's going to callously menace society with her pocket comb or a book of poetry.

According to the TSA's official prohibited items list, anyone who brings any banned item to a screening checkpoint, even accidentally, may be criminally or civilly prosecuted. Even items that are not specifically listed, but could be considered dangerous, are illegal.

So now we let the underpaid, unqualified, uneducated people who get hired to man security checkpoints have the discretion to throw people in jail because they carry some unspecified item they think might be dangerous? Man, what a clever scheme for locking up the intelligentsia.

Don't tell anyone, but I travel with a laptop and various items associated with it. Did you know you can use a USB cable as a garrote, that you can look up explosives recipes on the intarweb with one of those thingies, and that if you sharpen the edges of your CDs you can fling them at people and decapitate them?


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/1267/ZPLSQqbI/

Comments:
#6243: — 09/20  at  08:04 AM
What an absurd country we live in. I wish she would challenge the provisions that let lower-echelon functionaries decide what particular item violates the law. That is obviously unconstitutionally vague. Of course, the constitution isn't what it used to be.



#6244: Charlie Wagner — 09/20  at  08:26 AM
Paul wrote:
[QUOTE]
So now we let the underpaid, unqualified, uneducated people who get hired to man security checkpoints have the discretion to throw people in jail because they carry some unspecified item they think might be dangerous?
[/QUOTE]
Add flashlights to the list. I was stopped at JFK recently by TSA people who spotted my Maglite flashlight (three battery version). I started to object, but then I thought better of it. I didn't want to end up on Rikers Island.



#6245: — 09/20  at  08:37 AM
I expect before too long, especially if Bush is reelected, that the TSA will start requiring travel papers for airline passengers. Then probably for auto travelers. Guys in black uniforms with deathsheads will stop people randomly and ask for their papers. If we are stopped, we will look around furtively, hoping against hope that our papers pass muster. If not, we will be dragged off to some prison where we will rot in anonymity, never having been told the charges or seen a judge or lawyer. Or maybe I'm just dreaming. No one could ever be held without being charged or seeing a lawyer or having a hearing in the US.



's avatar #6246: Ben — 09/20  at  09:09 AM
Did you know you can use a USB cable as a garrote, that you can look up explosives recipes on the intarweb with one of those thingies, and that if you sharpen the edges of your CDs you can fling them at people and decapitate them?

I believe you just preempted all the trademarks of the next Bond villain.

"The great trouble is that the preachers get the children from six to seven years of age and then it is almost impossible to do anything with them." --Thomas Edison.



#6247: — 09/20  at  09:15 AM
I can't tell you how infuriating and frustrating this is to me...events like this are going on all over the place. One of the most frustrating points is this: Consider what it took to arrest and detain this person for, what, five hours, was it? How many people were pulled into this, away from other duties? How many man-hours were utterly wasted on this incident? When, quite frankly, and incredibly (to me) obvious option presents itself. You could have taken the woman aside briefly, fired up an internet terminal, done a Google search for "leather weighted bookmark," and found that yes, this strange weapon that bears the EMBOSSED INITIALS of the alleged ninja terrorist (and of course we all know that ninja terrorists leave identifying marks on ALL their secret weapons of stealth) was indeed coincidentally sold and used as a bookmark! All in about ten minutes.

Maybe I'm talking out my...er...you know, when I say this, I'm not a security expert or a personnel manager, but...to me, whoever's responsible for starting this response AND allowing to proceed (if they were fully informed of the situation) should be fired. They wasted a relatively huge amount of time and money because one man didn't know what something was but thought it was a bit scary, and nobody wanted to take the time to research someone's claims.



's avatar #6249: PZ Myers — 09/20  at  09:52 AM
What you suggest is unpossible. We must select the people who keep our country safe on the basis of the magnitude of their sanctimony, their willingness to use their power against those who offend them, and the single-minded obtuseness of their purpose. These are the only acceptable criteria.

It's how GW Bush is hanging on to power, after all.

