Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Thursday, October 06, 2005

Whatever happened to that oxygen bar fad, anyway?

Carl Baugh (you can read his dissertation online) has got it all wrong. He's a creationist who makes wild claims about oxygen concentration fueling the greater strength and intelligence and size of the patriarchs of the Bible, and that dinosaurs were just lizards who grew huge in the oxygen-rich atmosphere before the biblical Flood. (He's also the crazy guy Sadly, No! is mocking).

A paper in this week's Science shows what happens when real scientists examine reality, instead of the fantasies invented by religious kooks. Falkowski et al. examined oxygen concentrations over the last few hundred million years. They did this by examining the isotopic concentrations of carbonates and organic material from marine sediments, and modeling atmospheric conditions from that.

What they determined was that oxygen concentrations were at a low of approximately 10% in the Triassic, rose gradually through the Mesozoic, and hit a peak of 23% in the Eocene, about 10 million years ago. We're now seeing a slow decline to the current value of 21% O2 in our atmosphere.

So O2 concentrations were actually substantially lower in the age of the dinosaurs than they are now. What about the idea that increasing O2 availability would lead to more giants? That seems to be partially true, but in a more complicated way than Baugh thinks. They tried to correlate oxygen levels with major events in the evolution of terrestrial vertebrates (a messy and difficult thing to do, I think), and do claim that there is a pattern: more oxygen means more metabolically active forms, and some increase in size—but the increase is to the present (or near present) size of mammals.

This is their rather complicated summary diagram.

oxygen and evolution
(click for larger image)

Mammal evolutionary events based on fossil morphological and molecular evidence, compared with oxygen concentrations in Earth's atmosphere modeled over the past 205 My using carbon and sulfur isotope data sets; O2 levels approximately doubled over this time from 10% to 21%, punctuated by rapid increases in the Early Jurassic and in the Eocene. Changes in average mammalian body mass is taken from. Vertical black bars represent known fossil ranges, blue lines represent inferred phylogenetic branching. Only some of the ordinal-level placental mammals are shown.

They do describe a doubling of the average size of mammals after the Late Cretaceous, but I'd be reluctant to ascribe that to a simple consequence of increased oxygen availability—there was also that expansion into depopulated niches after the K-T extinction.

Whereas the relatively rapid decline in oxygen at the end-Permian and early Triassic is suggested to have been a major factor contributing to the extinction of terrestrial animals (mostly reptiles) at this time, the rise of oxygen over the ensuing 150 My almost certainly contributed to evolution of large animals. Animals with relatively high oxygen demands, including theropod dinosaurs (the group that includes living birds) and small mammals, evolved by the Late Triassic. Avian and mammalian metabolic demands are three to six times as high per unit biomass as those of reptiles. Although the reproductive strategies of the earliest mammals are not known with certainty, both the fossil record and molecular divergence indicate that superordinal diversification of placental mammals occurred between 65 and 100 Ma. This radiation corresponds to a period of relatively high and stable oxygen levels in the atmosphere. Although placental evolution is not unique to mammals, this reproductive strategy, which can facilitate geographic expansion of a species, requires relatively high ambient oxygen concentrations. In the placenta, maternal arterial blood, with oxygen levels near ambient alveolar pressure, mixes with placental venous blood in a sinuslike vascular structure. Fetal umbilical arterial (really venous) blood arrives in a capillary network in the maternal sinus where oxygen diffuses into the fetal blood. The nature of this exchanger requires the mammalian fetus to live at a very low arterial oxygen pressure. Although at low oxygen, placental hemoglobin binding affinity for O2 is modified by pH (i.e., the Bohr effect), with exceptions, few extant mammals reproduce above elevations of 4500 m, corresponding to atmospheric oxygen levels in the Early Jurassic.

Eh, I hesitate to accept that comparison. There are other differences between a warm lowland swamp at a low partial pressure of oxygen, and a cold arid mountain top at the same partial pressure of oxygen. There are also relatively few extant lizards above those elevations.

