Pharyngula

Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/

Monday, November 22, 2004

You built it on WHAT?

It sounds like the premise of a bad horror movie, but the Washington State Department of Transportation has discovered that the Hood Canal bridge was built on top of a native American burial ground.

The excavation inadvertently unearthed Tse-whit-zen, the largest prehistoric Indian village ever discovered in Washington, portions of which date back more than 1,700 years.
With each shovel of dirt, the state and tribe have come to realize what they are grappling with. One of Washington's largest transportation projects is amid the region's richest archaeological site, including an ancient cemetery.
Excavation has desecrated grave after grave, including 264 intact human skeletons so far, and more than 700 isolates, or bone fragments. The remains reveal statements of rank, of love and grief: shamans dusted with red ochre; couples buried with limbs intertwined; mass graves, signaling smallpox.
More than 5,000 artifacts have surfaced, including blanket pins fashioned in the shapes of animals; a stone rake for harvesting herring; hand tools; even the intact, sacrificial remains of sea otters offered to the spirit world.

There's a fair bit of religious hokum in the article; goofy stuff such as the claim that pouring a concrete slab would trap the spirits forever (piling dirt and rocks on top of them doesn't, apparently, nor does rotting into a smear), and spiritual advisors on site and ritual anointings to protect people from angry spirits. That's all baloney, but still, the amazing thing is that the state is just barreling ahead with the project. They've got this unique archaeological site, and the construction equipment is tearing through it all.

"I know of no publicly funded project in the United States that has continued with this many graves," said David Rice, senior archeologist for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District. "There is no end in sight, and we are approaching 1,000. Most sites I know of that found as many as 30 burials were stopped in their tracks.
"This is unprecedented in the United States."
Bones have been inadvertently hauled to the dump and left on construction spoil, split in half by excavators and crumbled as they were dragged across the bottoms of ditches with excavating equipment. Skulls have been shattered, and the remains of families that were buried together have been scattered.

The religious/spiritual crap cuts no ice with me, but I'm still on the side of the native Americans here: this ought to stop. To my mind, there are two really solid reasons to be irate at this desecration by the state government:

  • The casual destruction of an immense piece of native American cultural heritage is an insult to the descendants of the people who lived there. It's a declaration that this piece of history was unimportant and can be bulldozed at will…just as we bulldozed through the living tribes to set up our own culture.
  • While I am confident that 'spirits' are nonexistent, there is something very, very real at this site: knowledge and history. We're throwing that away. And that is something that really pisses me off.

What I really don't understand, though, is why this project hasn't slammed to a complete stop while everyone reassesses and replans and tries to come up with a new solution. I know, follow the money—and the tribes have very little while the commercial interests that want the bridge do—but this is such an egregious example of cultural demolition that you'd think there'd be much more public concern.

(via Eclecticism)


Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/1592/GYVWV2CS/

Comments:
#9500: — 11/22  at  09:48 AM
Under the Antiquities Act, I wouldn't think they have the right to continue destruction of the site prior to completing the required assessment.



#9503: — 11/22  at  10:04 AM
"spiritual advisors on site and ritual anointings to protect people from angry spirits." Fantastic! Here in Israel you cannot dig a hole in the soil without finding human bones, so our learned rabbis found a solution to avoid angering the dead while allowing real estate development: it is called "soul chimneys". The bones are left undisturbed but encased in concrete box with an opening of undisturbed soil that connects the tomb with Earth. The idea is to allow the soul to freely wander in and out of the tomb. I am sure you could also do some creative thinking that (a) would allow building the bridge, (b) protect the cultural heritage of native Americans and, most important, (c) let their souls requiescat in pace.



#9505: Jan Theodore Galkowski — 11/22  at  10:21 AM
Might this be selective disregard of law because the authorities think that they can get away with it, with sympathies in D.C. and in their state being on the side of development?

I agree, stop and reassess. History is an important thing to preserve, and we forget so much of it as it is. I'm not saying stop the project. I'm saying some means of protection and accomodation needs to be implemented.

Consider what reaction would be if such a project ploughed through a Christian burial ground without hesitating.

Our collective outlook is so callous sometimes.



#9507: — 11/22  at  10:56 AM
...mass graves, signaling smallpox...

More evidence of the brutal biological warfare waged by European conquerors. No wonder they're in such a rush to pave over it.



