The trackback URL for this entry is:

Trackbacks:

1. Blueprint to improve science journalism.
   
   Is there a way to get science journalism to work better? (What do I mean by “better”? The facts are reported accurately, and the non-scientist reader has a sense not only of why the science matters, but also of how the science was produced.) Could good science journalism go beyond helping people make rational decisions about what to eat, what to drive, and how to understand various bits of their world, to helping people have a better grasp of scientific reasoning — maybe even helping them see…
   Tracked on: Adventures in Ethics and Science (66.159.239.140) at 2005 09 26 14:33:10

<< Back to main