Whereas a bolide impact at the Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) boundary and the ensuing extinction of dinosaurs provided ecological opportunity for the radiation of placental mammals, the rise of oxygen in the Eocene corresponds to a large increase in average mammalian body size. The density of capillaries per unit muscle scales to the 0.87 power of size in mammals; hence, larger animals require high ambient O2 levels to obtain maximal metabolic rates. Comprehensive study of body mass of nearly 2000 fossil mammals in the North American record indicates a steady expansion in size range throughout the Cenozoic, tracked by mean body size due to the static lower limit of size. Data show a rapid increase from small to medium-sized mammals in the first few million years after the K-T event. This size contrast is blurred slightly with the recent discovery of larger Cretaceous mammals, but this trend does not appear to be driven by oxygen. A second upward surge in mean body mass is recorded for the early through middle Eocene (50 to 40 Ma), followed by further but less dramatic size increases through the Miocene. This trend tracks a change in oxygen. The early to middle Eocene, an interval characterized by the highest global mean annual temperatures and the broadest latitudinal span of warm subtropical to temperate faunas and floras for the Cenozoic, was also a time of high morphological disparity in North American placental mammals. One might infer that this indicates a proliferation of ecological roles in the North American mammalian fauna. Notably, many of the living placental orders appear in the early Eocene, and artiodactyls, the dominant large terrestrial herbivores today, underwent a massive radiation in the mid-Eocene. Data from other continents are more limited, but there is reason to argue that North America serves as a model for broader patterns, at least in the northern hemisphere. The substantially improving records in Europe and Asia, especially, will provide an interesting test of the pattern.

That's darned cool stuff. I think the correlations are murkier than they let on, but it's reasonable to infer that increasing oxygen would open up expanded metabolic opportunities for larger animals.


Falkowski PG, Katz ME, Milligan AJ, Fennel K, Cramer BS, Aubry MP, Berner RA, Novacek MJ, Zapol WM (2005) The Rise of Oxygen over the Past 205 Million Years and the Evolution of Large Placental Mammals. Science 309(5744):2202-2204.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/3080/kcMv33We/

Comments:
#42940: covington — 10/06  at  01:41 PM
Well, if it got much over 25%, there'd be some beautiful sunsets to watch... as everything flammable on the planet burns.



#42941: — 10/06  at  01:44 PM
Carl Baugh (you can read his dissertation online)....

I assumed that was a joke when I read it -- the idea that he had written a dissertation. Then I followed the link. That is when I figured out what the real joke is...



#42944: Brian S. — 10/06  at  01:57 PM
Tangential question here:

"Although placental evolution is not unique to mammals, this reproductive strategy, which can facilitate geographic expansion of a species..."

Why does it facilitate geographic expansion?



's avatar #42945: PZ Myers — 10/06  at  02:07 PM
You get to bring a nest with you everywhere you go.

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#42947: — 10/06  at  02:28 PM
I apologize for being to lazy to have read the original article, but isn't the best way to figure out whether O2 increases animal just to run some real experiments? It seems like it wouldn't be terribly difficult to manipulate the O2 level in a chamber with mice, mold, plants, fish, etc. and see if there are significant differences in size when the level of O2 is change by amounts within the historical ranges suggested by this article. Correlations are great for generating hypotheses, but it seems that more causal types of research (experiments) could easily be done (and probably have been done). Do you know if this type of experimental data exists, and if so is it consistent with the article?



#42948: ArtK — 10/06  at  02:32 PM
I got a laugh from the title of your post. I was at the L.A. County Fair this weekend with my sons -- we passed an "oxygen bar" and my 8yo asked what it was. My response: "A way of separating you from your money." I also observed that they can't have very much O2 there because there weren't any no-smoking signs and there were people smoking within a few feet of the stand.

They seemed to have flavored oxygen, which I thought was entertaining.

As for Baugh, well... faugh!



#42951: — 10/06  at  02:57 PM
He's a creationist who makes wild claims about oxygen concentration fueling the greater strength and intelligence and size of the patriarchs of the Bible, and that dinosaurs were just lizards who grew huge in the oxygen-rich atmosphere before the biblical Flood.

