Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Saturday, May 28, 2005

The Discovery Institute at the Smithsonian?

The Panda's Thumb and Thoughts from Kansas have the story on the announced "sponsorship" of anti-evolution at the Smithsonian. It turns out that the DI is renting an auditorium for $16,000, nothing more, and are doing their best to puff it up into something more significant…such as, that the Smithsonian is "warming to intelligent design theory", according to Denyse O'Leary. The NY Times gets the real story from Bruce Chapman, president of the Discovery Institute.

When asked whether the announcement on the Discovery Institute's Web site meant to imply that the museum supports the film and the event, Mr. Chapman replied:

"We are not implying in any sense that they endorsed the content, but they are co-sponsoring it, and we are delighted. We're not claiming anything more than that. They certainly didn't say, 'We're really warming up to intelligent design, and therefore we're going to sponsor this.'"

Way to go, Bruce! Simultaneously leaving O'Leary twisting in the wind by denying her very own phrasing, while doing your best to smarm up the event as much as possible. If they aren't endorsing it, and if "co-sponsoring" just means they're renting you a room in the Smithsonian building, what have you got to be so delighted about?

Once again, we see that the Discovery Institute is full of cheesy, gladhanding frauds. They aren't aspiring to be scientists; they have a long way to climb up the credibility ladder to reach the level of used-car salesmen.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/2353/HkeAHTlo/

Comments:
#26435: — 05/28  at  10:57 AM
Coming soon to a blurb near you:

Intelligent Design, as seen at the Smithsonian Institution! You can now own your own copy of Privileged Planet: The Search for Purpose in the Universe on DVD as seen at the Smithsonian Institution. Available for sale at the Discovery Institute's website, the actual scientific documentary shown at the Smithsonian Institution, America's pre-eminent scientific organization. Learn how intelligent design has now established itself as the primary scientific rival to random Darwinian chaotic evolution. It's Privileged Planet, as seen at the Smithsonian Institution!



#26444: — 05/28  at  11:21 AM
The Smithsonian is acting like a whore, anyone can rent her services. And for cheap, only 16,000 dollars. They could learn from my university: when Meyer Lansky wanted to make a monster donation, he was rejected. There are things more valuable like money.



#26450: D. B. Light — 05/28  at  11:35 AM
"cheesy,gladhanding frauds" -- hmmm, sounds like a lot of accredited "scientists" I've met. Don't get me started on grantsmanship.

Regarding the ID debate: Both sides in this interminable. execrable, and ultimately demeaning argument are guilty of hyperbole and misrepresentation.

Jaimito -- Nearly all museums are whores. That's how they keep the doors open and the bills paid. In the end, for all their high-minded posturing, they're really in the entertainment business.



#26456: — 05/28  at  12:52 PM
How is 'renting to' the same as 'co-sponsoring'? Jeez, the things these people do to our language....



#26457: — 05/28  at  01:02 PM
Ah, I should read the links properly before posting. 'Co-sponsoring' appears to be the Smithsonian's phrase, rather than the DI's attempt to subvert English I took it for.

Still and all, money must be pretty tight at the SI for them to accept this filthy lucre. Or maybe it's a part of a scheme to demonstrate the intellectual shallowness of the DI's ideas. We can but hope.



#26463: tristero — 05/28  at  01:44 PM
One would hope that the scientific community would scream their heads off over this. If so, please keep us posted on how us civilians can help.



#26466: — 05/28  at  02:03 PM
From the New York Times article:

[Smithsonian spokesperson Randall Kremer] added, "We're happy to receive this contribution from the Discovery Institute to further our scientific research."


Which would make this the first and only contribution the Discovery Institute has ever made to scientific research!



#26467: — 05/28  at  02:38 PM
http://www.techcentralstation.com/051905A.html

Intelligent Decline

Robert McHenry compares ID advocates, unfavorably, to mud men of New Guinea.



#26474: — 05/28  at  03:17 PM
PZ, I meant to ask you about this. Are you okay with the Smithsonian renting the space to the Discovery Institute to show this film?



#26475: — 05/28  at  03:19 PM
Which would make this the first and only contribution the Discovery Institute has ever made to scientific research!


Which doesn't even remotelymake up for all the time and money they have cost real sience by their anti-science and their attempts to push it through.



#26476: — 05/28  at  03:24 PM
The Panda's Thumb has a comment that shows how to contact the Smitsonian in case you don't know. I'm reminded of the cheap Scotsman joke--Why does a Scotsman play the porno DVD backward? Because it shows the whore giving the money back to the john.



#26483: — 05/28  at  04:38 PM
I think this post from Majikthise might explain the mercenary attitude of the Smithsonian.



's avatar #26484: PZ Myers — 05/28  at  04:51 PM
I have mixed feelings about the Smithsonian renting the space. They have policies in place that specifically rule out renting it out for religious or political advocacy, and the DI is both. Unfortunately, they mask their religious and political goals with a false front of pseudoscience; that makes it a little trickier to pigeonhole this particular film. I can also see where the DI could schmooze a few of the less knowledgeable staffers who were screening the film into thinking it's just a different perspective.

If I were one of the screeners, I'd have said no way, just because I am very familiar with the DI's sneaky anti-science agenda.

