The trackback URL for this entry is:
Trackbacks:
- Unintelligent design
Following the New York Times’ anti-evolution op ed piece by Michael Behe two weeks ago, (debunked here and here), today’s magazine editorial by Jim Holt sets the record straight, to an extent. Holt asks the question, if there was aTracked on: Skeptico (66.151.149.25) at 2005 02 21 11:17:22 - Some background reading on Behe
In preparation for tomorrow night's Behe-Cassone smackdown, here's a link to a recent opinion piece in the NYT - Behe on the four pillars of ID (link is to reprinting in the Houston Chronicle; the NYT site has it in the paid archives now). PZ Myers a...Tracked on: blogs for industry (165.91.51.121) at 2005 02 14 23:57:35 - Happy Birthday, Big D!
In honor of Charles Darwin's birthday, the Cleveland Museum of Natural History (with various groups from Case Western) sponsored a public lecture/discussion on Saturday titled "Defending Darwin: Why Creationists Persist in Attacking Evolution Educati...Tracked on: Bad Glacier (66.33.197.204) at 2005 02 14 15:26:46 - Four Thousand Holes in Blackburn, Lancashire
Michael J. Behe, Professor of Biological Sciences at Lehigh University, deserves an award. For today, he may have set a record for biggest load of scientific crap ever published on the OP-ED page of The New York Times.Tracked on: Corndoggerel (72.9.234.70) at 2005 02 10 11:19:14 - But He's A Biologist And A Scientist...!
One of my loyal readers alerted me to this op-ed in yesterday's New York Times. Michael Behe in Design For Living attempts to give credence to the dangerous silliness of intelligent design which, in the tradition of the Holy Roman Empire, is neither ...Tracked on: Have Coffee Will Write (72.9.234.70) at 2005 02 10 07:38:10 - “Intelligent” Design: The Trashing Thereof
The Creationist wackos are at it again, trying to get their own “theory” validated in the schoolrooms. This gets my back up...Tracked on: white pebble (66.159.239.140) at 2005 02 08 07:22:48