Couple thoughts on this: First, if these low oxygen levels lead to shrinking and lower intelligence, then why aren't I (and everyone in the Rocky Mountains or any other mountain range) small and stupid? Second, wasn't the use of oxygen on newborns stopped because it was discovered to increase chances of blindness? High oxygen is not some universal good.



#42954: — 10/06  at  03:12 PM
Not to go off on a tangent after such a stimulating post, but the title of your post intrigues me, and I have to ask:

So there really was a fad for oxygen bars? Where? When?

I see one on my daily commute here in the central valley of California, but its the only one I've ever seen anywhere in my 15 years in the US, so I didn't know what to make of it. Were these really popular at some point? And what was the rationale?



#42955: — 10/06  at  03:22 PM
Say what you will about Baugh, but I'm really digging the fact that his thesis has random paragraphs that turn red when the mouse is placed over them.

Rrawr!



#42961: — 10/06  at  03:56 PM
"why aren't I (and everyone in the Rocky Mountains or any other mountain range) small and stupid?"

Interesting.

"The partial pressure of alveolar O2, or PAO2, decreases from 103 mm Hg at sea level to 81 mm Hg in Denver, Colo (5,280 ft), and 48 mm Hg at the top of Pikes Peak (14,110 ft)."

I know this ~20% difference between Miami and Boulder makes a big difference if you're trying to run a 5K race, whether you're acclimated or not. As far as organismal size, well, Colorado does have the lowest rate of obesity and overweight of all the states. And as far as intelligence...het, didn't Focus on the Family set up shop in Coloradio Springs a decade or so ago? ;o)

Baugh's bio:

Doctor of Theology
(2005, Louisiana Baptist University)

Doctor of Philosophy in Education
(1989, Pacific College of Graduate Studies)

Masters in Archaeology
(1984, Pacific College of Graduate Studies)

Bachelor of Arts
(1961, Burton College)

Graduate of Theology
(1959, Baptist Bible College, Valedictorian)

High School Diploma
(1955, Abilene High School, Honor Graduate)


Glad he included his high-school diploma in there for completeness. And such a well-rounded education: Jesus, College-level Jesus, and Really Advanced Jesus, sandwiched around programs that must have been hard for a man of his convictions to fumble his way through.

Anyone awarded a Ph.D. for a dissertation on the coexistence of dinosaurs and humans should have his degree publicly shredded. That's an affront to academia.



#42963: — 10/06  at  03:59 PM
I've been to Glen Rose to hear Baugh-sponsored events in which it is argued that there was also a "vapor canopy" which shielded the Earth from all "harmful radiation" at some time before "the Great Flood." They claim this canopy of water vapor was what the rains came from that got Noah's contemporaries.

Down in Glen Rose a couple of years ago to hear Duane Gish (heh - Vaudeville is dead; what else does one do for entertainment in Glen Rose, Texas?), one guy cornered me as an obvious "evolutionist" (he could tell -- I was taking notes). When he got to the vapor canopy stuff I asked him if he'd ever seen kids with rickets; sadly, he didn't know what rickets is. I explained to him that, without sunlight's UV, the "radiation" that the vapor canopy would prevent, mammals can't fix calcium in bones. Infants don't grow, and shortly after infancy, all bones rubbery and easy to break, the critters die before they can breed. Another guy joined the conversation, and said that he was sure Noah's family drank a lot of milk. I pointed out that Vitamin D has to be added to milk to make up for a lack of sunlight, and that if there was a vapor canopy, there wouldn't be animals that gave milk.

I asked the guys to look it up, to not take my word for it, and I left an e-mail address so they could send me their refutation, which never came.

They really don't think this stuff through at all.

Oh, and in that talk that Gish gave, he explained how impossible it would be for "Mr. Woodpecker" to wait for evolution to endow his tongue with a "special" sticky substance to use to extract insects from trees.

What is that special sticky substance, you may wonder?

Saliva.

Gish won't admit it, but there you go.

I have a hypothesis that there is no serious bird watcher or gardener who is creationist. Anybody know one?