Use intelligence and information in a flexible and appropriate way? How naive. I laugh at your innocence.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



's avatar #6251: PZ Myers — 09/20  at  09:55 AM
Yes, Ben, I will consider offers for a starring role as the villain in the next Bond movie. I have a nefarious plan to recruit my henchmen from the invertebrate phyla--Bond villains never seem to hire for intelligence, anyway.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#6259: Hank Fox — 09/20  at  12:07 PM
Have I told this initial anecdote here before? If so, excuse my poor aged memory:

A Jewish coworker friend of mine told me about two weeks ago that he knows a woman in her 80s whose family fled Germany (to England and then to the U.S.) before the Nazis got the country completely into their grip. She recently told him she sees some very disturbing similarities in the "feel" of the two countries, then and now.

Is saying this out loud overly imaginative? Ridiculously alarmist? Maybe. But ...

I can imagine that we're one good "incident" away from fascist-level security in the U.S.

Seriously, kids, as this bookmark thing shows, in today's climate of fear, anybody and everybody can be arrested, on the flimsiest of excuses.

For some people at least, our beloved American government under Bush condones torture and "disappearing" -- imprisonment without charges, trial, permission to see a lawyer, or even notification of the suspect's family. Indefinitely. Just because this doesn't happen to nice people like you and me doesn't mean it's a joke, or some sort of third-world television reality that happens way off somewhere else.

It's happening because we have a cowardly dullard of a president who grew up in America but never understood the least little thing about American ideals, or about the lives of ordinary Americans. And because a lot of us are too afraid, so far, to make it stop happening.

The Bill of Rights doesn't say "Void Where Prohibited by Bush." He only thinks it does.

He's got to go.



#6261: — 09/20  at  12:14 PM
You guys crack me up. Suddenly, Bush is personally responsible for every faux pas and snafu at every level in the country? Your paranoia reminds me of people I knew in college who did so much cocaine, they couldn't stop running to the window looking for the police through a crack in the curtains. The problem was not the police, it was the coke. In this case, it's not the over zealous security personnel, it's left-wing paranoia.



Trackback: Questions Tracked on: Modulator (63.247.138.217) at 2004 09 20 11:50:02
PZ Myers asks a couple reasonable questions. First, concerning dangerous weapons and airport security:So now we let the underpaid, unqualified, uneducated people who get hired to man security checkpoints have the discretion to throw people in jail because they carry some unspecified item they think might be dangerous?While these folks should be extra cautious this incident is just stupid. Second,...



's avatar #6263: PZ Myers — 09/20  at  12:24 PM
No, the problem is a culture of paranoia on the right wing. 9/11 exposed a lot of flabby cowards who are ready to throw away their personal liberty in order to feel more safe, under the wing of their Big Daddy in Washington. Note the word "feel"; not "be more safe", but only to have the perception that Something Is Being Done.

I don't blame Bush alone. I blame the whole idiotic administration. GWB is the figurehead fool, nothing more, who in his blithe ignorance has allowed the loonies to run riot.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#6265: Hank Fox — 09/20  at  12:30 PM
Kinslow, you guys crack me up.

Gosh-oh-gee, ain't nothin' wrong with over-zealous security personnel. Heavens, NO!

I think you personally should write a stern letter to this teacher-lady, and let her know what a coke-snorting paranoid she is for believing any such thing happened to her.

If the neo-con nutjobs haven't used 'em all up already, busily posing as the Only True American Patriots, I recommend the flag stamps.



#6266: Charlie Wagner — 09/20  at  12:30 PM
Kinslow wrote:

Suddenly, Bush is personally responsible for every faux pas and snafu at every level in the country?


http://tinyurl.com/4jz9q



#6267: — 09/20  at  12:39 PM
Charlie I've been meaning to ask you; I don't meet many evolution skeptics or IDC advocates who are anti-Bush. I'm not saying they don't exist, but you're by far the most visible one I know of. If you have the time, how did you come to dislike Bush? Or be pto-democrats? Have you always disliked Republicans or is this something new for you?



#6268: — 09/20  at  12:52 PM

Even items that are not specifically listed, but could be considered dangerous, are illegal.


that covers absolutely every single thing on the planet, or off it, for that matter.

after all, we're humans. all it takes a member of our species to convert absolutely any damn thing at all into a weapon, or at least into a potential danger for someone else, is the desire to do so and enough presence of mind to think creatively. i don't think i have to list any examples on a public forum; i trust that anybody who's paid any attention to history and human behavior won't be able to disagree.

so, in practice, what this regulation really says is that anybody whom a TSA screener suspects of being marginally intelligent and creative while going through an airport security line has thereby committed a crime. after all, they're bound to be carrying something, and if they have any level of smarts at all...

i don't think i shall be flying to, from, or through any U.S. airport any time soon. especially seeing as i'm not even a U.S. citizen; there are safer ways for me to cross this country's borders, and i'm intelligent enough to use them.