Here's my main objection. Take a look at the official invitation to the event:



Apparently, this is the product of the Discovery Institute...but it sure makes it look as if the Director of the Smithsonian Institution is inviting people to see this wonderful movie, doesn't it?

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



's avatar #26485: — 05/28  at  05:05 PM
Heck, if it were me, I'd give the DI their money back, citing the fact that they're a front for politico-religious advocacy. But if was a-scared of saying that, then I'd cite this invitation. The cheek of it!



#26487: — 05/28  at  05:13 PM
Worse, it reads as if it is one person - the Director of the NMNH and DI doing the inviting. Does the DI not have a Director so that it could have been "Directors of"? Or might it be deliberate rather than careless?

Although it seems bad to you that they can buy time/space in a serious US museum for an anti-scientific fluff piece; in the UK they can buy whole schools for a relatively low stake. They then get a free pass on rules about inspections and on excluding pupils who might lower their grade average while possibly recouping some of the outlay money in dodgy ways:
http://www.casenet.org.uk/academies.html
One such bought school is still failing despite its unfair advantages:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4584395.stm



#26488: PW — 05/28  at  05:38 PM
Meanwhile NPR -- which has been liberating itself for the past week or so from the stinky hot wingnut breath of the new chairman of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting -- did a wonderful educational piece on evolution (discarding creationism) this afternoon. You can hear "Darwinian Theory on a Molecular Level" here, and "Theory vs. Hypothesis in Science" here.



#26496: — 05/28  at  07:44 PM
Actually, bad as this sounds on first blush, it doesn't mean the forces of science can't spin it for their own ends. From the NYT article:
When the language of the Discovery Institute's Web site was read to him, with its suggestion of support, [Smithsonian spokesman] Mr. [Randall] Kremer said, "We'll have to look into that."

He added, "We're happy to receive this contribution from the Discovery Institute to further our scientific research." [emphasis added]


The obvious spin: We're getting paid to research evolution by people who don't believe in it. To the extent that Discovery gets its money from fundy dimwits, this is a very subversive message.

I think it's clear that the museum will get its act together and force DI to retract its poster. Then (if its canny enough) it'll get the money message out there: DI is paying scientists to make the case for evolution. In the end, this could be one DI loses--a classic case of over-reach.



#26497: — 05/28  at  09:07 PM
Has the SI "co-sponsored" other, um, curious presentations at its facilities in return for contributions?

In regular usage, doesn't "sponsor" imply "support?"



#26502: — 05/28  at  11:08 PM
No, dedicating the money to scientific research does not justify the Smithsonian's accepting it. Money has a way of creating dependency. In the future, the Smithsonian will take care to avoid offending the Discovery Institute. I already can see the word "evolution" disappearing from the Smithsonian's educational material, or being qualified by a reference to "Intelligent Design".



#26522: — 05/29  at  09:49 AM
http://www.scottberkun.com/essays/essay40.htm

Why smart people defend bad ideas
by Scott Berkun

It's not specifically about Creationism.



#26569: John M. Price — 05/29  at  09:16 PM
I was going to say, what the heck. It is a public institution, as are schools, and the public does have a right to access. For instance, bible clubs can meet in public schools as a school group. (Last I looked.) I do not have a problem with that. (I DO have a problem with bible being taught outside of a humanities course, however.)

But I see PZ has mentioned the publicly available policies resticting this facility. In that case, I would like very much to hear that they have, finally, after investigation of the DI, refunded their money and walked away from the deal.



#26644: — 05/30  at  06:49 PM
"national premiere" of a movie that's been available on video for almost a year - ARN has been selling it since September 2004. (ARN-Announce #41, August 31, 2004)

I wonder if DI cleared the ad, and whether they have violated the terms of the agreement. Their press release & the ad are, as usual, deceptive.

Denyse, btw, is freaking obnoxious. She cross-posts many of her blog posts to the American Scientific Association listserve, and castigate ASA members for not (as an organization) sponsoring Intelligent Design (many ASA listserve members are strongly anti-ID). Basically, she writes posts insulting everyone in sight, it's very ugly.



#26731: — 05/31  at  10:58 PM
maybe it wld help educators to consider my theory of 'stupid design', which evolved naturally from the field of 'artificial stupidity' which i cofounded in the early nineties.



#27028: — 06/03  at  08:10 AM
I wrote to the Smithsonian, letting them know how disappointed I was that they would take a donation from these folks - here is what they wrote back:

Your correspondence of June 1, 2005, regarding the screening of "Privileged
Planet" has been received in the Smithsonian's Public Inquiry Mail
Service for response.

The Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History recently approved a
request by the Discovery Institute to hold a private, invitation only
screening and reception at the Museum on June 23 for the film "The
Privileged Planet." Upon further review we have determined that the content
of the film is not consistent with the mission of the Smithsonian
Institution's scientific research. Neither the Smithsonian Institution nor
the National Museum of Natural History supports or endorses the views of the
Discovery Institute or the film "The Privileged Planet." Given that the
Discovery Institute has already issued invitations, we will honor the
commitment made to provide space for the event, but will not participate or
accept a donation for it.


Which, to my mind, is great! We won't take your money, and you're in no way affiliated with us. It's not an ideal solution - but there is some measure of damage control in there.



Page 1 of 1 pages

Next entry: Empire building?

Previous entry: Entropy does not support creationism

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college