's avatar #42974: Raven — 10/06  at  05:26 PM
Second, wasn't the use of oxygen on newborns stopped because it was discovered to increase chances of blindness? High oxygen is not some universal good.


A PubMed search on "oxygen toxicity" returns 1174 hits. There's a point up to which increasing oxygen helps with things like wound healing, but then diminishing returns kicks in pretty quickly.

Vaguely on-topic, but every time a non-scuba-diver talks about diving with "oxygen tanks", I have to smile--it's either compressed air in the tanks (usual recreational diving), or a primarily nitrogen nitrox (N2 + O2) mixture or something like that for some specialized diving--but breathing pure oxygen, on the other hand, is really, really bad for you--and depth accentuates the effects. What's tolerable at the surface can be really toxic at depth.

God, I miss diving :(.



#42975: — 10/06  at  06:01 PM
I'm one of the coauthors from the study. I'm glad to see the paper discussed here although I would have prefered that the intro didn't include Dr.(?) Baugh.

Regarding comment 1: The highest O2 levles in planetary history are around 35% 280-300MYA. This upper bound is thought to be set by fires.

Human birth weight decreases with altitude. See Figure 1 in Human Adaptation to High Altitude: Regional and Life-Cycle Perspectives. YEARBOOK OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 41:25–64 (1998).

I agree that the coorelations are murky. The study is purely coorelative. For instance, I think it's not likely that a single boundary condition (O2 diffusion between placenta and fetus) could explain diversification. In an ideal study we would use a metabolic budget to predict survivorship and include the energetic costs of finding food, escaping predators etc..I'm not aware if such a model exists and doubt that it could be constrained appropriately.

Interestingly the broad O2 peak coincides with the appearence and extinction of the largest land mammal we know of, Indricotherium (a.k.a. Baluchitherium, Paracaratherium) which lived from about 37MYA to 20MYA.

I'm curious if anyone knows about the details of bat evoluiton. I have read that not much is known because the fossil record is poor.



's avatar #42977: PZ Myers — 10/06  at  06:17 PM
I know, I know...Baugh is not one to bring up in a rational conversation. But I'd just read that funny business on Sadly, No!, and then opened up Science, and...the connection was impossible to avoid.

I don't know much about bat evolution, although there was the recent article in Science by Teeling et al. (Science 307(5709):580-584) that used molecular phylogeny to estimate their origin in the Eocene, about 50 million years ago. Hmm. It seems to coincide roughly with the start of that Tertiary peak in your O2 data...

PZ Myers
Division of Science and Math
University of Minnesota, Morris



#42985: — 10/06  at  06:53 PM
Anyone awarded a Ph.D. for a dissertation on the coexistence of dinosaurs and humans should have his degree publicly shredded. That's an affront to academia.

And it tells you everything you need to know about Louisiana Baptist University, doesn't it?

I can just imagine the value of an American university education if 'work' like this is accepted into the academic conversation. Any intelligent graduate student in any discipline had better start studying Mandarin or German, because China and Germany will lap the USA at an alarming rate if this is allowed to continue.

I am no scientist, but I am an academic. And this shit really worries me.



#42986: — 10/06  at  06:55 PM
Oh, and the Pacific College of Graduate Studies is a diploma mill.



#42987: Chris — 10/06  at  06:59 PM
Allen,

I'm curious about the differences between the evolution of birds and mammals in this scenario, given that birds have a vastly more efficient system for extracting oxygen (which presumably evolved in their dinosaurish ancestors). In fact they can quite happily get around at oxygen partial pressures typical of the tops of very high mountains.

Your thoughts?



#42994: — 10/06  at  08:24 PM
Madhu: So there really was a fad for oxygen bars? Where? When?

I recall reading that the "fad" began in Tokyo, and started with the city issuing oxygen tanks to traffic cops who had to spend hours in the middle of the busiest intersections; apparently some of them had been, quite plausibly, overcome by carbon monoxide fumes.

The famous entrepeneurial Shinto work ethic took over from there, and both "bars" and oxygen vending machines popped up along the busier streets. Of course, somebody then had to take the idea to California, but apparently CO levels were not as high there, even in LA, so the concept didn't get as much traction.

