Wilkins in absentia
John Wilkins is off to visit his family, and then plans on dropping in on North America (there will be a HowlerFest* in Toronto to hoot and fling feces at him—I'm wrestling with my schedule to squeeze in a thousand-mile trip), so I thought it would be a good idea to send some traffic his way. Nothing like getting a traffic spike when you stop posting to send a message.
Wilkins announces a new book: Mark Isaak's The Counter-Creationism Handbook. Ouch, but it's pricey at $65…but it's also going to be indispensable. Isaak is the head wrangler and writer for the incredibly useful Index to Creationist Claims site, so you know this is going to be good.
Wilkins also describes a wonderfully bizarre genetic system in fire ants. The male and female reproductive lineages are completely separate from each other—no genes from males are in females, and no genes carried by females are in the males. All of the queens are clones of their mother, and all of the males are clones of their father. Wrap your head around that. I'm tempted to write up this paper myself.
*A "howlerfest" is an excrescence of the usenet talk.origins culture—a coagulation of rabid evolutionists, usually at one of their typical haunts (museums or similar concentrations of natural history), and accompanied by serious study of the biochemical byproducts of S. cerevisiae metabolism.


Could someone give me a rundown on the mechanics of this? When I heard about this yesterday, I had to wonder where the male ants were coming from. This link clears that up, but I'm still clueless about what's going on with the ant sperm (ants have sperm, right?). Does it swim up to the appropriate place in the female like a normal spermatazoon, but then implant itself like an ovum?
Also, the workers get genes from the males? Is that how haploidy normally works? I had a vague idea that workers normally got a half complement of the Queen's genes, am I wrong on that?