Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Friday, October 22, 2004

Yet another Chinese enantiornithine bird!

I'm beginning to think China is a country paved with interesting fossils; every week I'm seeing something new published. This is another enantiornithine bird like the one I mentioned yesterday, only this fellow was caught as an embryo—it's all coiled around within a tight oval, a confusing jumble of bones with the skull on the left, looking down (if you can't sort it out in this picture, click on the image for a larger image with a diagrammatic key.)

Lower Cretaceous avian embryo

The authors note a few interesting features: the bird is precocial, with feather traces present. It would have hatched as something a bit more advanced and active than your typical naked peeper. It's also lacking an egg tooth, but it's got regular teeth in its beak—as well as a long bony tail that make it look rather different from modern birds.


Zhou Z, Zhang F (2004) A precocial avian embryo from the lower Cretaceous of China. Science 306(5696):653.


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/1434/V2ub4VTB/

Comments:
#7405: — 10/22  at  11:21 AM
It looks a bit like Longipteryx as well as a bit like Omniopteryx...



#7408: — 10/22  at  12:26 PM
All I can see is a statue of Jesus, with flowing auburn hair, looking out toward 9 o'clock. Below him, at 4 o'clock, is a praying figure (the Madonna?), and above him, at 1 o'clock, a weeping figure (Magdalene?); in the distance, more figures of the apostles.

Or am I just seeing things?



#7410: mattH — 10/22  at  12:52 PM
It would have hatched as something a bit more advanced and active than your typical naked peeper.

Do we know of any birds that are precocial? Gwangi?



#7412: — 10/22  at  01:32 PM
Looking at modern birds it seems clear that precociality was an (if not the) early condition (present in basal clades ratites (Ostrich, Emus, Rheas, etc.), galliforms (Turkeys, Chickens), anseriforms (Swans, Geese, Ducks), and Tinamiformes among others.



#7415: — 10/22  at  03:31 PM
You see Jesus? That's crazy. Obviously, it was just a bunch of sticks.

Oh wait, now I see it! It's so clear now - Jesus, Magdalene, and George W. Bush!

This discovery is obvious proof for Intelligent Design. This was meant to be discovered in China, all in order to influence the U.S. Presidential race! Now that it is obvious who God's choice is, who wouldn't vote for Bush?



#7417: — 10/22  at  04:27 PM
Timmy has a good point



#7418: — 10/22  at  04:54 PM
Does anyone know the full number of feathered dinosaur species at this point? I think it's getting pretty ridiculous to deny the transition.



#7419: — 10/22  at  10:05 PM
There only a small amount of dinosaurs shown to have what appears to be feathers (usually called protofeathers for reasons I have never been able to grasp) that everyone agree did not evolve from a volant ancestor. The Dilong basal Tyrannosaur is one, and the Compsognathid known as Sinosauropteryx is another.

The other animals (Yes, even the Therizinosaur) have decent evidence that they went through a volant past. This includes the dromaeosaurs, Caudipteryx, Protoarchaeopteryx ect...



Page 1 of 1 pages

Next entry: Pufferfish and ancestral genomes

Previous entry: It's been a rough week

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college