Haven't heard anything about the situation in Tokyo for quite a while now - possibly the slowing-down of the Japanese economy reduced in-city car traffic?

Another relevant '80s-era story: as a result of the great Reagan savings-&-loan robbery, the feds came into possession of all sorts of collateralized goods, including at least one major Nevada brothel. According to news reports, many of the rooms were equipped with oxygen tanks to assist the clientele in their, ah, exertions.



#42998: — 10/06  at  10:57 PM
BC: "Second, wasn't the use of oxygen on newborns stopped because it was discovered to increase chances of blindness?"

Retrolental fibroplasia. An issue with premature babies exposed to high oxygen levels, yes.

I am a font of useless information. smile



#42999: — 10/06  at  11:36 PM
Oh, sweet zombie Jesus, his "dissertation" mentions the Tassaday. I knew it would.



#43018: — 10/07  at  10:55 AM
PZ: I read that bat paper in Science. It's based on molecular clocks and calibrated to a poor fossil record. I guess it's the best we have for the moment.

Chris:
I am an oceanographer and photosynthetic physiologist so this is stretching what I'm familiar with. My work on the paper was generating the 13C organic record.

From what I've read endothermy is thought to have evolved in the early cretacious (120MYA)and true flight (not flight for burst hopping) sometime around 80-100MYA. This according to Hillenius,W. J., Ruben J.A. 2004. The Evolution of Endothermy in Terrestrial Vertebrates:
Who? When? Why? Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 77(6):1019–1042.

Regarding flight and O2. Dudley seems to think that Flight evolved during times of high O2. For insects around the 300MYA (the O2 maxiumum of 35%) and for animals around 80-50MYA. Dudley, R. THE EVOLUTIONARY PHYSIOLOGY OF ANIMAL FLIGHT: Paleobiological and Present Perspectives. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2000. 62:135–55

My guess is that high O2 was required to initiate flight and further adaptaqtion allowed for high altitude low O2 flight.



#43043: mikey — 10/07  at  02:07 PM
Ok, slightly off topic, but maybe in the larger view, not so much. I worked in glen rose texas in my teens, in '76 and '77, while I was traveling around the south getting that "other" kind of education. I can SO well remember sitting in the river, with my feet in a dinosaur footprint, just feeling the eons, the fascination of a lazy summer day, writing letters, on a rock in a stream, dappled sun/shade and a warm breeze, silence, birds singing, Comanche Peak towering overhead, my foot in a DINOSAUR FOOTPRINT!! What could be more awesome. And now I'm thinking, how can someone who has had the opportunity to experience a hundred million years of history like that, right there in glen rose texas, take such an addlebrained position. Makes me sad. Makes me miss those footprints of my friends, the dinosaurs...

mikey



#43060: — 10/07  at  03:33 PM
The footprints are still there, and you can still soak in 'em (depending on just how the Paluxy River is running). Dinosaur Valley State Park is a cheap camp, and a wonderful place to spend a few days as we did with our kids a few years ago when they were still in elementary school. They remember the trip well, even though one started college his fall and the other is in the class of '08 and starting to drive. One has to pass by Baugh's cheap imitation of a museum on the road into the park -- but it's never been open when I've been by, oddly. I think demons warn Baugh I'm coming.



#43087: — 10/07  at  05:44 PM
NASA did some experiments a while back and found that photosynthesizing plants (for which straight oxygen is a waste product) grew best in air with only half the O2 level found on Earth's atmosphere today. Yet Another example of Dumb Design...



#43092: — 10/07  at  06:30 PM
I've always been skeptical that even creationists REALLY believe any of this.

If anyone REALLY believed that an oxygen rich atmosphere increased life expectancy, cause giantism, etc. wouldn't they look for funding to do a scientific study?

Think of the huge sums of money available to someone who could provide an environment (oxygen rich or not) that allowed humans to live to be hundreds of years old!



Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 >

Next entry: It's a fair cop

Previous entry: Look this up in the DSM

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college