#6271: Charlie Wagner — 09/20  at  02:26 PM
~DS~ wrote:

how did you come to dislike Bush?

I didn't "come to dislike Bush". I have a long history of progressive, democratic, liberal, anti-war, anti-Republican activism going back to when I was a teenager.
In fact, Paul and I agree on almost everything. Almost wink
A better question might be "how did you come to be an evolution skeptic"?



#6274: Hank Fox — 09/20  at  02:37 PM
No, Charlie, a more pressing question is: How do you manage constantly-changing gravatars?



#6275: Charlie Wagner — 09/20  at  02:49 PM
Hank Fox wrote:

No, Charlie, a more pressing question is: How do you manage constantly-changing gravatars?

You can attach a gravatar to any e-mail address. Since I have at least a dozen e-mail addresses, I use whichever one corresponds to the desired gravatar when I post a message. All the e-mail addresses point to my master address, so it doesn't matter which one I use. In fact, if I wanted to, I could even use yours! Or you could use mine!



#6276: Charlie Wagner — 09/20  at  02:52 PM
Of course, you have to remember to insert the e-mail address ;-(



#6277: — 09/20  at  03:03 PM
Thanks CW. I think I've heard the evolution story although I have no problem with you telling it. I just don't meet many anti-Bush creationists/IDCists, and I was curious.



#6278: Charlie Wagner — 09/20  at  05:27 PM
~DS~ wrote:

Thanks CW. I think I’ve heard the evolution story although I have no problem with you telling it. I just don’t meet many anti-Bush creationists/IDCists, and I was curious.


Well, there's not much to the evolution story except that I stopped and thought about it for a while. It seems self evident to me, and it baffles me why it's not self evident to others. But then again, Bush is seen as a savior and champion by millions of people despite the fact that he's leading us down the road to ruin, so people are likely to believe anything.
BTW, I would like to correct one possible misconception. I assume that "IDCist" means intelligent design creationist. If so, count me out. I am not now and never have been a creationist of any stripe. The SCIENTIFIC hypothesis that life could not have evolved without the benefit of intelligent input is decidely not the same position as that held by our creationist friends. It is strictly based on logic and empirical data.
Perhaps I might be persuaded if evolutionists took some steps to bridge the enormous gap between changes in gene frequency and the appearance of highly organized structures, processes and adaptations.
Unfortunately there is nothing in the peer-reviewed literature that is supportive of these audacious claims. I'm patiently waiting for evolutionists to present actual evidence that supports their theory, rather than spending time on an obsessive need to bash creationists.



#6279: Reed A. Cartwright — 09/20  at  05:41 PM
I used to have a tiny swiss army "knife" on my keychain. The blade was flimsy and had no lock, so I was more likely to injury myself if I tried to assualt someone with it. It passed the Atlanta airport screeners fine, but on the trip back the Denver screeners spotted it and I could either mail it back to myself or leave it behind. It wasn't worth the postage.

What happened in Tampa is just nuts. I wish there were some statistics about murders comitted with ordinary items like ties, pillows, shell fish, peanuts, vibrators, hands, etc. If airports are going to take away this woman's bookmark, then they should require every passenger to saw off their hands and feet before boarding.



#6280: tim gueguen — 09/20  at  10:06 PM
I wonder how long it will be before everyone is forced to have their belts put in checked in luggage. After all the typical belt would make a nice improvised garrote. Not to mention the fact that a number of Rube Goldbergish belt buckle guns and daggers have been marketed at various times.



's avatar #6281: PZ Myers — 09/21  at  07:02 AM
Hey, and shoelaces. And pens and combs. Someday someone is going to whip off their pants and try to strangle someone with 'em, and then we're all going to have to fly naked.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#6302: — 09/21  at  04:32 PM
"The SCIENTIFIC hypothesis that life could not have evolved without the benefit of intelligent input..."

How is that testable?



Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

Next entry: It's a simple question that would resolve a baffling inconsistency

Previous entry: As Texas, so goes the rest of the nation

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college