That's my kind of poetry...

You know, it just seems to me that poetry has a real deficiency of good juicy grisly bits, and it could be greatly improved by including more. All your Shelleys and Blakes and Longfellows and cummings and Dickinsons and Frosts and whatever go on and on about flowers and ladies with the vapors and urns and 'lend me two quid and I'll repay you by Friday' and so forth, but you can rip through volume after slim volume and find nary a mention of enzymatically lysed arthropod viscera. Occasionally they touch on a subject with some potential (for instance, whatshisname, Prince Namor or something, the fellow with the dead seagull around his neck—there was a situation with possibilities for lurid, pungent detail), but they always throw it away for some frippery like eternal verities or human emotion or the cunning line that makes you think.
Well, enough of that. Poets need to look at the movies to get an idea of what people really want. They want wisecracks punctuated with a kick to the 'nads. They want exploding automobiles. They want gratuitous scenes set in a strip club. They want giant mutant hamsters eating Poughkeepsie.


A short one from Garstang:
The Ancestry of Vertebrates
Gill-slits, Tongue-bars, Synapticulae,
Endostyle and Notochord: all these you will agree
Mark the Protochordate from the fishes in the sea,
And tells alike for them and us our lowly pedigree.
Thyroid, Thymus, Subnotochordal Rod:
These we share with Lampreys, the Dogfish and the Cod,—
Relics of the food-trap that served our early meals,
And of Tongue-bars that multiplied the primal water-wheels.