#9509: — 11/22  at  11:15 AM
Backhoe archeology has been around in this state for quite a while; we should cease immediately and reconsider the project. Is it too simplistic to put republicans in the backhoes and democrats on the ground with brushes? Probably, but it feels right.



#9510: Jan Theodore Galkowski — 11/22  at  11:42 AM
Backhoe archeology has been around in this state for quite a while; we should cease immediately and reconsider the project. Is it too simplistic to put republicans in the backhoes and democrats on the ground with brushes? Probably, but it feels right.

Where's that near-Earth asteroid when you need one?



#9512: mattH — 11/22  at  12:34 PM
This sickens me. I wish the writers had contacted the WSDOT and got them on record as to why they haven't stopped.

It's pretty apparent that somehwere a major mistake was made regarding the Culture Resource Managment plan for the site. While it is possible to miss cultural material in a survey, unless these burials were extremely dense they shoudn't have been missed by a well designed survey. That, coupled with the current treatment of the burials, more than gives the Army Corps license to recind it's permit. Why they haven't is criminal, but I have seen political operatives influence the Army Corps in the past, plus there is a flawed agreement that the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe entered into with the state when burials first were found that probably makes it easier to ignore the law.



#9527: — 11/22  at  06:12 PM
Imagine that site containing Civil War graves and relics, especially on the Confederate side. GW Bush hisself would be flown in via helicopter to halt the excavation and pose for a dandy photo-op.



#9530: — 11/22  at  08:09 PM
Not if there was oil underneath those Civil War relics.



#9539: — 11/22  at  10:47 PM
As a backhoe jockey and roadbuilder in a former life, there is no doubt in my mind that the contractor would try to forge ahead without drawing attention to anything unusual that is excavated. But, the state engineers overseeing the job most certainly should have been a countervailing force. (One reason we have regulations and inspectors). On what basis they are just forging ahead mystifies me. If they have such a strong impulse to pave something, we have a few roads out here in eastern WA that need widened, including a very dangerous stretch between WSU and UI, Pullman to Spokane ...



#9542: — 11/22  at  11:21 PM
Since the religion in question is a Native American one, your political correctness trumps your usual hostility to religion. In the same manner you delight in the truths of evolution that offend the sensitivities of Christians, but you are terrified to admit even to yourself that there are evolved differences between races.



#9548: Jan Theodore Galkowski — 11/23  at  01:32 AM
... but you are terrified to admit even to yourself that there are evolved differences between races.

This may have changed since the last time I looked into it in detail (late 1980s), but if I recall, there is no consistent biological basis for the social concept of race. There is skin color and certain related external features, but if one looks at the genome and matches similarities/differences, the hyperspace clouds between any two "races" overlap so much, there is no meaningful statistical difference.

Naturally, if one takes this to the logical conclusion, there is no biological basis for discrimination or preference. Race, then, is a social construct, and whatever deference is shown to one race or another must be based upon social values and history of treatment.

Further, there are failures to embrace certain features of natural history let alone evolution which are strikingly offensive to non-Christian religions, even of the same tradition. To a Jew, there is nothing singular about the planet Earth, even if they believe in a Divine Creation, however that Creation was realized. To a Jew, the idea of constraining the Divine to work the Divine's Will in literal or necessarily understandable terms is blasphemy, as is limiting the meaning of the Torah to its face value, especially if it is the Divine's own Word, for it is the product of an Infinite Mind.

In Christian theology, evidence for the typicality of Earth in the universe is a problem demanding explanation, for if Earth is typical, then sometime, someplace there should be intelligent life elsewhere, and it is implausible their history parallels our own. Perhaps they suffered no Fall and did not need to be saved in Jesus Christ? And if they did, did Jesus Christ make a tour of the universe suffering and dying on each planet to save it?

In Judaism and other religions, people and Earth are just one of a myriad of creations of the Divine, however unique Israel's and Peoples' relationship is with the Divine. Intelligent life elsewhere? Not a problem. Certainly they would not have the Torah, however universal it might be.



Page 1 of 1 pages

Next entry: Mencken was a prescient genius

Previous entry: They aren't biologically practical, but they're cool to look at

<< Back to main

Info

email PZ Myers
Search
Archives
UMM—America's best public liberal arts college